Tae Kim1, Annie Cohen1, and James T Becker1
1University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
Synopsis
Brain atrophy is highly
associated with cardiac pulsatility in the brain. The reduction of brain
regional volumes was correlated with increased pulsatility of its supply arteries
and a decrease of sinus and CSF. The regional volume reduction was affected by the
pulsatility of different vessels.
INTRODUCTION
An increase
of central arterial pulsatility is associated with structural changes in the
brain1. High pulsatilty in arteries raises persistent stress to the microvascular
system of capillaries and can cause damage to brain tissue. The cardiac
pulsation signal generated from the heartbeat is delivered to the brain, along with
vascular trees, and CSF. Because different brain regions have locally different
vascular supply and drainage, the structural integrity of each region may be
affected by pulsation of different vessels. We investigated the relationship
between central arterial pulsatility and brain volumetric changes, as well as
the spatial dependency of pulsatility on each regional volume change.METHODS
108 participants (ages: 66.5±8.4 with range of
50-87yrs, 68 females) were studied at 3T (Siemens, Prisma) using
a 64-channel head coil. Subjects were 52 normal
controls, 17 impaired without complaints, 11 subjective cognitive decline, 19
MCIs, and 9 ADs. 0.8 mm isotropic 3D T1- and T2-weighted images were acquired. rs-fMRI
data were obtained with a GE-EPI with TR/TE
= 800/37ms, voxel size = 2mm isotropic, FA = 52°, MB-acceleration-factor
=8, and 72 slices with 420 volumes. The scanner provided a TTL
pulse output for each slice to synchronize the cardiac cycle and MRI data. 8 separate
sessions of rs-fMRI were acquired.
The volumetric measurements for each brain region were
performed by Freesurfer 6.0 after alignment of the T1- and T2-weighted images,
bias field correction, removal of gradient nonlinearity, and readout distortion.
All regional volumes were adjusted for total intracranial volume.
To generate the cardiac pulsatile template map, the
2nd-order Fourier series (Σi ai·sin(i·θ)+bi·cos(i·θ),i=1,2) of the
cardiac phase time courses with 6 motion parameters was fit to each voxel of image data2. Then,
each voxel was calculated from the coefficients by sqrt(Σi [(ai/SEi)2+(bi/SEi)2]), where
SE is standard error of the
coefficients. This value indicates
the amplitude of cardiac-coupled pulsatile signal in the brain. To determine a meaningful
cardiac pulsatile map, a null statistic distribution was created by a Monte
Carlo technique of regressing random phase data for an arbitrary noise model.
The null statistic distribution was used to find the threshold for 3σ significance. For group
analyses, each subject’s cardiac pulsatile map was transformed to MNI space,
and the voxels within the brain mask were spatially normalized as Z-scores so
that each individual’s map was on the same scale. The cardiac pulsatile data were
then generated as a two-dimensional matrix (brain voxels x subjects). The
LASSO-PCR approach3 was performed with a set of voxels in the
cardiac pulsatile map as a regressor and the subjects’ age and regional volumes
as the outcome. For cross-validation, the observed data were divided into
training and test data. The training data were used to create the regression
model, with
estimation of voxel weights; the test data were
applied to evaluate prediction accuracy. The fitting of the regression model was
evaluated using a leave-one-out method. To test the overall significance of the
model and ensure that cross-validated prediction errors were unbiased, we
performed 1000 iterations of permutation test on the LASSO-PCR.RESULTS
Fig. 1 demonstrates the group averaged
cardiac pulsatility map. Large vessels and CSF regions were localized. Fig. 2 shows
the high correlation between the original and the predicted data in age,
hippocampal region, and lateral ventricle region. Other brain regions of ventralDC,
brainstem, accumbens, thalamus, and 3rd ventricle shows r > 0.6
between the original and the predicted volume. Amygdala, isthmus cingulate, parahippocampal parsorbitalis, postcentral
superior frontal, and superior temporal regions show moderate
correlation (r> 0.3), indicating the volume change of these
regions are associated with the cardiac pulsatility.
Fig.3 shows the spatial
distribution of the cardiac pulsatile associated with regional volume in the
brain. Reduction of hippocampal volume was related to an increased pulsatility
of the insular artery (IA), posterior cerebral artery, and a decreased
pulsatility of lenticulostriate arteries (LSA) and lateral ventricle (LV).
VentralDC and brain stem, two adjacent areas, shows positive correlation with
LV, sagittal sinus (SS), and LSA, and negative correlation with prepontine
cistern (PC) and IA. The pulsatility of the PC is likely
synchronized with that of the basilar artery. Accumbens is related negatively
with IA and PCA and positively with LSA, SS, and LV. Since the volume of the
ventricles is inversely correlated with that of deep gray matter regions, the
opposite relationship of pulsatility was observed with the gray matter. The
overall spatial dependency showed that gray matter volumes were negative
correlation with the pulsatility of arterial vessels and positive correlation
with the pulsatility of sinus and CSF regions. The additional labels in Fig. 2 are
ACA: anterior cerebral
artery, PS: petrosal sinus, CA: cerebral Aqueduct, CM: cistern magna, ICV:
internal cerebral vein.DISCUSSION
The brain is vulnerable to increased arterial
pulsatility4,5. Increased
arterial stiffness with normal aging is inversely related with increased
arterial pulsatility6. Each
regional volume was associated with a different area of the cardiac pulsatile
map. The pulsation of supply arteries appears to have influence on regional structural
integrity. CONCLUSION
The cardiac pulsatility in the
brain is highly associated with brain regional volume. Each region was affected
by different regions of pulsatility.Acknowledgements
This work was supported by
the National Institutes of Health (UF1-AG051197).References
1.
Mitchell,
Arterial stiffness, pressure and flow pulsatility and brain structure and
function: the Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility--Reykjavik study. Brain. 2011
2.
Glover, Image-Based
Method for Retrospective Correction of Physiological Motion Effects in fMRI:
RETROICOR. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 44:162–167 (2000)
3.
Wager TD, Atlas LY,
Leotti LA, Rilling JK. Predicting individual differences in placebo analgesia:
contributions of brain activity during anticipation and pain experience. The
Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.
2011; 31(2):439–52
4. Webb, A. J. S. et al.
Increased cerebral arterial pulsatility in patients with leukoaraiosis:
arterial stiffness enhances transmission of aortic pulsatility. Stroke 43,
2631–2636 (2012).
5. Wohlfahrt, P. et al.
Large artery stiffness and carotid flow pulsatility in stroke survivors. J.
Hypertens. 32, 1097–1103;
6. Wagshul ME1, Eide PK, Madsen
JR. The
pulsating brain: A review of experimental and clinical studies of intracranial
pulsatility. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2011 Jan
18;8(1):5.