Yae Won Park1, Dongmin Choi2, Kyunghwa Han1, Sung Soo Ahn1, Hwiyoung Kim1, and Hyang Woon Lee3
1Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 2Department of Computer Science, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 3Department of Neurology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Synopsis
A total of 92
subjects(66 TLE [35 right and 31 left] and 26 healthy controls) were allocated
to training(n=66) and test(n=26) sets. Radiomics features (n=558) from the
bilateral hippocampi were extracted from T1WI and DTI. Machine learning models were
trained.
Identical processes were performed to differentiate right TLE from HC and left
TLE from HC.
The radiomics model in test set showed
better performance than hippocampal volume for identifying TLE (AUC 0.82 vs. AUC
0.62, P=0.08). Radiomics models of
both subgroups showed better performance than those of hippocampal volume(AUC
0.76 vs. AUC 0.54 [P=0.12] and AUC
0.95 vs 0.68 [P=0.04]).
OBJECTIVE
To investigative whether radiomics features in
bilateral hippocampi from conventional MRI and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) can
identify temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) better than hippocampal volume.MATERIALS AND METHODS
A total of 92 subjects who
had undergone MRI (66 TLE patients [35 right and 31 left TLE] and 26 healthy
controls [HC]) were allocated to training (n = 66) and test (n = 26) sets. Radiomics
features (n=558) from the bilateral hippocampi were extracted from MRI including
T1-weighted images, mean diffusivity, and fractional anisotropy maps. After
feature selection, machine learning models (random forest, extra-trees,
AdaBoost, XGBoost, and LightGBM) with subsampling methods were trained. The prediction
performance of the classifier was validated in the test set. Identical
processes were performed to differentiate right TLE from HC (training set, n=44;
test set; n=17) and left TLE from HC (training set, n=41; test set, n=16).RESULTS
The performance of the best classifier showed an
area under the curve (AUC) of 0.82 in the test set to identify TLE. The
radiomics model showed better performance than hippocampal volume for identifying
TLE (AUC 0.62, P=0.08). The performance
of the best classifiers showed an AUC of 0.76 and 0.95 in the test sets identifying
right and left TLE, respectively. Radiomics models of both subgroups showed
better performance than those of hippocampal volume (AUC 0.54 and AUC 0.68, with
P=0.12 and P=0.04, respectively). Radiomics features were significantly
correlated with neuropsychological test results.DISCUSSION
In our study, we applied
radiomics analysis to identify TLE, including not only T1 images but also DTI. The
performance of the multiparametric radiomics model outperformed the hippocampal
volume model in the test set, showing its utility.
Our
multiparametric radiomics model showed a good performance (AUC 0.82) in
differentiating the entire TLE from HC, indicating that radiomics has the
potential for creating a generalized model that is not influenced by TLE
laterality. In particular, radiomics models showed higher performance in
identifying the entire TLE as well as right and left TLE, compared with
hippocampal volume. Our results are in agreement with previous studies
reporting that microstructural changes precede macroscopic atrophy, 1 that radiomics may
reflect microstructural information different from that provided by volumetric
measures.CONCLUSION
Multiparametric radiomics classifiers may be useful
imaging biomarkers for identifying temporal lobe epilepsy patients.Acknowledgements
NoneReferences
1Weston
PS, Simpson IJ, Ryan NS, et al. Diffusion imaging changes in grey matter in
Alzheimer’s disease: a potential marker of early neurodegeneration. Alzheimers Res Ther 2015;7(1):47.