Colin M McCurdy1, Amgad M Louka1, William B Handler1, and Blaine A Chronik1
1The xMR Labs, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Western University, London, ON, Canada
Synopsis
Magneto-phosphenes are caused by induced potentials in the
retina, that result in visual stimulation, appearing as flashing lights. In the
MR environment, magneto-phosphenes have been encountered with higher gradient
strengths and longer slew times than are typically encountered in MRI. However,
in a prototype head-only gradient coil we were able to repeatably induce magneto-phosphenes
in four subjects. We then tested the effects of slew times, external light, and
eye direction on the subject’s perception of magneto-phosphenes, finding that
slew times had little effect but dimming lights and changing eye direction raised thresholds in most cases.
INTRODUCTION
Magneto-phosphenes are caused by induced potentials in the
retina, that result in visual stimulation, appearing as flashing lights. In the
MR environment, magneto-phosphenes have been encountered with higher gradient
strengths and longer slew times than are typically encountered in MRI1.
As these have no known harmful effects2 and they are rarely observed
in typical MRI operation, they have not been considered as a requirement for
testing gradient exposure. However, head-only gradient coils are capable of
greater gradient strengths than typical full body ones and magneto-phosphenes
may be possible. For a prototype head-only gradient coil in our labs, subjects have
reported flashing lights occurring at gradient output lower than the onset of
peripheral nerve stimulation for specific gradient waveforms3.
Characterizing the conditions for which these visual phenomena occur can be
explored, to make it possible to avoid the effect and enhance patient comfort. METHODS
Four subjects that had previously reported experiencing magneto-phosphenes
in a different study of PNS thresholds3 for a head-only gradient coil were recruited to
participate in a study to investigate magneto-phosphenes. Subjects were
positioned in a prototype head-only gradient coil such that they were in as far
in as possible without contacting the coil, which was known to be the position
associated with the lowest stimulation thresholds. The waveform used was
representative of a gradient diffusion waveform (Figure 1) consisting of repeated pairs of unipolar
trapezoidal pulses.
All three gradient axes (XYZ) were set to 20% of the maximum strength (129
mT/m, or a geometric sum of 223 mT/m) and
incremented at 2.5% of the maximum strength every 1.5 seconds, to be stopped
when the subject reported either peripheral nerve stimulation or
magneto-phosphenes. The polarities of each gradient axis were chosen
individually based on which combination resulted in magneto-phosphenes.
Tests were repeated three times at slew times of 0.25, 0.3, and
0.35 ms.
The test at the lowest rise time that did not cause peripheral nerve stimulation
was then repeated in dim ambient light. Then, in regular lighting, the subject
was asked to direct their eyes in 5 different directions and the test was
repeated. The directions were: towards the back end of the gradient coil,
towards the subjects’ feet, to the subjects left, to the subjects right, and
directly up (i.e. at the top of the gradient coil). Additional rise times were
tested between 0.1 and 0.7 ms to determine if there was a maximum or minimum in
our testing range that would result in magneto-phosphenes.RESULTS
All subjects reported magneto-phosphenes in a repeatable manner.
Two of the subjects experienced peripheral nerve stimulation before
magneto-phosphenes on shorter rise times; however, as the rise time was increased,
all subjects experienced magneto-phosphenes without peripheral nerve
stimulation (Figure 2). All gradient strengths are reported as a geometric sum
with equal weighting. Dimming lights resulted in the following changes in threshold for each subject: +12.99 mT/m, +9.29 mT/m, +16.70 mT/m, and -18.57 mT/m. Each difference was calculated from the mean of three repeats for each subject. Directing the eyes away from the top of the
gradient coil resulted in a higher threshold in most cases (Figure 3).DISCUSSION
Within the studied rise times (0.1 to 0.7), there appeared to
be minimal differences in the reporting of magneto-phosphenes. However, all
subjects reported a gradual increase of the visual stimulus that increased with
gradient excursion. When the eyes were relaxed and directed towards the top of
the gradient coil the threshold for magneto-phosphenes was the lowest. Moving
the eyes away from that orientation generally increased the threshold, with a
few cases where it reduced the threshold. Reducing the light in the room also seemed
to increase the threshold for three of four subjects, suggesting that the
stimulus is more difficult to perceive with dimmed lights. It is possible that
the optic nerve is
stimulated in such a manner that visual stimulus is momentarily blocked, which
would be consistent with the effect being more noticeable in brighter ambient
lighting. CONCLUSION
Although no risks are known to be associated with
magneto-phosphenes2, these experiments show that in head-only
gradient coils this effect can be experienced before the threshold of
peripheral nerve stimulation, and it may be advisable to inform subjects being
scanned on systems with head-only gradient coils that they may experience this
sensation.Acknowledgements
NSERC and the Ontario Research FundReferences
- Setsompop, K., et al. (2013). Pushing the limits of in vivo diffusion MRI for the
Human Connectome Project. NeuroImage.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.078
- IEC 60601-2-33:12, Medical electrical equipment,
Particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of
magnetic resonance equipment for medical diagnosis.
- McCurdy CM, et al. (2019)
Spoiler,
Crusher, and Diffusion Gradient Pulses Yield Higher PNS Thresholds than Long
Pulse Trains in Head-only Gradient Coils. Proceedings
of the 27th Annual
Meeting of ISMRM. Montreal, Canada, 2019
(Abstract 7121).