Remika Mito1,2, Robert Smith1, Thijs Dhollander1, Christopher Rowe3,4, Victor Villemagne3,4, Amy Brodtmann1,3, and Alan Connelly1,2
1Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, Australia, 2Florey Department of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia, 3Department of Medicine, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia, 4Department of Molecular Imaging & Therapy, Centre for PET, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia
Synopsis
Alzheimer’s
disease (AD) is characterised by degeneration of specific white matter tracts,
however the longitudinal trajectory of tract-specific decline has not yet been well
described. In this work, we utilise a longitudinal fixel-based analysis framework
to investigate specific fibre tracts that exhibit accelerated decline in AD and
mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Whole-brain analysis revealed that select fixels
exhibit accelerated rates of decline in AD compared to healthy elderly
controls, while MCI patients did not exhibit accelerated decline in any fibre
structures. Tract-of-interest analysis revealed group differences in tract
trajectories over time.
Introduction
Alzheimer’s
disease (AD) is characterised by degeneration to specific white matter fibre
pathways1. However, the longitudinal trajectory of
degeneration to these fibre tracts remains unclear. While longitudinal changes to
white matter in AD have been described to some extent using diffusion tensor
imaging (DTI)2,3, these studies have only explored within-group or between-group
differences in DTI metrics at given time-points, rather than exploring dynamic longitudinal
trajectories, and have been unable to assess tract-specific changes
due to the inherent limitations of DTI4. In this study, we thus apply a longitudinal fixel-based
analysis (FBA)5 framework to investigate fibre tracts that
exhibit accelerated decline in AD and mild cognitive impairment (MCI)
patients, and explore the longitudinal trajectory of tract-specific decline in
these patients.Methods
Participants included in this study were
recruited as part of the Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL)
study, and included AD patients (n=28), MCI patients (n=16), and healthy elderly
control subjects (n=75). Participants underwent MR imaging approximately every
18 months for up to 5 visits (approximately 7.5 years), with data available
from 83 participants at their baseline recruitment time-point, 106 participants
at first follow-up, 90 participants at second follow-up, 82 participants at
third follow-up, 65 participants at fourth follow-up, and 54 participants at
fifth follow-up.
DWI data were acquired on a 3T Siemens Tim
Trio scanner (2.3mm3 isotropic voxels, 60 directions at b=3000s/mm2,
8 b=0 images), and pre-processed. FODs were computed with single-shell, 3-tissue constrained
spherical deconvolution6,7, and spatial correspondence was achieved by creating an unbiased
longitudinal template (first creating intra-subject templates from 10 healthy
controls, 10 MCI, and 10 AD subjects, then using the 30 intra-subject templates
to generate a group-specific population template), and registering all FOD
images to the template. Measures of fibre density (FD), fibre bundle
cross-section (FC), and combined fibre density and cross-section (FDC) were
obtained5. To identify white matter regions that exhibit different
longitudinal trajectories in AD and MCI patients compared to healthy controls,
we compared rate of change in a given fixel-based metric, using the two time-points
that were furthest apart for a given subject, and computed the rate of change
in the metric as follows (as an example, for FDC):
Rate of FDC change = (FDCfinal
timepoint – FDCfirst timepoint)/time interval (years)
Statistical comparisons of rate of change of
each fixel metric between groups were performed with Connectivity-based Fixel
Enhancement (CFE)8 at each fixel using a General Linear Model.
Subsequent tract-of-interest analysis was
performed to explore longitudinal trajectories of FDC within select fibre
tracts across all time-points. These tracts are shown in Figure 2, and were
extract from the template tractogram using inclusion and exclusion
regions-of-interest, and were selected on the basis of previous cross-sectional
work that exhibited reduced FDC in AD patients compared to controls1. Mean FDC within each tract-of-interest was computed for each time-point.
Linear mixed effects models9 were used to determine whether groups differed in FDC change over
time. Random effect of subject was included, while fixed effects of interest included
time (years) from baseline/first MRI, diagnostic group, and time-by-group
interaction. Fixed effects of intracranial volume (ICV), sex, years of
education, and amyloid status were also included. Together, these fixed effects
allowed tract FDC to decline linearly with years from first MRI while testing
the possibility of different trajectories of decline for different groups.Results
Whole-brain FBA revealed extensive white
matter regions that exhibited significantly accelerated decline in FD, FC, and
FDC in AD patients compared to control subjects (Figure 1). These regions
included fibre tracts that were previously shown to exhibit degeneration from
cross-sectional analyses1, such as the cingulum bundle, inferior fronto-occipital, arcuate
and uncinate fasciculi, but were notably more pronounced on the left side than
right. MCI patients did not exhibit significant differences in rate of decline
in any of the fixel-based metrics when compared to control participants.
Longitudinal trajectories in FDC within the select
tracts-of-interest are shown in Figure 2 for each individual, by clinical group,
while mean trajectories for each group are shown in Figure 3. Linear mixed
effects models revealed statistically significant group differences in FDC
changes over time. While significant differences were observed in all tract
trajectories of AD patients compared to controls, effects were quite small
(Table 2), and significant effects were largely driven by lower baseline FDC
(Figure 3). When comparing MCI patients to controls, linear mixed models showed
no significant difference in FDC change over time for any of the fibre tracts, except
the left uncinate fasciculus (p = 0.0037) and the genu of the corpus callosum
(p = 0.0022).Discussion
This
study is the first to our knowledge to investigate longitudinal white matter
disruptions in AD and MCI using advanced diffusion metrics. Our whole-brain FBA
results suggested that specific fixels exhibit accelerated decline in AD
compared to healthy elderly individuals.
However, when mean FDC across tracts was
explored with tract-of-interest analyses, our findings suggested that the
different tract trajectories in AD compared to healthy elderly individuals was
primarily driven by lower baseline levels of tract FDC, rather than substantially
accelerated rates of decline.Acknowledgements
RS is supported by fellowship funding from the National Imaging Facility (NIF), an Australian Government National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy (NCRIS) capability.References
1. Mito
R, Raffelt D, Dhollander T, et al. Fibre-specific white
matter reductions in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Brain
2018;141(3):888–902.
2. Nowrangi MA, Lyketsos CG,
Leoutsakos JM, et al. Longitudinal, region-specific course of diffusion tensor
imaging measures in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease.
Alzheimers Dement 2013;9(5):519–528.
3. Mayo CD, Mazerolle EL,
Ritchie L, et al. Longitudinal changes in microstructural white matter metrics
in Alzheimer’s disease. NeuroImage Clin. 2017;13:330–338.
4. Jones DK. Challenges and
limitations of quantifying brain connectivity in vivo with diffusion MRI.
Imaging Med. 2010;2(3):341–355.
5. Raffelt DA, Tournier J-D,
Smith RE, et al. Investigating white matter fibre density and morphology using
fixel-based analysis. Neuroimage 2017;144:58–73.
6. Dhollander T, Connelly A. A
novel iterative approach to reap the benefits of multi-tissue CSD from just
single-shell (+ b= 0) diffusion MRI data. Proc. Int. Soc. Magn. Reson. Med.
Singapore, Singapore 2016;24:3010.
7. Dhollander T, Raffelt D,
Connelly A. Unsupervised 3-tissue response function estimation from
single-shell or multi-shell diffusion MR data without a co-registered T1 image.
Proc. Int. Soc. Magn. Reson. Med. Work. Break. Barriers Diffus. MRI 2016;5
8. Raffelt DA, Smith RE,
Ridgway GR, et al. Connectivity-based fixel enhancement: Whole-brain
statistical analysis of diffusion MRI measures in the presence of crossing
fibres. Neuroimage 2015;117:40–55.
9. Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker
B, Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. arXiv Prepr.
arXiv1406.5823 2014