KowsalyaDevi Pavuluri1, Shaowei Bo1, Farazad Sedaghat1, Max Kates2, and Michael T McMahon1,3
1The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States, 2Department of Urology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States, 3F.M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States
Synopsis
Urinary tract obstructions (UTOs) are impairments in
urine flow which can lead to pain, infection and irreversible kidney damage if
left undiagnosed or untreated. Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) is
a novel MRI contrast mechanism that is particularly sensitive to environmental
changes including changes in pH values. In this study we developed a protocol
by administering the FDA approved iopamidol to obtain dynamic pH and perfusion MRI
contrast maps of the kidneys and compared these with iopamidol administered
multi-phase CT in a unilateral urinary obstruction mouse model.
Target Audience:
MR
Researchers, radiologists, urologists and nephrologists interested in renal
imaging
Purpose:
Develop a novel CEST pH imaging protocol for characterizing and monitoring urinary tract obstructionsIntroduction:
Ureteral obstruction is a blockage in one or
both of the tubes (ureters) that carry urine from the kidneys to the bladder. The
causes of this obstruction may come from benign prostatic
hyperplasia (BPH), neurogenic bladder, urethral stricture disease, certain
types of bladder and ureteral cancers, or upper urinary tract pathologies such
as ureteral stricture disease, abnormalities including kidney stones, sagging
or bulging ureters or ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction.
99mTc
Mercaptoacetylinetriglycine (MAG3) w/Lasix scintigraphy and four phase CT are
commonly used methods to diagnose and characterize differential renal function
which employ ionizing radiation1-3. In this study, a CEST
MRI protocol is designed based on administration of CEST MRI pH probe,
iopamidol4,5, and acquiring pH and
perfusion maps of the kidneys for CEST MR urography6. We test these on UTO mouse model and compare with multi-phase CT
using the same imaging agent, iopamidol.Methods:
CT experiments: In vivo CT
experiments were performed on a PerkinElmer-IVIS® SpectrumCT scanner. The CT
images were acquired using the Fast mode: voxel size 300μm, FOV(cm) 12*12*13, radiation dose estimate 13.2mGv, total
time 90 seconds for each dynamic time point. Images were acquired for a total
time of 30min after administering iopamidol.
UTO mouse model: Mice were anesthetized with
~3% isoflurane. The anesthetized animal was placed in ventral recumbency with
tail towards surgeon. A
complete unilateral urinary obstruction (UUO) was performed after preparation of the surgical area through midline
incision. The kidney and bladder were identified as well as the animal’s
ureters. One ureter was suture ligated utilizing a 6-0 silk suture. The
animals were then taken to CT/MRI for the first of two time points.
In vivo experiments:
In
vivo experiments are
performed on a Bruker(Biospec 11.7T) horizontal preclinical MRI scanner using
an 8-channel mouse body phase array coil. 7-8 set of pre-injection CEST images
and high resolution 2-slice T2W images were acquired for the overlay
of CEST contrast and pH images. After this, 100µL of CEST agent (Isovue-370)
was injected into the tail vein and images of two coronal slices were acquired
for 80min by toggling the saturation offsets between 5.5 and 4.2ppm along with
5 at 40ppm (M0 images). Other CEST MRI parameters: TE/TR = 3.55ms/11s,
7 block pulses of each 300ms were used for total saturation duration of 2100ms
and 4μT power, acquisition time for each offset
image = 11sec, matrix size = 64x64.
MRI data processing: The mean pre-injection z-spectra were
subtracted from all post-injection images. 10-20 images were averaged using
moving average filter to generate the corresponding parameter maps (contrast,
pH). Pixel-by-pixel ST=(1-Mz/M0) was calculated to
generate ST maps using 4.2, 5.5ppm.
The pH was calculated using the in vitro
generated calibration curve pixel-by-pixel6.Results and Discussion
3D
CT data sets were extracted to obtain the renal CT pharmacokinetics shown in Fig.
1. On day 0 both kidneys of control mice are in the nephrographic phase at
3 minutes. For UUO mice, on both days 0 and 2 the right kidney is in the nephrographic
phase at 3 minutes, and excretion on subsequent delayed phases. On day 0,
delayed left nephrogram is observed at 11 minutes, and excretion at 17
minutes. By day 2 there is expected,
near complete, loss of left renal function, with minimal enhancement (Fig.
1B). Day 0, day 2 dynamic CEST contrast maps of 4.2 ppm overlaid on high
resolution T2W images of UTO mouse are shown in Fig. 2. The
obstructed kidney has very low contrast agent uptake on day 0 compared to the unobstructed
kidney. On day 2 the calyx of the obstructed kidney has very high contrast
agent accumulation as expected due to deteriorated kidney function. pH maps and
histograms calculated on day 0 and day 2 at 3 min after iopamidol
administration. On day 0, the unobstructed kidney has mean pH value of 6.65,
while the obstructed kidney was little acidic with mean pH of 6.44. The pH
distribution (ΔpH) of the unobstructed kidney on day 0
was 0.3 and for the obstructed kidney slightly higher pH distribution of 0.45
was observed. ΔpH was increased to 0.4 and 0.6 for
unobstructed and obstructed kidneys respectively. These results indicate that
iopamidol CEST MRI contrast and ΔpH
can be used for diagnosing and monitoring the urinary tract obstructed renal
function.Conclusion
Iopamidol CEST MR urography protocol was developed
for characterizing the urinary tract obstructions. CEST contrast and ΔpH were shown
to be promising biomarkers for diagnosing and monitoring urinary tract
obstructions.Acknowledgements
Maryland Stem Cell Research Fund # MSCRFI-2829, NIH
P41EB024495References
1. Itoh, K. Comparison of methods for determination of
glomerular filtration rate: Tc-99m-DTPA renography, predicted creatinine
clearance method and plasma sample method. Ann
Nucl Med 17, 561-565 (2003).
2. Solomon, R.J., et al. Cardiac Angiography in Renally Impaired Patients (CARE)
study: a randomized double-blind trial of contrast-induced nephropathy in
patients with chronic kidney disease. Circulation
115, 3189-3196 (2007).
3. Beckett, K.R., Moriarity, A.K. &
Langer, J.M. Safe Use of Contrast Media: What the Radiologist Needs to Know. Radiographics 35, 1738-1750 (2015).
4. Longo, D.L., Busato, A., Lanzardo,
S., Antico, F. & Aime, S. Imaging the pH evolution of an acute kidney
injury model by means of iopamidol, a MRI-CEST pH-responsive contrast agent. Magn Reson Med 70, 859-864 (2013).
5. Longo, D.L., Cutrin, J.C.,
Michelotti, F., Irrera, P. & Aime, S. Noninvasive evaluation of renal pH
homeostasis after ischemia reperfusion injury by CEST-MRI. NMR Biomed 30(2017).
6. Pavuluri, K., et al. Noninvasive monitoring of chronic kidney disease using pH
and perfusion imaging. Sci Adv 5, eaaw8357 (2019).