Recent work suggests that aberrant functional neurocircuitries arise prior to significant structural atrophy and clinically cognitive deficits in dementia. Using a rigorous, longitudinally confirmed multi-domain amnestic MCI cohort we show that functional decoupling of networks implicated in memory and executive function, occur prior to measurable MTL atrophy in this population. Moreover, we show that decreased functional connectivity in these networks is associated with poorer cognitive performance. Further longitudinal studies investigating the neuronal underpinnings of disease progression will provide insight into potential functional biomarkers and establish significance of functional decoupling within the sequential model of dynamic biomarkers of Alzheimer’s pathological cascade.
1. Sperling, R.A., et al., Toward defining the preclinical stages of Alzheimer’s disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimer's & Dementia, 2011. 7(3): p. 280-292.
2. Gauthier, S. and J. Touchon, Mild cognitive impairment is not a clinical entity and should not be treated. Archives of Neurology, 2005. 62(7): p. 1164-1166.
3. Klekociuk, S.Z., et al., Reducing false positive diagnosis in MCI: The importance of comprehensive neuropsychological assessment. European Journal of Neurology, 2014. 21: p. 1330-1336.
4. Klekociuk, S.Z. and M.J. Summers, Exploring the validity of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) subtypes: Multiple-domain amnestic MCI is the only identifiable subtype at longitudinal follow up. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 2014. 36(3): p. 290-301.
5. Palmer, K., L. Fratiglioni, and B. Winblad, What is mild cognitive impairment? Variations in definitions and evolution of nondemented persons with cognitive impairment. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 2003. 107(s179): p. 14-20.
6. Summers, M.J. and N.L.J. Saunders, Neuropsychological measures predict decline to Alzheimer's dementia from mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychology, 2012. 26(4): p. 498-508.
7. Mars, R.B., et al., On the relationship between the "default mode network" and the "social brain". Front Hum Neurosci, 2012. 6: p. 189.
8. Vincent, J.L., et al., Evidence for a frontoparietal control system revealed by intrinsic functional connectivity. J Neurophysiol, 2008. 100(6): p. 3328-42.
9. Chen, X., et al., High-order resting-state functional connectivity network for MCI classification. Hum Brain Mapp, 2016. 37(9): p. 3282-96.
10. Reuter, M., H.D. Rosas, and B. Fischl, Highly accurate inverse consistent registration: a robust approach. Neuroimage, 2010. 53(4): p. 1181-96.
11. Whitfield-Gabrieli, S. and A. Nieto-Castanon, Conn: A Functional Connectivity Toolbox for Correlated and Anticorrelated Brain Networks. Brain Connectivity, 2012. 2(3): p. 125-141.
Hippocampal differentiation between groups. Pairwise analysis results for both left and right whole, head and body hippocampal segmentations. Results show significant reduction in all hippocampi segmentation volumes between mAD and mdaMCI and HC. An example of a 3D surface rendering of the left and right hippocampi volumes superimposed over the structural dataset (top right) and individual head, body and tail segmentations (bottom right) are given for reference.
Functional decoupling with disease progression. Whole-brain ROI-to-ROI analysis (top left) revealed a global decoupling in the mdaMCI group with significant reductions within and between temporal, frontal, limbic and occipital regions when compared to HC. A focused analysis including 56 pre-identified frontal, temporal and limbic regions (top right) revealed significant reductions in functional connectivity between the temporal gyrus, amygdala and frontal regions.This decoupling pattern did not continue with disease progression.
Functional connectivity correlates of memory and executive function performance scores. Bivariate correlation analysis revealed significant association between (A) memory domain scores and fronto-temporal-limbic functional connectivity. Verbal working memory (top left), visual working memory (bottom left) and visual recall (bottom middle). (B) Executive domain: sustained attention performance (top right). Verbal recall analysis and response time (top middle and bottom right) implicated significant associations with temporal-limbic regions only.