Hing-Chiu Chang1 and Xiaoxi Liu1,2
1Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 2Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
Synopsis
3D multi-shot diffusion-weighted imaging (msDWI) with
multi-slab acquisition can achieve high-resolution diffusion-tensor imaging (DTI),
but additional correction is required to eliminate slab boundary artifact
associated with multi-slab acquisition. A proposed 3D-MUSER technique can improve
the feasible slab thickness by enabling 3D phase correction with a 3D
single-shot navigator, thereby making single-slab 3D DTI feasible. However, the
relatively long scantime can limit the applications of 3D DTI in neuroscience
research, despite high spatial resolution attainable. In this study, we proposed
a potential strategy to develop a 3D DTI technique capable of high scan acceleration.
INTRODUCTION
Various designs of 3D multi-shot diffusion-weighted imaging (msDWI) with
multi-slab acquisition have been proposed to push the spatial resolution of diffusion-tensor
imaging (DTI)1-4. However, the slab-boundary artifacts associated
with multi-slab acquisition need to be addressed for achieving high-quality and
high-resolution 3D DTI5,6. In addition, the feasible slab thickness for 3D
msDWI is limited by the 2D phase correction assumption for correcting the
inter-shot data inconsistency. In light of this, we have proposed the 3D-MUSER
technique to improve the feasible slab thickness by enabling 3D phase
correction with a 3D single-shot navigator7. In our preliminary test, we have successfully obtain
single-slab whole brain 3D DTI (i.e., with 100 mm coverage) using 3D-MUSER technique,
without suffering from any slab boundary artifact. However, the relatively long
scantime and susceptibility to head motion can limit the applications of 3D DTI
in neuroscience research, despite high spatial resolution attainable. In this
study, we proposed a potential strategy to develop a 3D DTI technique capable
of high scan acceleration. A proof-of-concept simulation demonstrated the
feasibility of proposed acquisition and reconstruction scheme for producing
high-resolution and high-quality 3D DTI data with reduction in scantime.MATERIAL AND METHOD
Design
of Pulse Sequence
The highly accelerated single-slab 3D msDWI acquisition can be enabled
by overcoming the incompatibility between compressed sensing (CS) and 3D multi-shot
EPI acquisition. Here, we propose a pseudo-random sampling scheme that is
feasible for 3D multi-shot EPI acquisition with high acceleration factor (R). As
illustrated in Figure 1a, the acquisition of each ky segment can be collected with
different kz encodings. From this four in-plane segments example, the proposed
sampling scheme can maintain same sampling bandwidth along ky, and therefore
avoiding inconsistent off-resonance effect (Figure 1a). Figure 1b shows examples
of uniform sampling and proposed pseudo-random sampling with R=2.9. The
proposed pseudo-random sampling scheme can be achieved by modifying the pulse sequence
of 3D-MUSER technique, with additional z-gradient blips (Gzb) concurrent with
phase-encoding blips (Figure 2a). The acceleration factor and number of shots can
be determined firstly, and then a lookup table of k-space trajectory for each
shot acquisition is generated and stored (Figure 2b). During data acquisition,
the areas of Gzb can be adjusted according to the lookup table in order to
achieve pseudo-random sampling after placing all sampled data at appropriate
k-space location.
Data Reconstruction
The 3D DTI data acquired with proposed pseudo-random sampling scheme can
be reconstructed at hybrid k-space (i.e., x-ky-kz) with the signal model of 3D-MUSER as
follow:
$$$
S_{m,k_{yz|j}}(k_{y}.k_{z})=\int_{}^{}\int_{}^{}C_{m}(y,z)\phi_{k_{yz|j}}(y,z)\rho(y,z)e^{-i(yk_{y}+zk_{z})}dydz
$$$,
where $$$
S_{m,k_{yz|j}}$$$ is the segment data acquired from m-th coil and j-th
shot, $$$ C_{m}(y,z)$$$ the coil sensitivity, $$$\phi_{k_{yz|j}}$$$ the measured 3D phase variation, and $$$\rho(y,z)$$$ the image object. Because the ky and kz locations of
each segment data (i.e., from j-th shot) are known (from the lookup table), all
segment data acquired from all coils can be concatenated and composed an encoding
matrix with pseudo-random sampling as $$$\bf S=\widetilde{E}\rho$$$, where $$$\bf \widetilde{E}=F\phi C$$$ ($$$\bf F$$$ is 2D FT operator). Similar to CS reconstruction, the
artifact-free image can be solved from a minimization problem of $$$\rho\bf =\min\left\{\parallel\widetilde{E}\rho-S\parallel_{l2}+\lambda_{1}\parallel\rho\parallel_{w}\right\}$$$ using conjugate gradient method.
Hybrid Simulation
A single-slab 3D DTI dataset with 15 diffusion
directions was used for simulating the 3D msDWI acquisition with proposed
pseudo-random sampling scheme. Two pseudo-random sampling patterns with
acceleration factor of 3 and 4 were generated with a predicted hardware
constraint for Gzb (i.e., maximum feasible area of Gzb is equal to 6Δkz).
Afterward, the simulated 3D DTI data with two different pseudo-random sampling
schemes were reconstructed with proposed modelRESULTS
Figure 3 shows the hybrid simulation results of the
3D DTI data accelerated with proposed pseudo-random sampling scheme. The proposed
method reveals less reconstruction errors than the data accelerated with conventional
uniform under-sampling.DISCUSSION
Our hybrid simulation demonstrates that the reconstruction
performance of proposed pseudo-random sampling is better than conventional
uniform sampling, especially at high acceleration factor (e.g., R=4). By
analyzing the point-spread-function, pseudo-random sampling scheme transforms
the un-aliasing problem to a de-noising problem (Figure 1b). Because of that, a
recently developed DM-PCA de-noising can be used to further improve the data
quality after image reconstruction8. In practice, the pseudo-random sampling pattern
is in part limited by the feasible area of Gzb. The hardware performance needs
to be considered during the design of proper sampling pattern. If necessary,
the echo-spacing can be slightly increased to accommodate the Gzb with larger
kz steps between the acquisition of two adjacent ky lines. In conclusion, the proposed pseudo-random
sampling scheme with 3D-MUSER can enable compressed sensing for 3D DTI acquisition, thereby improve
the feasibility of 3D DTI for neuroscience research.Acknowledgements
The work was in part supported by grants from Hong
Kong Research Grant Council (GRF HKU17121517) and Hong Kong Innovation and
Technology Commission (ITS/403/18).References
1. Engstrom
M, Skare S. Diffusion-weighted 3D multislab echo planar imaging for high
signal-to-noise ratio efficiency and isotropic image resolution. Magn Reson Med
2013;70(6):1507-1514.
2. Frost R, Miller KL, Tijssen RH, Porter
DA, Jezzard P. 3D multi-slab diffusion-weighted readout-segmented EPI with
real-time cardiac-reordered K-space acquisition. Magn Reson Med
2014;72(6):1565-1579.
3. Van AT, Hernando D, Sutton BP.
Motion-induced phase error estimation and correction in 3D diffusion tensor
imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2011;30(11):1933-1940.
4. Chang HC, Sundman M, Petit L, et al.
Human brain diffusion tensor imaging at submillimeter isotropic resolution on a
3Tesla clinical MRI scanner. Neuroimage 2015;118:667-675.
5. Van AT, Aksoy M, Holdsworth SJ,
Kopeinigg D, Vos SB, Bammer R. Slab profile encoding (PEN) for minimizing slab
boundary artifact in three-dimensional diffusion-weighted multislab
acquisition. Magn Reson Med 2015;73(2):605-613.
6. Wu W, Koopmans PJ, Frost R, Miller KL.
Reducing slab boundary artifacts in three-dimensional multislab diffusion MRI
using nonlinear inversion for slab profile encoding (NPEN). Magn Reson Med
2015.
7. Chang HC, Hui ES, Chiu PW, Liu X, Chen
NK. Phase correction for three-dimensional (3D) diffusion-weighted interleaved
EPI using 3D multiplexed sensitivity encoding and reconstruction (3D-MUSER).
Magn Reson Med 2018;79(5):2702-2712.
8. Chen NK, Chang HC, Bilgin A, Bernstein
A, Trouard TP. A diffusion-matched principal component analysis (DM-PCA) based
two-channel denoising procedure for high-resolution diffusion-weighted MRI.
PLoS One 2018;13(4):e0195952.