Conventional and synthetic MRI in children with drug-resistant epilepsy:
a comparative study
XIAONA Zhang1, QUANXIN YANG1, and XIAOCHEN WEI2,3 1The Second affiliated hospital of Xi'an JiaoTong Uuniversity, Xi'an, China, 2GE Healthcare, MR Research China, Beijing, China, 3GE Healthcare, MR Research China, Xi'an, China
Synopsis
The
current study aims to assess whether multi-contrast qualitative and
quantitative relaxation imaging derived from the synthetic MRI can enhance detection of epileptogenic lesions in children. It was concluded
that the synthetic MRI has the potential to be more
sensitive in detecting lesions than conventional neuroimaging. Studies with
more patients are needed to further demonstrate the relative advantages of the
synthetic MRI over conventional MRI, and compare the synthetic MRI with
3-dimentional high resolution MRI.
Introduction
Epilepsy
affects approximately 50 million people around the world. Up to 40% of
individuals with epilepsy have drug-resistant epilepsy[1].
Surgery has been shown to be effective and cost-effective to this population. Brain
imaging has a crucial role in the presurgical assessment of patients who may be
potential surgery candidates. Unfortunately, greater than 20% of patients with drug-resistant
epilepsy do not have a structural lesion visible on conventional MRI
neuroimaging, which may be due to the lack of contrast in conventional MRI
neuroimaging. The recently developed synthetic MRI technology, with four
saturation delays and two echo times, is able to generate variable qualitative,
weighted imaging as well as quantitative maps[2]. Studies have shown that the synthetic
MRI has shorter scan time, better imaging contrast, and quantitative measurement
of normal appearing brain tissue. The current study aims to investigate whether
the synthetic MRI can enhance detection of epileptogenic lesions relative
to conventional neuroimaging in children with drug-resistant epilepsy.
Material and Methods
A
total of 52 infants and children (age 8±2 years, age range 3-15 years) were
included in this study. The mean duration of epilepsy at the time of evaluation
was 6 years (range 2-11 years). All brain imaging was performed on a 3-T MRI
system (Pioneer, GE Healthcare) with a 21-channel head coil. All patients
underwent a synthetic MR sequence (fast spin echo multi-dynamic multi-echo
sequence) in addition to conventional MR sequences. The synthetic MR sequence
includes four saturation delays and two echo times. Each
acquisition produced 16 complex images per section with different echo time and
saturation delay combinations. The synthetic sequence parameters were as
follows: TR=4600ms, two echo times (TEs, 20.3 and 101.7 ms), four delay times
(146, 546, 1879, and 3879 ms), Bandwidth=22.5kHz, NEX=1, FOV=24cm×24cm, slice
thickness/gap=4/0.5mm, matrix=320×256, and scanning time = 5 min 20 s. The
synthetic weighted images, including T1- , PD-, and T2-weighted images, T1- and
T2-FLAIR, short time inversion recovery (STIR), phase sensitive inversion
recovery (PSIR) and PSIR Vessel, double IR gray matter (DIR-GM) . double IR
white matter (DIR-WM), and quantitative relaxation images, included T1-, T2-,
R1-, R2, and PD-map, were generated from the raw data produced by synthetic
imaging sequence using a vendor-provided program (MAGiC,version 100.1.1). Conventional
T1- and T2-weighted images and T2-FLAIR images were acquired based on the
standard imaging protocol of our institution. Total acquisition time for
conventional imaging sequences was 7 min 5 s. The conventional and synthetic MR
image data sets were evaluated separately by two neuroradiologists. Interobserver
agreement was assessed by weighted kappa statistics. Clinical epilepsy data,
including Video-electroencephalography findings and seizure semiology, was
recorded.
Results
All of 52 studies, 34 had a lesion identified with 21/34
abnormalities being non-specific. Of 13 remaining studies, 10 (19%) demonstrated
suspicious lesion on the conventional imaging, and significant lesion on synthetic
PSIR, DIR-GM and R2 map (Fig 1), and 3 (6%) revealed quantitative abnormalities
only on synthetic T1- and T2- map, and R1- and R2- map (Fig 2). The synthetic
MRI lesions were concordant with clinical epilepsy data
in all 13 subjects. Interobserver agreement between the two neuroradiologists
was perfect for the synthetic MRI (k = 0.96), and moderate for conventional
imaging (k = 0.62).
Discussion and Conclusion
To
our best knowledge, this is a preliminary study of applying the synthetic MRI
in children with drug-resistant epilepsy. As compared with
conventional neuroimaging, the synthetic MRI could identify lesion more
significantly in 19% and uniquely in 6% of our patients, with shorter acquisition
time. PSIR of the synthetic MRI combines inversion recovery with
phase-sensitive reconstruction, while DIR-GM of the synthetic MRI suppresses the
signal from both CSF and normal WM. These promote the contrast between gray
matter and white matter, and between lesions and the normal-appearing brain
tissues[3,4], which could explain that lesion was revealed more significantly.
In our study, synthetic quantitative maps were found to be capable of revealing
the lesion more significantly. This indicates that quantitative relaxometry might
be a sensitive means of revealing early or subtle abnormalities. In conclusion,
the synthetic MRI show the potential to be more sensitive in detecting
epileptogenic lesions relative to conventional neuroimaging in children with
drug-resistant epilepsy. Studies with more patients are needed
to further demonstrate the relative advantages of the synthetic MRI over conventional
MRI, including 3-dimentional high resolution MRI.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.
References
[1] WHO. Epilepsy: a public health
imperative. https://www.who.int/mental_health/neurology/epilepsy/report_2019/en/. 2019.
[2]
Warntjes JB, Leinhard OD, West J, et al. Rapid magnetic resonance
quantification on the brain: optimization for clinical usage. Magn Reson Med 2008,
60(2): 320-329.
[3] Hou
P, Hasan K M, Sitton C W, et al. Phase-sensitive T1 inversion recovery imaging:
a time-efficient interleaved technique for improved tissue contrast in
neuroimaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005, 26(6): 1432-1438.
[4]
Motegi S, Shimada T, Hayashi N, et al. Double inversion recovery imaging of the
brain: deriving the most relevant sequence through real images. Radiol Phys
Technol 2017, 10(3): 364-375.
Figures
Comparison of conventional
MRI (A ~ C) and synthetic MRI (D~F). Conventional T1FLAIR (A), T2WI (B), and
T2FLAIR(C). Synthetic PSIR (D), DIR GM (E), and R2 Map (F). Red arrow indicates
lesion of right hippocampus.
Comparison
of conventional MRI (A ~ C) and synthetic MRI (D~F). Conventional T1FLAIR (A),
T2WI (B), and T2FLAIR(C). Synthetic T1 map (D) and R1 map (E), and the quantitative
result (F, the T1 and T2 relaxation value of white matter of left temporal lobe
decreased; the data of right temporal lobe is not shown ).