Clarissa Zimmerman Cooley1,2, Patrick C McDaniel1,3, Jason P Stockmann1,2, Farrah J Mateen2,4, and Lawrence L Wald1,2,5
1Athinoula A Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Dept. of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States, 2Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States, 3Dept. of Electrical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States, 4Dept. of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States, 5Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States
Synopsis
Lumbar
Punctures (LP) are generally guided by palpation only without visualization of the
internal anatomy, leading to repeat attempts and/or avoidance in difficult
cases. Image guidance with US and X-ray is possible, but US has poor depth and CSF
contrast and radiation from X-ray complicates Point of Care (POC) use. We present a magnet design for a POC MR
guided LP device that will couple to a mechanical track for needle insertion.
The single-sided magnet is an NdFeB array and achieves a 40mT field and ~50mT/m
built-in gradient in the ROI. Simulations of the magnet and imaging procedure
are presented.
Introduction
In this work, we simulate the feasibility of a light-weight
single-sided MR device that can pre-image the relevant anatomy needed to guide
lumbar puncture (LP) in a point-of-care (POC) setting. Our goal is to reduce
barriers to performing this important diagnostic and drug delivery procedure
outside central hospital settings, expanding its availability to a broader
range of healthcare locations and increasingly inexpert staff. While already routinely used to diagnose
several conditions, the need for routine LP is poised to dramatically expand in
the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease1-5 where protein
CSF biomarkers accessed through LP have emerged
as a premiere diagnostic tool for predicting future progression. LP
is also expected to see increasing use for CNS delivery of gene editing
therapies and drugs that have poor blood brain barrier penetration6.
Although routinely performed, LP is conventionally guided by
palpation without visualization of the internal anatomy. This leads to
clinician anxiety and avoidance and repeated puncture attempts in difficult
cases7. Ultrasound and x-ray have been used to guide LP, but both have
significant shortcomings. Ultrasound imaging cannot see the CSF target and the
ionizing nature of x rays is difficult to manage in routine POC use. In
contrast, our proposed MR-guided LP device could both streamline LP within a
hospital and enable it to be performed outside central hospital settings or by
inexpert staff.
Our proposed device integrates a lightweight (<25kg)
device for MRI of the spine and surrounding tissues with mechanically-constrained
22-gauge needle insertion, thereby guaranteeing registration between the image
and needle path without requiring real-time imaging of the needle (Fig. 1). During
use, the practitioner positions the MR-guidance device’s central ~2cm diameter
needle insertion hole over the standard needle entry mark between L4 and L5 (Figure
1). Next, a set of anatomical T2 weighted images is acquired, on
which the expected path of the needle is plotted. Based on the image plan, a mechanical
needle guidance track is set to the planned path avoiding vertebrae and any
calcifications in the ligamentum flavum. The maximum depth is planned to just
enter the T2-bright subarachnoid space. With the angulation and depth-stop set, the
practitioner manually pushes the needle in along this track.
Methods
We
optimize and simulate a magnet array consisting of N=248 N52-NdFeB magnets
arranged in two layers in concentric rings and arcs (Fig. 2). Individual magnet
blocks are all 25.4x[y]x25.4mm3 where the [y]-dimensions were
numerically optimized in a continuous range of 0-25.4mm. The magnet was
designed with symmetry about the XY and XZ planes to produce an x-oriented B0
field gradient (ie into the patient’s back).
The sizes and angular orientations of the magnet blocks were
optimized to produce a 4x6x8 cm3 homogeneous magnetic field along
the spine at a depth of 8cm from the magnet surface and overlaying the adult
L3-L5 spine (Fig. 1). The optimization was performed with the Matlab fmincon
tool with: cost function – range of B0
magnitude (fcost=range{|B0|}), computed at points on a
1cm3 grid within the ROI; constraints
- mean |B0| >= 40mT, 0<=y<=25.4mm. Magnet blocks were
modeled as L=5 multipole field sources for field computation during optimization.
Simulated B0 maps for the optimized design were computed using
BiotSavart simulation software (Ripplon).
The magnet is designed to acquire a ~3 minute duration 3D
RARE spin-echo image with the Gx ~ 50mT/m built-in read-out
gradient, Gy phase encoding along the echo-train, and Gz phase
encoding shot-to-shot. A 2D imaging
simulation was performed using the XZ field-map shown in Fig. 3 for Gx
and a linear planar gradient coil producing Gz = 8mT/m peak for the Z
phase encode. The simulation FOV is 4cm
x 8cm, with 256 readout points, BW = 50KHz, and 97 phase-encodes in Z. Results
Figure
2 shows the preliminary magnet design for the single-side LP device with the
simulated B0 field shown as 0.5mT iso-contours. The resulting magnet
measures 8x42x50 cm3, contains 24.2kg of rare-earth material, and
produces a mean field of 40.9mT in the target ROI. Figure 3 shows the simulated
magnetic field-maps in the 3 cartesian planes with white boxes indicating the
target ROI. We note that this initial
design is only preliminary since some magnet blocks intersect and the needle
gap may be too small; issues requiring added constraints to the optimization
procedure.
Figure 4 shows the image simulation results. The simulation object is a T2-weighted
MR image of the target ROI (around the subarachnoid space between L4 and
L5). The simulated image exhibits
aliasing due to the non-bijective pattern in the B0 field-map.
However, the L4/L5 region is clear and could enable mechanical guidance via the
needle track. The aliasing could potentially be addressed using multiple
surface coils and/or by optimizing the magnet with a cost function that
includes encoding performance.Conclusion
We
present a preliminary design for a single-sided 40mT magnet for MR guided
lumbar puncture. Future work includes
refinement of the optimization and design of gradient coils for phase encoding
in the Y and Z dimension using a current stream BEM method to optimize for
linearity8. We believe this system
could provide image-guidance for LPs and greatly facilitate the procedure in difficult cases.Acknowledgements
Funding
from NIH NIBIB R01EB018976 and 5T32EB1680.References
1. Hansson, O., et al., Association between CSF biomarkers and incipient Alzheimer's disease in
patients with mild cognitive impairment: a follow-up study. Lancet Neurol,
2006. 5(3): p. 228-34.
2. Hansson, O., et al., Evaluation of plasma Abeta(40) and Abeta(42)
as predictors of conversion to Alzheimer's disease in patients with mild
cognitive impairment. Neurobiol Aging, 2010. 31(3): p. 357-67.
3. Janelidze, S., et al., CSF biomarkers of neuroinflammation and
cerebrovascular dysfunction in early Alzheimer disease. Neurology, 2018. 91(9): p. e867-e877.
4. Menendez-Gonzalez, M., Routine lumbar puncture for the early
diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Is it safe? Front Aging Neurosci, 2014. 6: p. 65.
5. Shaw, L.M., et al., Appropriate use criteria for lumbar puncture
and cerebrospinal fluid testing in the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease.
Alzheimers Dement, 2018. 14(11): p.
1505-1521.
6. Johanson, C.E., et al., Enhanced prospects for drug delivery and
brain targeting by the choroid plexus-CSF route. Pharm Res, 2005. 22(7): p. 1011-37.
7. Hudgins, P.A., et al., Difficult Lumbar Puncture: Pitfalls and Tips
from the Trenches. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2017. 38(7): p. 1276-1283.Johanson, C.E., et al., Enhanced prospects for drug delivery and brain targeting by the choroid
plexus-CSF route. Pharm Res, 2005. 22(7):
p. 1011-37.
8. McDaniel, P.C., et al., The MR Cap: A single-sided MRI system
designed for potential point-of-care limited field-of-view brain imaging.
Magn Reson Med, 2019. 82(5): p.
1946-1960.