Ling Li1, Yingjie Mei2, Zhaoxian Yan3, Jieping Feng3, Bo Liu3, and Xian Liu3
1Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine; The second Affiliated hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine;, Guangzhou, China, 2Clinical Science,Philips Healthcare;, Shanghai, China, 3Radiology, The second Affiliated hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
Synopsis
The
Accurate preoperative staging and grading are significant on the treatment of
protocol selection rectal adenocarcinoma. As a new molecular MR imaging technique,
APT imaging could provide information that correlates with tumor cell proliferation.
In this study, the capability of APT in differentiating WHO grades and
pathologic stages of rectal adenocarcinoma was investigated and compared with
DWI. The results show that APT value have a significantly positive correlation
with the stage and grade of the rectal adenocarcinoma, and the prognosis factor
Ki67.
Purpose and Introduction
Colorectal
cancer is the most common gastroenterologic malignancy
and rectal
adenocarcinoma is a common type of colorectal cancer1. Accurate
preoperative assessment of the prognostic factors should be valuable in
selecting patients for neoadjuvant therapy and planning surgical approaches to
optimize complete excision2. Prognosis in rectal cancer depends
strongly on tumor grade and proliferation3. Conventional MR
techniques can not detect molecular changes in rectal adenocarcinoma
efficiently. APT, using a specific endogeneous material of CEST,
semi-quantitatively measure the endogeneous moving proteins and peptide by
detecting the reduction in bulk water intensity, which indirectly reflects the
changes of the internal environment. In this study, we investigated the
capability of APT in differentiating WHO grade and pathologic T and N stages of
rectal adenocarcinoma and compared with conventional diffusion weighted imaging
(DWI), and to evaluate the correlation between APT and the proliferative factor
Ki67. Materials and Methods
Forty-three
rectal adenocacinoma patients (average age, 61
years; range, 34–85
years) were
scanned on a clinical whole-body 3.0 T MRI system
(Ingenia 3.0 T; Philips
Health care, Best, the Netherlands). A
32-channel Torso coil was used for signal reception. APT
imaging, DWI
and Conventional MR sequences
(T1-weighted,
T2-weighted ) before
gadolinium contrast-enhanced imaging (Gd-DTPA; Magnevist; Bayer HealthCare,
China) were
performed.
The
three-dimensional APT TSE-mDixon was acquired by quasi-continuous radio
frequency (RF) saturation pulse with a duration of 2 seconds. Seven
different frequency offsets (±3.5,
±3.42, ±3.58, −1540 ppm)
with respect to water frequency (0 ppm) were acquired, and
corrected by an inherent B0 field map. The
total acquisition time was 4
min
30
s.
ADC value were obtained using DWI data with b values of 0 and 1000 sec/mm2.
APT images were processed and calculated by the Philips online
workstation. Student
t test and a
one-way analysis of variance
were used for statistical analysis. The APTSImean
and mean ADC
were calculated by averaging signal intensities measured on all slices. Spearman correlation coefficient was
calculated between the APTSImean and Ki-67 labeling index
(LI) in rectal adenocarcinoma. P < 0.05 was considered to be a
statistically significant difference. According to 2007
WHO classification,
the tumor is classified as grade 1 (G1, well
differentiated) when the volume of gland-like structures occupy
greater than 95%, grade 2 (G2, moderately differentiated)
greater than 50% but less than or equal to 95%, and grade 3 (G3, poorly
differentiated) less than or equal to 50%.
Low grade included G1 and G2 tumors, G3 tumors was classified as high
grade. Ki-67
LI was defined as the percentage of positive cells among the total number of
counted cells
and measured by using the standard immunohistochemical
staining procedure in all patients.Results
The
APTSImean was increased with the advance of TN stage and WHO grade.
Concerning to the T stage of rectal adenocarcinoma, the APTSImean of
pT4 was significantly higher than those of pT3 and pT2(p<0.05). Other
pairwise comparisons did not reveal any significant differences. The APTSImean
of the tumors with metastatic lymph nodes (pN1–2) was obviously higher than the
tumors without nodal invasion (pN0) (P<.001). In addition, the APTSImean
in high-grade tumor were significantly higher than in low-grade ones
(P<.001). While significant differences of mean ADC in subgroups of TN
stages and WHO grade of rectal adenocarcinoma were not found. The TN stage and
WHO grade were significantly positive correlated with the APTSImean (T
stage: r=0.712 [95%confidence interval(CI):0.543,0.827, N stage: r=0.348, [95%CI:0.045,0.061],
WHO grade: r=0.60, [95%CI:0.371,0.785]), whereas mean ADC showed fair negative
correlations with the TN stage and WHO grade (T stage: r=-0.252 [95%CI:-0.504,
-0.012], N stage: r=0.208, [95%CI:-0.071, 0.026]). WHO grade: r=0.182,
[95%CI:-0.069, 0.393]). The median Ki-67 LI was 70% (range: 40% to 85%). The
APTSImean value was positively correlated with Ki-67 LI (r= 0.60,
[95%CI: 0.452, 0.8], p< 0.001). With a higher APTSImean
indicating greater proliferative activity (Figure2). Figure 1 demonstrate
representative images.Conclusion
In
conclusion, the APTSImean demonstrated correlations with the TN
stage and WHO grades, and performed better than the mean ADC.
In addition, APTSImean positively correlated with the Ki-67 proliferation
status in this study. 3D TSE APTw MRI would be providing a more comprehensive
preoperative assessment of rectal adenocarcinoma patients to benefit
therapeutic decision-making in the clinic.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Glynne-Jones R, Wyrwicz L, Tiret E, et al. Rectal cancer: ESMO
Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Annals
of oncology: official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology
2018; 29(Suppl 4): iv263.
2. Y M, S U, A M, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance
imaging for detecting lymph node metastasis of rectal cancer. 2011; 35(4):
895-9.
3. P K, MJ P, RA L, A S, P R, oncology LCJAjoc. Value of tumor
size as a prognostic variable in colorectal cancer: a critical reappraisal.
2011; 34(1): 43-9.