Ekaterina Zhurakovskaya1, Lauri Lehto1, Jaakko Paasonen1, Lin Wu2, Sheng Sang2, Jun Ma2, Hanne Laakso1, Tiina Pirttimäki1, Olli Gröhn1, Silvia Mangia2, and Shalom Michaeli2
1University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland, 2Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
Synopsis
Deep brain
stimulation (DBS) is widely used to treat several disorders. Given its minimal
sensitivity to electrode-induced artifacts, fMRI with Multi-Band Sweep Imaging
with Fourier Transformation (MB-SWIFT) is a powerful tool for identifying the DBS
mechanism of action at a network level. However, MB-SWIFT generally suffers
from low time resolution, thus limiting the characterization of temporal features.
Here, we introduce a novel resampling approach applicable to radial k-space
sampling such as used in MB-SWIFT, allowing to track repeating events with 200-ms
time resolution. A proof of concept was
demonstrated during DBS of the medial septal nucleus in rats.
Introduction
Widely used
to treat various neurological disorders1,2, deep brain
stimulation (DBS) is currently evolving to target new areas in the brain.
Medial septal nucleus (MSN) has projections to the hippocampus, making it an
appealing target to treat memory impairments3 and induce
neurogenesis in the hippocampal formation4,5. Functional magnetic
resonance imaging (fMRI) with Multi-Band SWeep Imaging with Fourier Transform (MB-SWIFT)
is a powerful tool to track brain response during the DBS, however, its low temporal
resolution restricts discovering temporal features of activation. In this work,
we demonstrate a novel resampling strategy that is applicable to radial k-space
sampling such as used in MB-SWIFT and that allows tracking repeating events in
the brain with high temporal resolution. Here, we aimed at mapping brain activation
in response to DBS of the MSN in rats. Materials and Methods
The study
was conducted in 7 male Sprague-Dawley rats. All animal procedures were
approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the University
of Minnesota.
The
resampling approach relies on the recognition that similar repeating events can
be tracked with higher temporal resolution than a single event by combining
data from several events. A different portion of the k-space can be selected
when acquiring a data point from each event and can then be combined with other
k-space portions to cover the entire k-space. To achieve that, each event
should be shifted so that different portions of k-space are measured each time
for every time point. To improve time resolution n times when keeping k-space coverage the same, we would need at
least n repetitions of the event (Fig.
1). After reordering the spokes, the
data is reconstructed normally, as if it was acquired from one event.
We applied this
method to DBS of the rat brain. Animals were anesthetized with isoflurane and
implanted with an electrode in the MSN. Subsequently, the anesthesia was
switched to urethane. We used MB-SWIFT imaging sequence with the following
parameters: TR 0.97 ms, bandwidth 192 kHz, matrix size 643, FOV 3.5×3.5×6.4 cm3, flip angle 5°. The
stimulation paradigm consisted of 10-s stimulations and 2-minute rest. A single
3D k-space consisted of 2000 spokes and the total time of volume acquisition
was 2 s. Therefore, to achieve 200-ms time resolution, stimulus was repeated 10
times. The stimulus shifts were applied in random order to avoid the effect of
global signal change. The resting time was randomized between 55 and 65
volumes. This measurement was repeated 3 times for each animal.
The spokes
for each time point were aggregated to achieve the whole k-space coverage. For
each animal, three 118-s – long measurements with 200-ms time resolution were composed
out of the three repeated acquisitions with 10 stimulus periods. These three measurements
were then averaged.
To exclude
habituation to the stimulus (Fig. 2), we checked the consistency of the
response and activation amplitudes for each animal. We chose several regions of
interest (ROIs) and compared time-to-peak between these ROIs. (Fig. 3). In
addition, we performed a group tensor ICA analysis to see all the different
responses in the brain (Fig. 4).Results
DBS in the
MSN caused widespread activation in several brain regions, including the hippocampus
and some cortical structures. We found that the results were consistent for
each animal, and for the three repeated scans (Fig. 2). No habituation to the
stimulus during the one-hour experiment was observed.
Time-to-peak
and amplitude of activation varied between the different brain regions (Fig. 3).
In general, activation closer to the electrode and in the areas directly
connected to the MSN lasted longer than in the areas more distant from the
stimulus site.
Group ICA
was able to detect several stimulus-related components with different time
courses (Fig. 4).Discussion
The goal of
this development was to establish a framework for high temporal resolution
method using MB-SWIFT technique for monitoring fMRI response to DBS. Increasing
temporal resolution can allow investigating the mechanisms of action of DBS in a broader temporal scale than it was possible so far using conventional fMRI.
With the
new method, we found that time-to-peak and shapes of DBS responses differ
between the brain regions. Noticeably, cortical areas showed the fastest
time-to-peak interval, while the areas directly connected to the area of
stimulation exhibited the longest time-to-peak response. It is important to
note that temporal differences can either reflect differences in brain
activation or brain region-dependent differences in hemodynamic response
function.
Notably, this
method can also be applied to naturally occurring events, not only to external
stimuli. This will require more repetitions of the event for k-space coverage
and potentially more sophisticated reconstruction for partially sampled k-space,
as natural events occur more randomly. Conclusion
A novel
resampling SWIFT-fMRI method allows tracking repeating events in the brain with
high temporal resolution. It is easily applicable and useful for DBS studies,
where the responses are stable and differ significantly between the brain
regions. However, the method has the potential to be used with recurring events
of any type. Acknowledgements
This
work was supported by the National Institutes of Health U01-NS103569-01, the
Center for Magnetic Resonance Research NIH core grant P41EB027061, the EU H2020
Marie Skłodowska RISE project #691110 (MICROBRADAM), Erkko Foundation References
1. Berlim MT, McGirr A, Van den Eynde
F, Fleck MP, Giacobbe P. Effectiveness and acceptability of deep brain
stimulation (DBS) of the subgenual cingulate cortex for treatment-resistant
depression: a systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis. Journal of affective
disorders. 2014 Apr 20;159:31-8.
2. Gross RE, Lozano AM. Advances in
neurostimulation for movement disorders. Neurological research. 2000 Apr
1;22(3):247-58.
3. Lee DJ, Gurkoff GG, Izadi A, Berman
RF, Ekstrom AD, Muizelaar JP, Lyeth BG, Shahlaie K. Medial septal nucleus theta
frequency deep brain stimulation improves spatial working memory after
traumatic brain injury. Journal of neurotrauma. 2013 Jan 15;30(2):131-9.
4. Chamaa F, Sweidan W, Nahas Z, Saade
N, Abou-Kheir W. Thalamic stimulation in awake rats induces neurogenesis in the
hippocampal formation. Brain stimulation. 2016 Jan 1;9(1):101-8.
5. Encinas JM, Hamani C, Lozano AM,
Enikolopov G. Neurogenic hippocampal targets of deep brain stimulation. Journal
of Comparative Neurology. 2011 Jan 1;519(1):6-20.