Xingfeng Shao1, Kay Jann1,2, Kai Wang1, Fanhua Guo3, Peng Zhang3, and Danny JJ Wang1,2
1Mark & Mary Stevens Neuroimaging and Informatics Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States, 2Department of Neurology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States, 3State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, Beijing MRI Center for Brain Research, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Synopsis
In-vivo laminar CBF fMRI was performed
by high resolution (0.5×0.5×1.5 mm3) inner-volume GRASE with optimized pCASL labeling at 7T.
Activation of finger-tapping task (5 blocks, TA=10 min) was reliably detected in
all 4 subjects.
Both rest/FT CBF peaks in the middle layers,
which corresponds to highest capillary density in cortex layer IV.
FT evoked CBF increase shows one peak in middle
layer, and a second shoulder in deep layer. The
capability to provide quantitative CBF measurements at both baseline and task
activation with high specificity to neuronal activities is a unique strength of
ASL fMRI compared to other fMRI techniques.
Introduction
Cerebral
blood flow (CBF) fMRI measured by arterial spin labeling (ASL) is less affected
by susceptibility effect and has higher spatial specificity as compared to
BOLD. However, low SNR limits the sensitivity of CBF fMRI, and it is challenging
to detect CBF response to neuronal activation in layers. Ultra-high field ASL
has benefitted from significant higher SNR due to longer longitudinal
relaxation time of arterial blood1 and super-linearly increased SNR with
field strength.2 We demonstrated that pseudo-continuous arterial spin
labeling (pCASL) with 3D inner-volume gradient and spin echo (GRASE) readout has
the capability of revealing layer dependent CBF at 7T.3 In this study, we extended
the previous work to acquire laminar CBF fMRI in motor cortex with optimized
pCASL labeling scheme.Methods
Four healthy subjects (2M, age=26.0±4.8 yrs) underwent MRI scans
on a 7T Siemens Terra scanner with a NOVA 1Tx/32Rx head coil. GRASE readout
with inner-volume excitation was used to acquire a small imaging volume
covering left motor cortex. pCASL labeling plane was placed above the circle of
Willis (CoV) and 50 mm below imaging volume center, as shown in Figure 1.
Imaging parameters were: FOV = 100mm,
matrix size = 96 × 96, 8 slices (20% oversampling), resolution = 0.5×0.5×1.5 mm3 (in-plane
interpolation), 2 segments along phase direction, bandwidth = 1580 Hz/pixel, TE
= 33.2 ms, labeling duration = 1280 ms, PLD = 800 ms, TR = 2500 ms. CBF fMRI task
consisted of five blocks of 60 secs bilateral sequential finger-tapping (FT) interspaced
by 60 secs of rest. Total scan time = 10 mins 15 secs.
Labeling efficiency was derived
by Bloch equation simulations. Flip angle of pCASL pulses and average gradient
strength were optimized for slower flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery.
Optimal parameter was chosen for achievable highest labeling efficiency with
the constraint of SAR limit. SAR was monitored by FDA approved vendor software
and was within the first level (3.2W/kg on head).
Rigid head motion correction was
performed off-line using SPM. Rest/FT CBF maps were calculated according to ASL white paper,4 and average CBF values were measured in 3 manually segmented gray matter layers
based on co-registered T1w MP-RAGE images (0.7mm isotropic) using ITK-SNAP.5 A general linear model (GLM) was used to detect voxels of statistical
significance (FT > rest, p < 0.05, uncorrected). ROIs were defined as
significant vertices from the surface. Gray matter voxels corresponding to the
surface ROI were interpolated with nearest neighbor method into 12 equi-volume
bins. Within-layer smoothing (1mm FWHM gaussian window) was performed for
illustration purpose in Figure 5. AFNI/SUMA, FreeSurfer and custom
Python/Matlab codes were used for layer-specific data analysis.Results and discussion
Labeling efficiency = 87% with typical
pCASL parameter (FA=250, Gmean=0.6 mT/m) labeling at carotid artery
(V = 40 cm/s) (figure 2.(a)), however, labeling efficiency reduced to 71% when
labeling above the CoV (V = 15 cm/s) (figure 2.(b)). With optimized parameter (FA=150,
Gmean=1 mT/m), 85% labeling efficiency (figure 2.(c)) can be achieved with 64%
lower SAR and good off-resonance resistance (figure 2.(d)).
Figure 3 (a) shows a reference inner-volume
GRASE image. Rest/FT CBF maps were shown in figure 3 (b) and (c), respectively. Strong
CBF increase evoked by the FT task can be observed along the primary motor
cortex (M1) and in supplementary motor area (SMA), as indicated by white and
blue arrows.
Figure 4 (a) shows the
co-registered MP-RAGE image with manually segmented 3 cortical layers in M1. Figure
4 (b) shows FT evoked CBF increase in an enlarged ROI. Average CBF in
superficial, middle and deep layer are 33.3±6.4, 35.7±4.7 and 22.0±4.6
ml/100g/min at rest, and 54.9±7.4, 58.1±5.5 and 36.7±4.3 ml/100g/min with FT (figure 4
(c)). FT task evoked absolute CBF increase were 21.6, 22.4 and 14.8 ml/100g/min,
and relative CBF increase were 64.6%, 62.8% and 67.2% in superficial, middle
and deep layer, respectively.
Activation of FT was reliably
detected with GLM in all 4 subjects, as shown in figure 5 (a), which suggests that
the proposed technique provides sufficient SNR for laminar CBF fMRI studies.
Figure 5 (b) shows the layer profile averaged from 4 subjects. Both rest/FT CBF
peaks in the middle layers, which corresponds to highest capillary density in cortex
layer IV.6 FT evoked CBF increase shows one peak in middle layer, and a
second shoulder in deep layer, which follows the ‘two-peak’ activation pattern
as reported in a previous VASO fMRI study at 7T.7 This is in contrast to
depth-dependent BOLD fMRI that shows higher signal changes towards the cortical
surface due to pial veins. Conclusion
In-vivo laminar CBF fMRI was performed
by high resolution inner-volume GRASE with optimized pCASL labeling at 7T. The
capability to provide quantitative CBF measurements at both baseline and task
activation with high specificity to neuronal activities is a unique strength of
ASL fMRI compared to other fMRI techniques.Acknowledgements
This work was supported by National
Institute of Health (NIH) grant UH3-NS100614 and R01-EB028297.References
[1] Zuo Z, Wang R, Zhuo Y,
et al. Turbo-FLASH based
arterial spin labeled perfusion MRI at 7 T[J]. PloS one, 2013, 8(6): e66612.
[2]
Pohmann R, Speck O, Scheffler K. Signal‐to‐noise ratio and MR tissue parameters
in human brain imaging at 3, 7, and 9.4 tesla using current receive coil
arrays[J]. Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2016, 75(2): 801-809.
[3]
Shao X, Wang K, Wang DJJ, 7T high-resolution arterial spin labeling reveals
layer dependent cerebral blood flow. ISMRM, 2019.
[4] Alsop
D C, Detre J A, Golay X, et al. Recommended implementation of arterial
spin‐labeled perfusion MRI for clinical applications: A consensus of the ISMRM
perfusion study group and the European consortium for ASL in dementia[J].
Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2015, 73(1): 102-116.
[5]
Paul A. Yushkevich, Joseph Piven, Heather Cody Hazlett, Rachel Gimpel Smith,
Sean Ho, James C. Gee, and Guido Gerig. User-guided 3D active contour
segmentation of anatomical structures: Significantly improved efficiency and
reliability. Neuroimage 2006 Jul 1;31(3):1116-28.
[6]
Lauwers F, Cassot F, Lauwers-Cances V, et al. Morphometry of the human cerebral
cortex microcirculation: general characteristics and space-related profiles[J].
Neuroimage, 2008, 39(3): 936-948.
[7] Huber L, Handwerker D A, Jangraw D C, et al.
High-resolution CBV-fMRI allows mapping of laminar activity and connectivity of
cortical input and output in human M1[J]. Neuron, 2017, 96(6): 1253-1263. e7.