Weike Zeng1, Mengzhu Wang2, Yaxuan Pi3, Yi Li3, Xu Yan4, Guang Yang5, and Jun Shen6
1Deptpartment of Radiology, SUN YAT-SEN Memorial Hospital, SUN YAT-SEN University, Guangzhou, China, 2MR Scientific Marketing, Siemens Healthcare, Guangzhou, China, 3department of NEUROLOGY, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China, 4MR Scientific Marketing, Siemens Healthineers, Shanghai, China, 5Shanghai Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China, 6Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
Synopsis
Mean apparent propagator (MAP)-MRI, which builds a powerful analytical framework based on the random motion distribution of real water molecules, can more accurately and comprehensively characterize microstructure features of brain tissues than conventional diffusion imaging. This study investigated the application of MAP-MRI in the early diagnosis of radiation-induced brain injury in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma, compared with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI).
Introduction
Radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy is widely used in
the treatment of Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) [1]. However, it often induces aggravated
radiation-induced brain injury. Generally, early radiation brain damage is manifested
as a small edema focal of the occipital
lobe. Early diagnosis and treatment of radiation-induced brain injury is very
important, which is related to the efficacy of chemoradiotherapy in patients. Advanced
diffusion imaging can be used as an early diagnostic method of radiation-induced
brain injury. This study used diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), diffusion
kurtosis imaging (DKI) and Mean apparent
propagator (MAP)-MRI to quantitatively detect early radiation-induced brain injury
in patients with NPC. In addition, the
performance of these three diffusion methods was compared.Methods
A total of 33 patients (average age 53.02
± 11.25 years, 24 males, 9 females) previously histopathologically confirmed NPC
and 12 normal controls (NCs) (average age 53.02 ± 11.25 years, 7 males, 5
females) were recruited. All patients underwent MRI scan on a 3T MR scanner
(MAGNETOM Skyra, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). T1WI, T2WI, and dynamic
contrast-enhanced T1WI were acquired for morphological diagnosis in conventional MRI examinations. An axial
DSI sequence, a q-space Cartesian grid sampling procedure with 128 diffusion
gradient directions and sixteen b-values (b
max = 2000 s/mm
2),
were performed to obtain diffusion-weighted (DW) data. The sequence parameters
were as follows: repetition time (TR) = 4900 ms, echo time (TE) = 93 ms, field
of view (FOV) = 220 × 220 mm
2; matrix size = 110 × 110; slice
thickness = 4 mm, acquisition time = 12:17 min. All DW data were calculated by the
software called NeuDiLab, which was developed in-house based on an open-source
tool DIPY (Diffusion Imaging In Python,
http://nipy.org/dipy). And the parameters
of the three diffusion methods were obtained. The MAP-MRI parameters included return-to-origin
probability (MAP-RTOP), return to axis probability (MAP-RTAP), return to plane
probability (MAP-RTPP), mean squared displacement (MAP-MSD) and Q-space inverse
variance (MAP-QIV). The DTI parameters included axial, radial, and mean
diffusivity (DTI-AD, DTI-RD, DTI-MD) and fractional anisotropy (DTI-FA). The DKI
parameters included radial, axial, and mean kurtosis (DKI-RK, DKI-AK, DKI-MK), DKI-MD,
DKI-AD, DKI-RD, and DKI-FA. For each patient, the maximum cross-sectional area
of the enhanced edema focal on the T2WI images was manually drawn as the region
of interest (ROI) by visual inspection, and then the location of ROI was copied
to all obtained parameters to calculate the corresponding average values. Differences
in all diffusion parameters between NPC patients and NCs were compared using the
Mann-Whitney U test, and the diagnostic effectiveness was evaluated by receiver
operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
Results
As shown in Table 1, between NPC patients
and NCs, there were significant differences in MAP-MRI-based MSD, QIV, RTOP, RTAP,
RTPP, DTI-based AD, RD, MD, and DKI-based AK, MD, AD, RD (p<0.05). One
representative case is shown in Figure 1. Figure 2 and Table 2 demonstrated
that the AUCs of MAP-MSD, MAP-QIV, MAP-RTOP, MAP-RTAP, MAP-RTPP, DTI-AD, DTI-RD,
DTI-MD, DKI-AK, DKI-MD, DKI-AD, and DKI-RD were all above 0.7, and the MAP-RTPP
achieved the highest AUC (0.818) and specificity (0.917) in diagnosis of radiation
brain injury.Discussion and Conclusion
Radiation-induced brain injury is a serious
complication of head and neck tumor after radiotherapy, which is aggravated
with the treatment course. Therefore, it is essential to find a better
non-invasive method for early diagnosis. This study used three advanced
diffusion imaging (DTI, DKI and MAP-MRI) to quantitatively diagnosis the edema
focal induced by radiochemotherapy, which breaks through the limitation that
traditional MRI can only use T1 and T2 weighted images for clinical rough
morphological diagnosis of radiation brain injury[2]. Compared to DTI and DKI,
MAP-MRI is a more potential method for the early diagnosis of radiation brain
damage caused by radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Cai J, Cheng J, Li HA, et al. Nomogram for the prediction of cerebrovascular disease among patients with brain necrosis after radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Radiother Oncol. 2019 Mar;132:34-41.
2. Alexandru V. Avram , Joelle E. Sarlls , Alan S. Barnett. Clinical feasibility of using mean apparent propagator (MAP) MRI to characterize brain tissue microstructure. NeuroImage 2015