0845

Random walk simulations of diffusion in human brain white matter from 3d EM validate diffusion time-dependence transverse and parallel to axons
Hong-Hsi Lee1, Qiyuan Tian2, Chanon Ngamsombat2, Daniel R Berger3, Jeff W Lichtman3, Susie Y Huang2, Dmitry S Novikov1, and Els Fieremans1
1Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States, 2Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States, 3Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States

Synopsis

We perform for the first time Monte Carlo simulations inside realistic human intra-axonal space segmented from electron microscopy. We observe non-Gaussian time-dependent diffusion in both radial and axial directions, and validate analytical models of these phenomena. We also compare the results in human axons with similar simulations in mouse axons, and discuss how the differences in axonal parameters (mean radius, radius variation, undulations) explain the differences in the simulation results between the human and mouse.

Introduction

Diffusion MRI (dMRI) inside axons of brain white matter (WM) is non-Gaussian, as manifested by diffusivity time-dependence and a non-trivial kurtosis either transverse to or along axons, and indicates its sensitivity to axonal shape variation. Here, for the first time we perform Monte Carlo (MC) simulations within intra-axonal space (IAS) segmented from human brain subcortical WM. We validate analytical models of time-dependent diffusion, and compare results with those from mouse brain corpus callosum (CC)[1,2].

Methods

$$$\textit{Electron microscopy of human brain}$$$

Human brain sample was obtained from the posterior left middle temporal gyrus of a 47-year-old female during surgical operation for the removal of an epileptogenic focus in the left hippocampus. The tissue sample is fixed with glutaraldehyde/paraformaldehyde, stained with osmium tetroxide and embedded in Epon resin[3]. The sample containing cerebral cortex and subcortical WM was trimmed to 2mm$$$\times$$$3mm$$$\times$$$200$$$\mu$$$m and scanned with serial-section scanning EM (Sigma, Carl Zeiss)[4]. The 8$$$\times$$$8$$$\times$$$39$$$\mu$$$m$$$^3$$$ subset of subcortical WM was segmented using 2$$$d$$$/3$$$d$$$ U-Net[5], which was initially trained on the mouse EM data in CC with ground truth segmentation of myelin and IAS[1]. Voxel size was downsampled to 32$$$\times$$$32$$$\times$$$30nm$$$^3$$$.

Segmented IASs of myelinated axons longer than 20$$$\mu$$$m were aligned along the z-axis and truncated at both ends, resulting in 20 axons 18-37$$$\mu$$$m long (Fig.1a). Further, we compare IASs from human brain WM with those from mouse brain CC[1] (Fig.1b), in terms of inner diameter $$$2r$$$, caliber variation (i.e. coefficient of variation of radius, CV($$$r$$$)), and undulation variance $$$\langle{}w^2\rangle_{t\to\infty}$$$ (variance of the deviation from the axonal skeleton perpendicular to the main axis), Eq.(1b) below.

$$$\textit{Monte Carlo simulations}$$$

MC simulations were implemented in CUDA C++[2,6] for diffusion in the 3$$$d$$$ micro-geometry consisting of IAS from all 20 axons. 1$$$\times$$$10$$$^7$$$ random walkers/fiber were employed in 20 segmented IASs, diffusing 5$$$\times$$$10$$$^5$$$ steps with a duration $$$\delta{}t$$$=8$$$\times$$$10$$$^{-5}$$$ms and a length $$$\sqrt{6D_0\delta{}t}$$$=31nm for each step. The intrinsic diffusivity is set to $$$D_0$$$=2$$$\mu$$$m$$$^2$$$/ms. Maximal diffusion time was $$$t$$$=400ms. Calculations took 6 hours on 20 NVIDIA GPU cores.

Axial/radial diffusivity (AD, RD) and kurtosis (AK, RK) were computed based on the cumulants of diffusion displacements.

$$$\textit{Theory}$$$

For diffusion transverse to axons, considering the coherent averaging within a coarse-graining window along the axon, the diffusion-diffraction long-time limit of the propagator yields the RD[7]:
$$D_\perp(t)\simeq\frac{r_{\rm{}eff}^2}{4t}\,,\quad\quad(1a)$$
$$r_{\rm{}eff}^2\simeq\langle{}r^2\rangle_v+\langle w^2\rangle_{t\to\infty}\,,\quad\quad(1b)$$
where $$$r_{\rm{}eff}$$$ is the dMRI-relevant effective axon radius, $$$\langle{}r^2\rangle_v\equiv\langle{}r^4\rangle/\langle{}r^2\rangle$$$ is the volume-weighted radius estimation from histology, and $$$\langle{}w^2\rangle$$$ is the undulation variance[8,9,10].
Similarly, the RK in $$$t\to\infty$$$ limit is given by[10]
$$K^\perp_\infty\simeq\frac{\langle{}r^6\rangle\langle{}r^2\rangle}{\langle{}r^4\rangle^2}-\frac{3}{2}\,,\quad\quad(2)$$
whose minimal value $$$-1/2$$$ is reached for a perfectly straight cylinder[7].

For diffusion along axons, randomly positioned restrictions (e.g., beads) along axon lead to following AD time-dependence[11,12]:
$$D_\parallel(t)\simeq{}D^\parallel_\infty+c\cdot{}t^{-\vartheta}\,,\quad\vartheta=\frac{1}{2}\,,\quad\quad(3)$$
where the dynamical exponent $$$\vartheta=1/2$$$ is hallmark for short-range disorder in 1$$$d$$$. It was shown previously that stronger caliber variations (e.g., higher bead density/amplitude) lead to lower $$$D^\parallel_\infty$$$[13], manifested by[2]
$$\left(\frac{D_0}{D^\parallel_\infty}-1\right)\propto{\rm{}CV}^2(r)\,.\quad\quad(4)$$


Results

Structure: In human brain subcortical WM (Fig.2), we find mean inner diameter $$$2\langle{}r\rangle$$$=0.53$$$\pm$$$0.31$$$\mu$$$m, CV($$$r$$$)=0.53$$$\pm$$$0.10, and $$$\langle{}w^2\rangle_{t\to\infty}$$$=0.52$$$\pm$$$0.22$$$\mu$$$m$$$^2$$$.
For comparison, in mouse brain CC, mean inner diameter $$$2\langle{}r\rangle$$$=0.99$$$\pm$$$0.40$$$\mu$$$m, CV($$$r$$$)=0.28$$$\pm$$$0.11, and $$$\langle{}w^2\rangle_{t\to\infty}$$$=0.28$$$\pm$$$0.38$$$\mu$$$m$$$^2$$$.

Radial diffusion: Simulations in human IAS show that RD scales as $$$1/t$$$ at long time (Fig.3a), and RK approaches a negative constant at long time (Fig.3b). The dMRI-measured effective radius $$$r_{\rm{}eff}$$$ in Eq.(1a) is larger than histology-based estimation $$$\langle{}r^2\rangle_v$$$ in Eq.(1b) by a factor of 2.5 (Fig.3c).
The RK in $$$t\to\infty$$$ limit is $$$\sim-0.2$$$ (Fig.3d), very different from that in a perfect cylinder. Furthermore, we demonstrate the effect of axonal undulations on the diffusion metrics: The undulation variance $$$\langle{}w^2\rangle$$$ due to the diffusion along axonal skeleton grows with time and approaches a constant at long time, leading to a diffusivity contribution transverse to the axon $$$\simeq\langle{}w^2\rangle/(4t)\propto{}1/t$$$ (Fig.3f). Remarkably, the discrepancy in dMRI-measured effective radius $$$r_{\rm{}eff}^2$$$ and histology-based estimation $$$\langle{}r^2\rangle_v$$$ (Fig.3c) can be solely explained by the axonal undulation contribution $$$\langle{}w^2\rangle_{t\to\infty}$$$ (Fig.3g).


Axial diffusion: The simulated AD in human IAS scales as $$$1/\sqrt{t}$$$ in most of the axons (Fig.4a), with a time-dependence amplitude $$$c\approx$$$0.1-0.5$$$\mu$$$m$$$^2$$$/ms$$$^{1/2}$$$, consistent with previous in vivo observations[2]. The simulated AK decreases with time and approaches to a positive constant (Fig.4b). The relationship between long-time AD and caliber variation in Eq.(4) is tested in Fig.4c, where the high correlation indicates that long-time AD decreases due to increasing caliber variation (or increasing beading).

Comparison between human and mouse for simulated intra-axonal AD/AK/RD/RK is shown in Fig.5.

Discussion and Conclusions

Our overarching result is that the first-ever MC simulations of diffusion inside EM-segmented human axons confirm non-Gaussian time-dependent intra-axonal diffusion, and validate the proposed diffusion models in both radial and axial directions.

Comparing human and mouse, our MC results (Fig.5) exhibit similar functional forms of time-dependence both transverse and along axons. The RD time-dependence is stronger in human (Fig.5a) due to corresponding larger undulation $$$\langle{}w^2\rangle_{t\to\infty}$$$ (Fig.2c). In addition, the long-time AD is lower in human due to corresponding larger caliber variation CV($$$r$$$) (Fig.2b, Eq.(4)). The amplitude of AD time-dependence is similar between mouse and human data (Fig.5c).

Numerical simulations in 3$$$d$$$ EM-segmented micro-geometry serve as a critical validation step for biophysical model, in order to obtain quantitative biomarkers (e.g., axonal diameter, caliber variation, undulation) for potential clinical applications.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank NYULH Bigpurple for the high-performance-computing. Research was supported by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke of the NIH under award number R01 NS088040 and R21 NS081230, and NIH U01EB026996, and was performed at the Center of Advanced Imaging Innovation and Research (CAI2R, www.cai2r.net), an NIBIB Biomedical Technology Resource Center (NIH P41 EB017183).

References

[1] Lee, H. H., Yaros, K., Veraart, J., Pathan, J. L., Liang, F. X., Kim, S. G., ... & Fieremans, E. (2019). Along-axon diameter variation and axonal orientation dispersion revealed with 3D electron microscopy: implications for quantifying brain white matter microstructure with histology and diffusion MRI. Brain Structure and Function, 224(4), 1469-1488.

[2] Lee, H. H., Papaioannou, A., Kim, S. L., Novikov, D. S., & Fieremans, E. (2019). Probing axonal swelling with time dependent diffusion MRI. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.12685.

[3] Tapia, J. C. et al. High-contrast en bloc staining of neuronal tissue for field emission scanning electron microscopy. Nature protocols 7, 193-206, doi:10.1038/nprot.2011.439 (2012).

[4] Baena, V., Schalek, R. L., Lichtman, J. W. & Terasaki, M. Serial-section electron microscopy using automated tape-collecting ultramicrotome (ATUM). Methods in cell biology 152, 41-67, doi:10.1016/bs.mcb.2019.04.004 (2019).

[5] Falk, T. et al. U-Net: deep learning for cell counting, detection, and morphometry. Nat Methods 16, 67-70, doi:10.1038/s41592-018-0261-2 (2019).

[6] Fieremans, E., & Lee, H. H. (2018). Physical and numerical phantoms for the validation of brain microstructural MRI: A cookbook. Neuroimage, 182, 39-61.

[7] Burcaw, L. M., Fieremans, E., & Novikov, D. S. (2015). Mesoscopic structure of neuronal tracts from time-dependent diffusion. NeuroImage, 114, 18-37.

[8] Brabec, J., Lasic, S., & Nilsson, M. (2019). Time-dependent diffusion in undulating structures: Impact on axon diameter estimation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.04536.

[9] Nilsson, M., Lätt, J., Ståhlberg, F., van Westen, D., & Hagslätt, H. (2012). The importance of axonal undulation in diffusion MR measurements: a Monte Carlo simulation study. NMR in Biomedicine, 25(5), 795-805.

[10] Lee, H. H., Fieremans, E., Novikov, D. S. (2019) Exploring the effect of varying axonal shape on the transverse diffusion inside EM-reconstructed axons using 3d Monte Carlo simulations. Proceedings of ISMRM, 27, 0650

[11] Novikov, D. S., Jensen, J. H., Helpern, J. A., & Fieremans, E. (2014). Revealing mesoscopic structural universality with diffusion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(14), 5088-5093.

[12] Fieremans, E., Burcaw, L. M., Lee, H. H., Lemberskiy, G., Veraart, J., & Novikov, D. S. (2016). In vivo observation and biophysical interpretation of time-dependent diffusion in human white matter. NeuroImage, 129, 414-427.

[13] Budde, M. D., & Frank, J. A. (2010). Neurite beading is sufficient to decrease the apparent diffusion coefficient after ischemic stroke. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(32), 14472-14477.

Figures

Fig. 1 (a) Myelinated axons segmented from EM data in subcortical WM of the human brain. Segmented axons are 18-37 $$$\mu$$$m in length. (b) For comparison, myelinated axons segmented from EM data in genu corpus callosum of the mouse brain[1,2] are also shown. Segmented axons are 18 $$$\mu$$$m in length.

Fig. 2 Comparison of histological features from human and mouse brain WM data. (a) The inner axonal diameter is smaller in the human than that in the mouse. (b) The caliber variation, manifested by the coefficient of variation of radius, CV($$$r$$$), is larger in the human than that in the mouse. (c) The axonal undulation variance $$$\langle w^2\rangle_{t\to\infty}$$$ is larger in the human than that in the mouse.

Fig. 3 Simulated RD and RK in human axons. (a) RD scales as $$$1/t$$$ at long t. (b) RK decreases with t. (c) Effective radius $$$r_{\rm eff}$$$ in Eq.(1b) is larger than $$$\langle r^2\rangle_v\equiv\langle r^4\rangle/\langle r^2\rangle$$$. (d) long-time RK is centered at -0.2, rather than -0.5 for a perfect cylinder. (e) Undulation contribution to $$$r_{\rm eff}$$$ increases with t and approaches a plateau $$$\langle{}w^2\rangle_{t\to\infty}$$$ at long t. (f) Undulation contribution to AD scales as $$$1/t$$$. (g) The discrepancy in (c) is explained by undulations, Eq.(1b).

Fig. 4 Simulated axial diffusivity (AD) and axial kurtosis (AK) in human axons. (a) AD scales as $$$t^{-1/2}$$$ at long times. (b) AK decreases with time. (c) The relative change of AD $$$\equiv (D_0/D^\parallel_\infty)-1$$$ correlates with caliber variations, manifested by the coefficient of variation of radius, CV$$$^2$$$($$$r$$$).

Fig. 5 Comparison of simulation results of axial/radial diffusivity (AD/RD) and kurtosis (AK/RK) averaged over all IASs, segmented either from human (red) or mouse (blue) axons. (a) Overall RD $$$\overline{D}_\perp(t)$$$. (b) Overall RK $$$\overline{K}_\perp(t)$$$. (c) Overall AD $$$\overline{D}_\parallel(t)$$$. (d) Overall AK $$$\overline{K}_\parallel(t)$$$.

Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 28 (2020)
0845