Soroush Heidari Pahlavian1,2, Xinhui Wang 2, Samantha Ma1,2, John Ringman2, Helena Chui2, Danny J.J. Wang1,2, and Lirong Yan1,2
1USC Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States, 2Department of Neurology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
Synopsis
Elevated cerebroarterial pulsations
due to arterial stiffness can impart abnormal forces to downstream capillary/tissue
leading to microvascular damage, which are thought to be a contributing factor
in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease
and small vessel disease. In this study, we assessed the utility of
two-dimensional (2D) phase-contrast MRI (PC-MRI) in quantifying cerebroarterial
pulsations and evaluated the associations of pulsatile and non-pulsatile
hemodynamic measures with cognitive performance and white matter hyperintensity
(WMH). Our results indicated significant associations of PC-MRI derived pulsatility
metrics with cognitive performance and WMH.
Introduction
Cerebrovascular risk factors are
thought to play an important role in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative
disorders such as dementia and Alzheimer's disease (AD)1-3.
Increased pulsatility of cerebral arteries has been found to be associated with
cognitive decline in AD patients and has been suggested to be involved in
conversion to dementia in subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI)4,5. Cerebroarterial pulsatility
measures have been evaluated previously using transcranial doppler (TCD)
sonography4,6,7.
However, the efficient application of TCD depends on the availability of an
acoustic window through the skull, which is known to be limited in older
subjects8.
In this study, we assessed the utility of 2D PC-MRI in quantifying
cerebroarterial pulsations and evaluated the associations of pulsatile and
non-pulsatile hemodynamic measures with cognitive performance and white matter
hyperintensity (WMH).Methods
Participants and Imaging
protocols: Fifty individuals (36 female, 69.1±6.9 years) were recruited.
Participants underwent clinical and neurocognitive assessments, including the
global clinical dementia rating (CDR)9 and the Montreal cognitive
assessment (MoCA) test10.
MRI measurements were carried out on a Siemens Prisma 3T Scanner.
Blood flow waveforms of internal carotid arteries (ICAs) were measured using an
ECG-triggered 2D PC-MRI sequence (resolution=0.5×0.5×5.0 mm3,
VENC=100 cm/s, TE/TR=4.86/49.25 ms, flip angle=15°, figure 1-a). Whole-brain global
cerebral blood flow (gCBF) was measured using pCASL with 3D GRASE sequence (TR/TE=4300/36.76ms,
labeling duration=1.5s, post labeling delay=2000ms, number of slices=48,
resolution=2.5×2.5×2.5 mm). A three-dimensional T2‐weighted FLAIR sequence was also
performed to assess WMH. 24 subjects underwent test-retest PC-MRI scans with ~6
weeks apart.
Data analysis and statistics:
PC-MRI data were processed using an in-house software written in MATLAB. For
each PC-MRI dataset, an ROI encompassing the ICA was generated by thresholding
the structural image
and was applied to the corresponding phase images to obtain ICA blood flow
waveform (Q) across a cardiac cycle. Mean flow rate (Qmean), pulsatility
index (PI), and resistivity index (RI) were calculated as follows:
$$PI=\frac{Q_{max}-Q_{min}}{Q_{mean}}$$
$$RI=\frac{Q_{max}-Q_{min}}{Q_{max}}$$
WMH volumes were measured on FLAIR images using the
semi-automatic segmentation tool in ITK-SNAP11.Repeatability
of PI and RI was evaluated using the Bland-Altman analysis and intraclass
correlation coefficient (ICC). Generalized Estimating Equations method was used
to assess associations (i) between MRI-measured cerebral hemodynamics
parameters (PI, RI, mean flow rate, and gCBF) and cognitive performance (MoCA
and CDR scores) and (ii) between cerebral hemodynamic parameters and WMH
volume. All regression models were adjusted for age and gender. Regression
models involving cognitive performance scores were additionally adjusted for
years of education. The capability of various hemodynamic measures in
distinguishing participants with cognitive impairment (CDR=0.5) was assessed using
receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves.Results
Close correlations and high ICC values were observed between
repeated measurements of PI (r=0.93, ICC=0.92) and RI (r=0.91,
ICC=0.91) indicating a good test-retest reproducibility for these measurements
(figure 2). Elevated RI was significantly associated with cognitive decline
quantified using MoCA (p=0.04, Figure 3) and global CDR (p=0.02, Figure 4-a) with adjustments for age, gender, and education. From the ROC
analysis, the area under curve (AUC) was significantly different from 0.5 only
for RI (AUC=0.7, p=0.04), indicating better sensitivity to cognitive
decline for RI, compared to PI and other non-pulsatile hemodynamic measures
(Figure 4-b). PI and RI were both significantly associated with WMH volume (p=0.02, p=0.01, respectively, Figure 5). However, non-pulsatile
hemodynamic measures including mean flow rate and gCBF were not associated with
either cognitive impairment or WMH volume.Discussion
The results of the present cross-sectional study suggest
that PC-MRI-derived cerebroarterial pulsatility and resistivity indices are
associated with cognitive performance and WMH. While the mechanistic link
between arterial pulsation and cognitive impairment is not clear yet, it has
been suggested that excessive arterial pulsatility can impair cerebral
microcirculation by inducing elevated pulsatile stress and hypoperfusion12,13.The
significant correlation observed in the current study between PC-MRI-measured
RI and cognitive decline is in line with previous findings from TCD studies11,12 and further supports the notion
that the increased cerebrovascular resistance and stiffness can lead to
vascular and metabolic damages to the brain.
Our results showed no significant association between gCBF or
mean arterial flow rate and cognitive performance, suggesting that in elderly
subjects with mild cognitive impairment, global measures of cerebral blood flow
might not be strong cerebrovascular-based indicators of cognitive dysfunction. Our
results bear witness to the hypothesis that the increased arterial stiffness
and the resulting increase in cerebrovascular pulsatility can act as a
protective mechanism to maintain global perfusion, as greater cerebroarterial
pulsatility allows higher mean flow rate to be generated for an unchanged mean
arterial blood pressure14.
Our finding that PC-MRI-measured PI and RI are associated
with the measures of WMH severity indicates that cerebroarterial pulsatility
might contribute to cerebral microvascular and brain tissue damage. Consistent
with our results, the increased cerebroarterial pulsation has been suggested to
cause perivascular shear stress and damage to oligodendrocytes causing
dysfunction of the perivascular glymphatic system15.Conclusion
This study showed that the cerebroarterial pulsatile measures
obtained using PC-MRI are more sensitive indicators of cognitive impairment
compared to global blood flow measurement and as such, might be useful as
potential biomarkers of cerebrovascular dysfunction in neurodegenerative
disorders.Acknowledgements
This work is supported by NIH grants of K25-AG056594 and UH2-NS100614,
and American Heart Association (AHA) grant 16SDG29630013.References
1. Jellinger, K. Alzheimer disease and cerebrovascular
pathology: an update. Journal of neural transmission 109, 813-836 (2002).
2. Knopman, D.S. Cerebrovascular disease and dementia.
The British journal of radiology 80 Spec No 2, S121-127 (2007).
3. Stampfer, M. Cardiovascular disease and Alzheimer's
disease: common links. Journal of internal medicine 260, 211-223 (2006).
4. Tomek, A., Urbanova, B. & Hort, J. Utility of
transcranial ultrasound in predicting Alzheimer's disease risk. Journal of
Alzheimer's Disease 42, S365-S374 (2014).
5. Chung, C.-P., Lee, H.-Y., Lin, P.-C. & Wang, P.-N.
Cerebral artery pulsatility is associated with cognitive impairment and
predicts dementia in individuals with subjective memory decline or mild
cognitive impairment. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 60, 625-632 (2017).
6. Desmidt, T., et al. Ultrasound Measures of Brain
Pulsatility Correlate with Subcortical Brain Volumes in Healthy Young Adults.
Ultrasound in medicine & biology 44, 2307-2313 (2018).
7. Aribisala, B.S., et al. Blood pressure, internal
carotid artery flow parameters, and age-related white matter hyperintensities.
Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) 63, 1011-1018 (2014).
8. Suri, M.F., et al. Estimated prevalence of acoustic
cranial windows and intracranial stenosis in the US elderly population:
ultrasound screening in adults for intracranial disease study.
Neuroepidemiology 37, 64-71 (2011).
9. Morris, J.C. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR).
Current version and scoring rules 43, 2412-2412-a (1993).
10. Nasreddine, Z.S., et al. The Montreal Cognitive
Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal
of the American Geriatrics Society 53, 695-699 (2005).
11. Yushkevich, P.A., et al. User-guided 3D active contour
segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and
reliability. NeuroImage 31, 1116-1128 (2006).
12. de Riva, N., et al. Transcranial Doppler pulsatility
index: what it is and what it isn't. Neurocritical care 17, 58-66 (2012).
13. Calviello, L.A., et al. Relationship Between Brain
Pulsatility and Cerebral Perfusion Pressure: Replicated Validation Using
Different Drivers of CPP Change. Neurocritical care 27, 392-400 (2017).
14. Rickards, C.A. & Tzeng, Y.-C. Arterial pressure
and cerebral blood flow variability: friend or foe? A review. Front Physiol 5,
120-120 (2014).
15. Jolly, T.A., et al. Early detection of microstructural
white matter changes associated with arterial pulsatility. Frontiers in human
neuroscience 7, 782 (2013).