Jonghyun Bae1,2, Li Feng3, Krzysztof Geras4, Florian Knoll4, Yulin Ge4,5, and Sungheon Gene Kim4,5
1Sackler Institute of Graduate Biomedical Science,NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States, 2Radiology, Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research, New York, NY, United States, 3Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States, 4Center for Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research, New York, NY, United States, 5Center for Biomedical Imaging, NYU, New York, NY, United States
Synopsis
This study proposes a deep learning approach of estimating
the capillary level of input function for kinetic model analysis on dynamic
contrast enhanced (DCE)-MRI data. Our deep-learning network was trained with
the numerically synthesized data generated with a wide range of contrast
kinetic dynamics with different arterial input function (AIF). We hypothesize
that the voxel level capillary input functions would be more accurate input
functions for pharmacokinetic analysis. This hypothesis was tested with the
DCE-MRI data of healthy subjects.
Purpose
Dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)-MRI have been used as a
quantitative tool for investigating tissue microstructures asociated with
various brain pathologies, such as brain tumor, stroke, and multiple sclerosis.1
When analyzing the DCE-MRI data, pharmacokinetic models (PKM), such as the
extended-Tofts or the Patlak model, are often used to estimate the pharmacokinetic
(PK) parameters that would quantify the micro-environment of tissues. All of
these PKM require an input function, generally referred as the arterial input
function (AIF). Most studies typically use a global AIF (Ca), either
measured at the artery level from the data or from a population-based model. This
selection of AIF is often very difficult to reproduce, and the variability in
the AIF directly result in errors in estimation of PK parameters.2 Furthermore,
using a global AIF assumes the same input function for all voxels in the tissue,
which may not hold true if the model does not incorporate the flow with delay
and dispersion from the artery to the tissue compartment. This study endeavors
to develop a deep learning network that could predict the pixel-level capillary
input function (CIF) (Cp) to aid more accurate PK estimation without
using AIF. The proposed method was applied to assess the blood brain barrier
(BBB) permeability.Methods
Deep Learning Network: A U-Net like structure was adopted to estimate the CIF with a
set of DCE-MRI data from a small patch as the input. As depicted in Figure 1,
there are 3 blocks of convolutional layers paired with ReLU activation for
descending direction, where the number of filters decrease. Then in the
ascending track, the skipping connections were made just like in the original
U-Net structure. The training data were synthesized using a PKM with a wide
range of PKM parameters and different variations of the population-based AIF
suggested by Parker et.al.3 First, the CIF was calculated, assuming
a single compartment model with transfer from the artery to the capillary. This
was served as the ground-truth when training the network. Then the extended
Tofts model4 was used to simulate 10-min long tissue dynamics for a
small patch with the size of 3-by-3 voxels. For each patch, specific tissue
type such as the gray-matter, white-matter, and randomly placed vascular
voxels and its' associated PK value were assigned in
accordance with the values found in literatures. The total of 50,000 patches
were generated, of which 45,000 were used as the training data and 5,000
patches were used as the validation data.
GRASP-Pro:
The DCE-MR signal in a normal brain tissue shows only a small
enhancement, due to the intact BBB. Measurement of such small enhancement is
not trivial, since the low enhancement is often obscured by the noise and
hinders the PK estimation. The GRASP-Pro, recently developed by Li. et al5,
has been adopted to improve the temporal characteristics. The GRASP-Pro
approach improves the reconstructed image quality using the temporal bases selected
from the principal component analysis of low-resolution GRASP reconstruction.
Clinical Study: To evaluate the performance of the network, we compared the PK
estimation from the DCE-MRI data acquired at 3T. Healthy volunteers (n=6; ages
of 30~78) were recruited for DCE-MRI scan of 28 minutes long. The data were
cropped to the first 10 minute, to match the similar temporal window as the
training data and also to assess whether the data with a shorter duration can
be used to measure the BBB permeability. The raw k-space data were
reconstructed with GRASP-Pro. The Cp for each voxel was predicted
using the trained deep learning network. For the PKM analysis, the graphical Patlak
model (GPM)6 was used to estimate the volume fraction of plasma (Vp) and the permeability
surface area product (PS). The GPM
analysis was conducted with both Cp from the trained network and Ca
measured from the middle cerebral artery from the image. From the estimated Vp and PS maps, the average
plasma volume fraction and PS of the gray and white matters were calculated
using the masks shown in Figure 3. Result
Figure 2 shows the estimated Vp maps using both Ca and predicted Cp.
The Vp values estimated
with Ca seems to be underestimated than those values estimated with
Cp. The average Vp
values of both GM and WM are underestimated with Ca as compared to
the literature values.7 In contrast, the GPM analysis with Cp,
provides the blood volume closer to the literature values. Figure 4
demonstrates a sample fit of GM and WM voxel. The fit using Cp shows
clearly a better fit than the fit using Ca.Discussion and Conclusion
The proposed deep-learning network to estimate
the CIF has demonstrated promising performance for accurately estimating PK
parameters. As expected, the global AIF measured in the artery is not valid for
the assumptions underlying in the some of the PKM, such as the Patlak model,
that the GBCA concentration in the capillary is same as AIF. This assumption is
more challenged when the scan time is reduced, as demonstrated in this study.
The proposed deep-learning based approach of generate CIF also removes the need
to measure AIF, which can reduce the variability in the outcome and yields
higher reproducibility. Acknowledgements
Alzheimer’s Association Grant AARF-17-533484, NIH
R01CA160620, R01CA219964, and UG3CA228699.References
1. Heye AK, Culling RD, Valdes Hernandez
Mdel C, Thrippleton MJ, Wardlaw JM. Assessment of blood-brain barrier
disruption using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. A systematic review. NeuroImage
Clinical. 2014;6:262-74. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2014.09.002. PubMed PMID:
25379439; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4215461.
2. Azahaf M, Haberley M, Betrouni N, Ernst
O, Behal H, Duhamel A, et al. Impact of arterial input function selection on
the accuracy of dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI quantitative analysis
for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer. Journal of
Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2016;43(3):737-49.
3. Parker GJ, Roberts C, Macdonald A,
Buonaccorsi GA, Cheung S, Buckley DL, Jackson A, Watson Y, Davies K, Jayson GC.
Experimentally-derived functional form for a population-averaged
high-temporal-resolution arterial input function for dynamic contrast-enhanced
MRI. Magnetic resonance in medicine. 2006;56(5):993-1000. doi:
10.1002/mrm.21066. PubMed PMID: 17036301.
4. Tofts PS. Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd‐DTPA
MR imaging. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging. 1997 Jan;7(1):91-101.
5. Feng L, Wen Q, Huang C, Tong A, Liu F, Chandarana H. GRASP‐Pro:
imProving GRASP DCE‐MRI through self‐calibrating subspace‐modeling
and contrast phase automation. Magnetic resonance in medicine. 2020
Jan;83(1):94-108.
6. Patlak CS, Blasberg RG,
Fenstermacher JD. Graphical evaluation of blood-to-brain transfer constants
from multiple-time uptake data. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1983;3(1):1-7. doi:
10.1038/jcbfm.1983.1. PubMed PMID: 6822610.
7. Leenders
KL, Perani D, Lammertsma AA, Heather JD, Buckingham P, Jones T, Healy MJ, Gibbs
JM, Wise RJ, Hatazawa J, Herold S. Cerebral blood flow, blood volume and oxygen
utilization: normal values and effect of age. Brain. 1990 Feb 1;113(1):27-47.