Xueling Liu1, Liqin Yang1, Yuxin Li1, Daoying Geng1, Pu-Yeh Wu2, and Yong Zhang2
1Department of Radiology, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China, 2GE Healthcare China, Beijing, Shanghai, China
Synopsis
Loss
of melanized dopaminergic neurons(1) and iron deposition(2) in substantia nigra (SN) were pathological
hallmarks of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Susceptibility images from QSM could detect iron deposition(3, 4) while neuromelanin-sensitive MRI (NM-MRI) could
reflect change of melanized dopaminergic neurons(5, 6) in SN. In this study, we found highly spatial similarity
of SNhyperintense on Mag1 images from QSM
and on NM-MRI images. PD-patients could be differentiated from old HCs on Mag1
images as similar as that on NM-MRI images. Combined with Mag1 and
susceptibility images, QSM could provide a promising imaging biomarker for iron
deposition and NM deficiency in PD simultaneously.
Introduction
The
progressive loss of melanized dopaminergic neurons(1) as well as iron deposition(2) in substantia nigra (SN) have been
characterized as the pathological hallmarks of Parkinson’s disease (PD). Thus,
neuroimaging techniques sensitive to neuromelanin (NM) and iron are promising
tools for the detection of pathological changes associated with PD. Susceptibility
images from quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) could detect iron
deposition(3, 4) while neuromelanin-sensitive MRI (NM-MRI) could
reflect the change of melanized dopaminergic neurons(5, 6) in SN. However, in current MR imaging
approaches, images sensitive to iron are not sensitive to NM, and vice versa. A
number of studies(7-9) have combined QSM and NM-MRI acquisitions to
simultaneously explore pathological changes in PD, including NM deficiency and
iron deposition in SN. Nevertheless, this approach is time consuming in
clinical practice, which can induce head motion and lead to lower quality
images. Moreover, registration of the two imaging modalities is needed for
subsequent imaging analysis.
In clinical practice, we noticed
that there was a pair of hyperintense crescent-shaped structures in the
midbrain on the first gradient echo magnitude (Mag1) images of QSM, which
resembles the previously reported appearance of SN on NM-MRI images. The first
echo time of QSM magnifies the short T1 contrast and minimizes T2* effects.
Herein, we hypothesize that the midbrain hyperintense regions on Mag1 and
NM-MRI images are spatially congruent, and that the morphology and signal
changes on Mag1 images have the same diagnostic performance as NM-MRI images in
PD. In this study, we therefore aimed to evaluate the spatial similarity of the
SN on short echo time magnitude images from QSM and NM-MRI images. The
diagnostic performances for Parkinson’s disease (PD) were also assessed based
on two modality imaging metrics.Purpose
To examine the
similarity of the hyperintense area on Mag1 images from QSM compared to NM-MRI
images, and compare their diagnostic performance in PD.Methods
Twenty-three
healthy controls (15 older HCs aged between 43 and 66 years, and 8 younger HCs aged between 20 and 34 years), and 18 PD patients aged between 40-79 years were recruited in
this study. All MR examinations were performed on a 3.0T scanner (DiscoveryTM
MR750, GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI). All participants underwent a T1-weighted
FSE NM-MRI acquisition (TR/TE = 600/13 ms, flip angle = 145°, FOV = 240 × 240
mm, matrix size = 512 × 320, slice thickness = 1.5 mm, number of slices = 16,
NEX = 5, acquisition time = 8:03 min) and a three-dimensional
multi-gradient-echo QSM acquisition (TR/TE1 = 41.6/3.2 ms, number of echoes =
16, TE spacing = 2.4 ms, bandwidth = 62.50 kHz, flip angle = 12°, FOV = 256 × 256
mm, matrix size = 256 × 256, slice thickness = 1 mm, number of slices = 140,
acceleration factor = 2, acquisition time = 9:00 min). Mag1 (TR=41.6ms,
TE=3.2ms) from QSM data were extracted. NM images were first co-registered to
the Mag1 images using the SPM12 software package (http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/) implemented in MATLAB (Mathworks, Natick, MA).
Bilateral SN hyperintense area (SNhyperintense) was manually
segmented on Mag1 and co-registered NM-MRI images (Fig. 1). The dice similarity
coefficient (DSC) and the average deviation of centers of mass were calculated
to compare the spatial overlap in HC. The volume and contrast noise ratios
(CNR) of SNhyperintense were acquired to evaluate the diagnostic
performance in PD and old HC.Results
DSC of Mag1 and
NM-MRI images were 0.84 ± 0.046 and 0.84 ± 0.047 for right and left SNhyperintense,
respectively. The average deviation of centers of mass on Mag1 and NM-MRI
images were 0.48 ± 0.29 mm and 0.56 ± 0.26 mm for right and left SNhyperintense,
respectively (Fig. 2). The volumes of bilateral SNhyperintense show
significant correlations on Mag1 and NM-MRI images, as well as contrast noise ratios (CNRs) (p < 0.001). Both volume and CNR of SNhyperintense
were significantly decreased in the PD patient group on Mag1 and NM-MRI images (p
< 0.05) (Fig. 3). There was no significant difference in AUC for volume (p =
0.362) and for CNR (p = 0.370) for differentiating PD from older HCs on Mag1
and NM-MRI images (Fig. 4).Discussion
The current study
aimed to explore the similarity of the SNhyperintense area on Mag1
and that on NM-MRI images. Our results demonstrated that the SNhyperintense
areas on Mag1 and NM-MRI images have a high DSC more than 0.8
and the centers of mass were almost the same with only about 0.5 mm deviation. PD
patients exhibited decreased volume and reduced CNR of this area on mag1 images,
with an equivalent performance as that on NM-MRI images. Our findings suggested
that mag1 from QSM may display the same area as NM-MRI, and could be combined
with susceptibility maps to evaluate both iron deposition and neuromelanin
changes simultaneously.Conclusion
SNhyperintense
showed satisfactory
spatial overlap between Mag1 images and NM-MRI images, and
can achieve good performance in differentiating PD from HCs by
detecting changes in volume and CNR.Acknowledgements
Authors
thank Kristina Zeljic for her support in polishing the manuscript. Authors
thank all patients and healthy controls in this study.
References
1. Fearnley JM, Lees AJ. Ageing and
Parkinson's disease: substantia nigra regional selectivity. Brain 1991;114 ( Pt 5):2283-2301
2. Zecca L,
Stroppolo A, Gatti A, Tampellini D, Toscani M, Gallorini M, et al. The role of
iron and copper molecules in the neuronal vulnerability of locus coeruleus and
substantia nigra during aging. Proc Natl
Acad Sci U S A 2004;101:9843-9848
3. He N, Ling H,
Ding B, Huang J, Zhang Y, Zhang Z, et al. Region-specific disturbed iron
distribution in early idiopathic Parkinson's disease measured by quantitative
susceptibility mapping. Hum Brain Mapp
2015;36:4407-4420
4. Barbosa JH,
Santos AC, Tumas V, Liu M, Zheng W, Haacke EM, et al. Quantifying brain iron
deposition in patients with Parkinson's disease using quantitative
susceptibility mapping, R2 and R2. Magn
Reson Imaging 2015;33:559-565
5. Sasaki M, Shibata
E, Tohyama K, Takahashi J, Otsuka K, Tsuchiya K, et al. Neuromelanin magnetic
resonance imaging of locus ceruleus and substantia nigra in Parkinson's
disease. Neuroreport
2006;17:1215-1218
6. Kitao S, Matsusue
E, Fujii S, Miyoshi F, Kaminou T, Kato S, et al. Correlation between pathology
and neuromelanin MR imaging in Parkinson's disease and dementia with Lewy
bodies. Neuroradiology
2013;55:947-953
7. Langley J, Huddleston
DE, Chen X, Sedlacik J, Zachariah N, Hu X. A multicontrast approach for
comprehensive imaging of substantia nigra. Neuroimage
2015;112:7-13
8. Langley J,
Huddleston DE, Sedlacik J, Boelmans K, Hu XP. Parkinson's disease-related
increase of T2*-weighted hypointensity in substantia nigra pars compacta. Mov Disord 2017;32:441-449
9. Jin L, Wang J,
Wang C, Lian D, Zhou Y, Zhang Y, et al. Combined Visualization of Nigrosome-1
and Neuromelanin in the Substantia Nigra Using 3T MRI for the Differential Diagnosis
of Essential Tremor and de novo Parkinson's Disease. Front Neurol 2019;10:100