Tzu-Hao Harry Chao1, Li-Ming Hsu1, Martin MacKinnon1, and Yen-Yu Shih1
1University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
Synopsis
This study establishes a novel MR-compatible
multi-channel fiber-photometry
platform and demonstrates 1) photometry-CBV
measured in PrL and
Cg co-fluctuate with
global DMN signal derived from CBV-fMRI, 2) significantly enhanced 0.6-0.8 Hz GCaMP power in PrL, Cg, and RSC, but not AI, between two DMN states,
3) significantly enhanced
0.25-0.45 Hz GCaMP power in PrL, Cg and RSC precedes DMN activation peak by 3-5 s, but not AI, and 4) significantly enhanced 0.6-0.8
Hz GCaMP power in AI precedes DMN deactivation valley by 11 s.
Introduction:
Non-invasive fMRI has revolutionized our
understanding of macroscopic functional brain organization[1,2]. However, the
inherent constraints of current fMRI methodologies limit our ability to probe
the mechanisms underlying brain networks. The overarching goal of this project
is to shed light on the cellular and circuit mechanisms underlying the dynamic
functional organization of the default-mode network (DMN) – a large-scale brain
system that is crucial for a wide range of behaviors[3,4]and has similar
functional organization across humans, non-human primates and rodents[5-12]. In
both humans and animals, the DMN is anchored in the medial prefrontal
cortex/prelimbic region (PrL), cingulate cortex (Cg) and retrosplenial cortex
(RSC), and these nodes are reportedly anti-correlated with the anterior insula
(AI) during tasks[5]. Understanding DMN functional topology across species
would enable us to causally model and make predictions about brain states, and
bring insight into the network basis of behaviors and neuropsychiatric
disorders[7,13-15]. To probe the DMN, we implemented a multi-channel,
spectrally resolved fiber-photometry platform and measured neuronal activity
via a genetically encoded calcium
indicator (GCaMP) and hemodynamics via a blood-pool contrast agent (Rhodamine B), in four
distinct brain regions in real-time. We took an empirical approach and implanted
optical fibers to PrL, Cg, RSC, and AI of Thy1-GCaMP6f transgenic rats,
conducted concurrent fMRI-photometry recordings during resting-state, and
performed a series of time-frequency analyses to reveal causal relationships
between cellular output activities
in these brain areas and DMN derived from hemodynamic measurement. Methods:
Adult Thy1-GCaMP6f transgenic rats were used
in this study. Optical fibers were implanted in 3 DMN nodes – PrL (AP=3.2mm, ML=0.7mm,
DV=4.5mm), Cg (AP=1.7mm, ML=0.7mm, DV=2.0mm) and RSC (AP=-2.2mm, ML=0.4mm,
DV=0.8mm). An additional optical fiber was implanted in the AI
(AP=3.2mm, ML=4.2mm, DV=3.5mm). All recordings began one week after fiber implantation. Rhodamine B
isothiocyanate–Dextran was injected intravenously for CBV measurements
(40mg/kg). All fMRI data were collected on a Bruker 9.4T MRI using a custom RF coil. Each
rat was endotracheally intubated for ventilation, and body temperature, ETCO2,
heart rate, and oxygen saturation were continuously monitored and maintained
within normal ranges. Dexmedetomidine (0.05mg/kg/hr) and rocuronium (5mg/kg/hr)
were continuously infused and supplemented with 0.5% isoflurane to maintain
proper sedation. Results & Discussion:
FFig.1 shows the multi-channel, spectrally resolved
fiber-photometry platform, targeted network nodes, and representative GCaMP6f
and Rhodamine B spectra representing neuronal activity and hemodynamic
response, respectively. Using this platform, we performed concurrent CBV-fMRI
and photometry recordings in rats underwent established animal preparation
protocol known to exhibit DMN[16]. We extracted DMN fluctuations (black traces,
Fig.2B) via a mask derived from seed-based analysis (Fig.2A) – a
method commonly used in the literature[17]. Fig.2B also shows
representative, raw photometry-CBV data (red traces) from each fiber location
and their respective correlations with DMN fluctuations. Corresponding GCaMP
power changes computed from a wavelet-based time-frequency analysis are also
displayed. We reported significant correlations between DMN fluctuations and
photometry-CBV in PrL and Cg, but not RSC and AI. The high correlations
indicate that photometry signal
measured at select locations can be used as a surrogate measure of the DMN from fMRI. Next, we
showed the GCaMP cross-frequency correlation within and between the four
measured areas (Fig.3A). Based on this matrix we identified three
frequency bands of interest due to their prevalent positive and negative
correlations (0.25-0.45Hz, 0.6-0.8Hz, and 1.0-1.2Hz). Fig.3B summarizes
the GCaMP power spectra at PrL,
Cg, RSC, and AI at local CBV peaks and valleys. Under distinct local CBV
states, we observed significant dissociations between GCaMP power at 0.6-0.8Hz
in all DMN nodes (PrL, Cg,
and RSC). This data also indicates strong GCaMP-neurovascular coupling at
0.6-0.8Hz. We then computed DMN activation and deactivation from photometry-CBV in DMN nodes and similarly
extracted corresponding GCaMP power spectra (Fig.3C). Interestingly, we
found significantly augmented GCaMP power in PrL at a lower frequency band during DMN
activation which was not observed in Fig.3B (0.25-0.45Hz). Fig.3D
shows a GCaMP correlation matrix among the sampled areas and their power bands.
While strong positive correlations were observed among DMN nodes in all three
selected frequency bands, apparent anti-correlations were observed when
comparing 0.6-0.8Hz to 1.0-1.2Hz GCaMP power within DMN nodes. These data imply
that two distinct functional clusters might exist – one switching between two
anti-correlated firing states (i.e., 0.6-0.8Hz and 1.0-1.2Hz), and the other
operating more independently under the frequency of 0.25-0.45Hz. To better
understand the causal role of the aforementioned functional clusters to DMN, we
then performed additional analyses to extract peri-event time-frequency signal
changes. The two distinct functional clusters are also visible in the
time-frequency spectrogram centered to DMN activation (see two arrows in Fig.4A).
Our results demonstrated
that significantly enhanced 0.25-0.45Hz
GCaMP power in PrL, Cg and RSC precedes DMN activation peak by 3-5s, but not
AI, and that significantly enhanced 0.6-0.8Hz GCaMP power in Cg and AI precedes
DMN deactivation valley by 11s (Fig.4). Because GCaMP measures only
neuronal outputs, but not synaptic inputs, our data highlights the causal role
of selected cellular outputs
activities on DMN activation. Our results also confirmed the widely hypothesized role of AI in
antagonizing DMN activity[18]. Acknowledgements
We thank UNC CAMRI members for their helpful
discussions and critiques. This work is supported in part by NIH grants
RF1MH117053, R01MH111429, R01NS091236, P60AA011605, and U54HD079124.References
1. Bressler SL, and
Menon V. Large-scale brain networks in cognition: emerging methods and
principles. Trends Cogn Sci 14, 277, (2010).
2. Glasser MF et al.
The Human Connectome Project's neuroimaging approach. Nat Neurosci 19, 1175,
(2016).
3. Sridharan D,
Levitin DJ & Menon V. A critical role for the right fronto-insular cortex
in switching between central-executive and default-mode networks. PNAS 105,
12569, (2008).
4. Menon V. Large-scale brain networks and psychopathology: a unifying
triple network model. Trends Cogn Sci
15, 483, (2011).
5. Raichle ME, The brain’s default mode network. Annu Rev Neurosci 35:433,
(2015).
6. Lu H et al. Rat
brains also have a default mode network. PNAS 109, 3979, (2012).
7. Hsu LM et al., Constituents
and functional implications of the rat default mode network. PNAS 113, 4541,
(2016).
8. Mantini D et al.
Default mode of brain function in monkeys. J Neurosci 31, 12954, (2011).
9. Stafford JM et al.,
Large-scale topology and the default mode network in the mouse connectome. PNAS
111, 18745-19850, (2014).
10. Gozzi A &
Schwarz AJ. Large-scale functional connectivity networks in the rodent brain.
Neuroimage 127, 496, (2016).
11. Ma Z and Zhang N,
Temporal transitions of spontaneous brain activity. eLife 7:e33562, (2018).
12. Grandjean J et al.,
Common functional networks in the mouse brain revealed by multi-centre
resting-state fMRI analysis. Neuroimage 205:116278 (2019).
13. Seeley W et al.
Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and
executive control. J Neurosci 27, 2349, (2007).
14.
Menon V. Large-scale brain
networks and psychopathology: a unifying triple network model. Trends Cogn Sci 15, 483, (2011).
15.
Goodkind, M. et al. Identification of a common
neurobiological substrate for mental illness. JAMA psychiatry 72, 305, (2015).
16. Broadwater MA et al., Adolescent alcohol exposure decreases frontostriatal resting-state functional connectivity in adulthood. Addict Biol 23 (2), pp. 810-823 (2018).
17.
Van
Dijk, KR et al., Intrinsic functional connectivity as a tool for human
connectomics: theory, properties, and optimization. J neurophy 103,1, (2010).
18.
Zhifeng
L et al., Anticorrelated Resting-state Functional Connectivity in Awake Rat
Brain. Neuroimage 16; 59(2):
1190–1199. (2012).