Yury Koush1, Robin A. de Graaf1, Ron Kupers2, Laurence Dricot3, Maurice Ptito4, Kevin Behar1, Douglas L. Rothman1, and Fahmeed Hyder1
1Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States, 2University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, 3University of Louvain, Louvain, Belgium, 4School of Optometry, Montreal, QC, Canada
Synopsis
Functional MRI using blood oxygenation level
dependent (BOLD) contrast identifies brain regions for task-induced (de)activation
paradigms. We investigated the metabolic basis of these paradigms in activated
(visual cortex, VC) and deactivated (posterior cingulate cortex, PCC) network nodes using concurrent acquisitions of J-edited lactate/GABA(γ-aminobutyric acid)/Glx(pooled
glutamate and glutamine) and diffusion-weighted
BOLD signal. In VC, we detected increased BOLD/lactate/glutamate,
and decreased GABA, whereas in PCC BOLD decreased, GABA increased but lactate/glutamate
did not change. These results suggest that BOLD responses in (de)activated
areas is regulated by relatively rapid GABAergic inhibition, whereas aerobic
glycolysis and glutamatergic activity dominate in activated nodes.
Abstract
Introduction: In task-based functional
MRI (fMRI) studies, a task-positive region is where BOLD signal is greater
during experimental versus rest epochs, and a task-negative region is where the
BOLD signal is greater during rest versus experimental epochs1. The task-negative
region is also referred to as the default mode network (DMN). In neurological
and neurodegenerative conditions, the normal function of activated (e.g., motor
or sensory network) and deactivated (e.g., default mode network, DMN) nodes is
altered. However, in normal brain, it remains unknown how aerobic glycolysis
and excitatory-inhibitory balance vary across activated and deactivated
networks. Here we investigated the
metabolic basis of (de)activation paradigms in non-DMN and DMN areas using concurrent fMRI-fMRS acquisitions of J-edited2
lactate and GABA(γ-aminobutyric acid)/Glx(pooled glutamate and glutamine co-edited with GABA) and diffusion-weighted BOLD signal.
Methods: Twenty healthy volunteers (10
male, age 29±2) participated in two fMRI and two fMRI-fMRS runs spanning over three
days. First, we used fMRI at 3T to localize the visual cortex (VC, non-DMN
area) and the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC, DMN area), using activation
(visual flashing checkerboard) and deactivation (auditory emotion perception)
paradigms, respectively. The fMRI and fMRI-fMRS runs consisted of three 2.7min VC
(or PCC) stimulation epochs interleaved with three 2.7min fixation (or rest) epochs,
respectively. For VC activation paradigm, the whole-screen flashing (8Hz)
checkerboard was used as visual stimuli (visual angle 15×18°). Subjects were
asked to fixate a grey dot in the center of the screen and press a response
button when the dot’s color changed to green3.
For PCC deactivation paradigm, participants listened to short sentences
audio-emotion portrayals4 with eyes closed,
and they were asked to press the response button each time a specific emotion,
contempt, disgust or surprise, was identified, which occurred 3-5 times per
activation epoch. Bilateral VC and PCC (de)activations were identified using statistical
parametric mapping (SPM12). A single fMRI-fMRS voxel was placed around the
identified VC and PCC areas. All experiments were performed at the MRRC (Yale University) on a 3T
Siemens Prisma scanner using 64-channels head coil (whole-brain fMRI) and 4T Bruker spectrometer single-channel
quadrature surface head coil (concurrent
single-voxel fMRI-fMRS). For fMRI, we used gradient-echo T2*-weighted EPI
(648 scans, TR = 1.5s, TE = 30ms, 2mm3 voxels). Prior to fMRI-fMRS
acquisitions, we acquired B0 field map and water spectrum, adjusted basic
frequency and shimming globally and locally, and optimized RF power. For fMRI-fMRS
we used J-difference editing (180 paired spectra, TR = 2.7s, TE = 144ms/70ms, ~14mL
VC and ~25mL PCC voxels. Each pair of the water-suppressed J-edited spectra was
followed by the diffusion-weighted STEAM5 water spectra
acquisition (TE = 20ms, b = 1400s/mm2) with 200ms delay between the
two MRS acquisitions. J-edited spectra were corrected for a basic frequency
drift, aligned, phase-corrected, apodized (gaussian 2Hz, exponential 2Hz) and
averaged. Individual spectra were centered and aligned to the group average
reference NAA peak. The residual BOLD linewidth narrowing was estimated using
line-shape differences in NAA peak between the (de)activation and rest and nulled
using exponential linewidth adjustment. The same corrections were applied to J-edited
sum and difference spectra. Lactate/GABA/glutamate levels were estimated using
LCM quantification and normalized to the corresponding NAA levels (CRLB<20)6. STEAM water
spectra underwent the same spectra preprocessing procedure. To estimate the T2*,
we applied water peak linewidth linear approximation using logarithm of the
water FID7.
Results: Whole-brain fMRI revealed expected VC activation
and PCC deactivations, which was in good agreement with BOLD changes estimated
from single-voxel fMRI-fMRS data (Fig.1A).
In fMRI-fMRS VC runs, we found a significant increase
of BOLD (1.16±0.08%), Glx (3.0±0.5% from baseline
level 1.50±0.05 a.u.) and lactate (7.8±1.2% from baseline level 0.99±.03 mM)
during visual stimulation as compared to fixation, and a decrease of GABA (-5.7±0.7%
from baseline level 2.22±0.07 mM) (Fig.
1B-D). In fMRI-fMRS PCC runs, we found a significant decrease of BOLD (0.42±0.06%),
and an increase of GABA (4.9±1.4% from baseline level 2.26±0.07 mM) during
auditory emotional stimulation as compared to rest, but no lactate and Glx changes
(Fig. 1B-D). Glx levels are in a.u.
due to the J-editing optimal set for GABA. Of note, VC activation-induced glutamate
and lactate changes were in good agreement with prior (non-)edited spectra8-13.
Lactate and β-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) are co-edited14,
however we did not observe significant changes in BHB.
Discussion and Conclusion: Our findings strengthen the link between
hemodynamic response, aerobic glycolysis, and inhibitory-excitatory activities.
We found that functional rise of aerobic glycolysis and glutamatergic activity is
specific to activated nodes, however, relatively rapid similar inhibitory
mechanisms affect BOLD responses in activated and deactivated areas. The
observed GABA level could be a consequence of phasic and tonic release
occurring at the synaptic level. Our study highlights the importance of the
concurrent fMRI-fMRS acquisitions for unveiling neurometabolic basis of the
(de)activated network nodes and interpretation of neural activity by
neurochemistry and hemodynamics in health and disease.Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the
Swiss National Science Foundation (P300PB_161083) and the National Institute of
Health, USA (R01 NS-100106, R01 MH-067528, R21 MH-110862, P30 NS-052519).References
1 Buckner, R. L., Andrews-Hanna, J. R. &
Schacter, D. L. The brain's default network: anatomy, function, and relevance
to disease. Annals of the New York
Academy of Sciences 1124, 1-38,
doi:10.1196/annals.1440.011 (2008).
2 Rothman, D. L., Behar, K. L., Hetherington,
H. P. & Shulman, R. G. Homonuclear 1H double-resonance difference
spectroscopy of the rat brain in vivo. Proceedings
of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 81, 6330-6334 (1984).
3 Bianciardi, M. et al. Modulation of spontaneous fMRI activity in human visual
cortex by behavioral state. Neuroimage
45, 160-168,
doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.034 (2009).
4 Banziger, T., Mortillaro, M. & Scherer,
K. R. Introducing the Geneva Multimodal expression corpus for experimental
research on emotion perception. Emotion
12, 1161-1179, doi:10.1037/a0025827
(2012).
5 Frahm, J., Merboldt, K. D. & Hanicke, W.
Localized Proton Spectroscopy Using Stimulated Echoes. J Magn Reson 72,
502-508, doi:Doi 10.1016/0022-2364(87)90154-5 (1987).
6 Provencher, S. W. Automatic quantitation of
localized in vivo 1H spectra with LCModel. NMR
in biomedicine 14, 260-264
(2001).
7 Koush, Y., Elliott, M. A., Scharnowski, F.
& Mathiak, K. Real-time automated spectral assessment of the BOLD response
for neurofeedback at 3 and 7T. Journal of
neuroscience methods 218,
148-160, doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.05.002 (2013).
8 Koush, Y., de Graaf, R. A., Jiang, L.,
Rothman, D. L. & Hyder, F. Functional MRS with J-edited lactate in human
motor cortex at 4T. Neuroimage,
doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.008 (2018).
9 Kurcyus, K. et al. Opposite Dynamics of GABA and Glutamate Levels in the
Occipital Cortex during Visual Processing. The
Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience
38, 9967-9976,
doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1214-18.2018 (2018).
10 Chen, C.
et al. Activation induced changes in GABA: Functional MRS at 7T with
MEGA-sLASER. Neuroimage 156, 207-213,
doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.05.044 (2017).
11 Mekle, R.
et al. Detection of metabolite changes in response to a varying visual
stimulation paradigm using short-TE (1) H MRS at 7 T. NMR in biomedicine 30,
doi:10.1002/nbm.3672 (2017).
12 Schaller, B., Xin, L., O'Brien, K., Magill, A.
W. & Gruetter, R. Are glutamate and lactate increases ubiquitous to
physiological activation? A (1)H functional MR spectroscopy study during motor
activation in human brain at 7Tesla. Neuroimage
93 Pt 1, 138-145 (2014).
13 Bednarik, P.
et al. Neurochemical and BOLD responses during neuronal activation measured
in the human visual cortex at 7 Tesla. Journal
of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International
Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism 35, 601-610, doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2014.233 (2015).
14 Koush, Y., de Graaf, R. A., Jiang, L., Rothman,
D. L. & Hyder, F. Functional MRS with J-edited lactate in human motor
cortex at 4T. Neuroimage 184, 101-108,
doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.008 (2019).