Yoshiharu Ohno1,2, Masao Yui3, Daisuke Takenaka4, Yoshimori Kassai3, Kazuhiro Murayama1, and Takeshi Yoshikawa2
1Radiology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake, Japan, 2Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan, 3Canon Medical Systems Corporation, Otawara, Japan, 4Diagnostic Radiology, Hyogo Cancer Center, Akashi, Japan
Synopsis
No one directly compare this new technique with quantitatively assessed
CT for pulmonary functional loss evaluation and The Global Initiative for
Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) classification in smokers. We hypothesized that regional ΔT1 change from
3D O2-enhanced MRI has a potential for pulmonary functional loss
assessment and clinical stage classification as well as quantitatively assessed
thin-section CT in smokers. The purpose
of this study was to prospectively and directly compare the quantitative
capability for pulmonary functional loss assessment and clinical stage classification
between 3D O2-enhanced MRI and thin-section CT in smokers.
Introduction
Thin-section CT
and nuclear medicine ventilation and/or perfusion studies have been tested for
evaluation of morphological changes or regional pulmonary functional changes in
smoking-related chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases in the last several
decades. In addition, oxygen-enhanced MR
imaging (O2-enhanced MRI) and hyperpolarized noble gas MR imaging have been examined
for assessing smoking-related chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) based on academic and clinical purposes
since 2000's. Based on past reports (1-3),
it has been reported that O2-enhanced MRI has been suggested as
having the potential for not only ventilation, but also oxygen diffusion at
alveoli, and useful for regional ventilation assessment in smoking-related COPD. However, the drawbacks of previously reported
O2-enhanced MRI was 2D acquisition using half-Fourier acquisition single-shot
turbo spin echo (HASTE) sequence at 3 different planes, time consuming,
difficulty for T1 value change assessment and higher specific absorption rate
(SAR) level at 3T MR system than that at 1.5T MR system, etc. In this situation, we developed 3D O2-enhanced
MRI for 3T system and make it possible to quantitatively evaluate regional T1
value change (ΔT1) within the entire lung.
On the other hands, no one directly compare this new technique with
quantitatively assessed CT for pulmonary functional loss evaluation and The
Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) classification in
smokers.
We hypothesized that regional ΔT1
change from 3D O2-enhanced MRI has a potential for pulmonary
functional loss assessment and clinical stage classification as well as
quantitatively assessed thin-section CT in smokers. The purpose of this study was to
prospectively and directly compare the quantitative capability for pulmonary
functional loss assessment and clinical stage classification between 3D O2-enhanced
MRI and thin-section CT in smokers.Materials and Methods
Fifty-six consecutive smokers (32 men and 24 women; age rang 40-85 years)
underwent 3D O2-enhanced MRI at a 3T system, thin-section CT and
pulmonary function test (%FEV1 and %DLCO/VA). All smokers were classified into four stages
(‘Without COPD’, ‘Mild COPD’, ‘Moderate COPD’, ‘Severe or very severe COPD’)
according to the GOLD guideline. In each
smoker, 3D O2-enhanced MRI was obtained by 3D Fast Field Echo pulse
sequence with multiple flip angle technique (TR 3.0ms/ TE 1.1ms, flip angle 2,
6, 10 and 14 degrees, SPEEDER factor= 2.0, section thickness 7.5 mm×18 slices
or 10 mm×24 slices) with breath holding at end-inspiration at each flip angle
acquisition. All O2-enhanced
MRI data were fused with pulmonary thin-section MRI with ultra-short TE and
analyzed by our proprietary software provided by Canon Medical. With non-rigged registration software,
regional ΔT1 map was generated between room air and 100%
oxygen inhalation after 3 minutes from O2-enhanced MR data by pixel by pixel
analyses. Then, ROIs were placed over
the lung on all slices, and averaged to determine mean ΔT1 in each subject. On quantitative CT in each subject,
percentage of low attenuation area within entire lung (LAA%) was also
measured.
To compare the capability for
pulmonary functional loss assessment, both indexes were correlated with each
parameter. Then, both indexes were
compared four clinical stages by Tukey’s HSD test. Finally, discrimination analyses were
performed, and accuracies of both indexes were compared each other by McNemar’s
test. Results
Representative cases are shown in
Figure 1. Correlations between each pulmonary functional parameter and both
indexes (mean ΔT1: 0.46<r2<0.71, %LAA: 0.50<r2<0.57). Result of comparison of each index among GOLD
classifications is shown in Figure 2.
ΔT1 and LAA% were significantly
correlated with %FEV1 (ΔT1: r=-0.83, p<0.0001; LAA%: r=-0.73,
p<0.0001) and %DLCO/VA (ΔT1: r=-0.73, p<0.0001;
LAA%: r=-0.69, p<0.0001).
ΔT1 had
significant difference between ‘Without COPD’ and others (p<0.05), between
‘Mild COPD’ and ‘Severe or very severe COPD’ (p<0.05), and between ‘Moderate
COPD’ and ‘Severe or very severe COPD’ (p<0.05). LAA% of ‘Without COPD’ had significant
difference with that of ‘Moderate COPD’ (p<0.05) and ‘Severe or very severe
COPD’ (p<0.05). In addition, LAA% of
‘Severe or very severe COPD’ had significant difference with that of ‘Mild
COPD’ or ‘Moderate COPD’ (p<0.05). Discrimination
accuracy of ΔT1 (66.1 [37/56] %) was significantly higher than that of LAA%
(50.0 [28/56] %, p<0.05). Conclusion
3D O2-enhanced MRI at
3T system has a better potential for pulmonary functional loss assessment and
clinical stage evaluation than quantitatively assessed CT in smokers, and may
be able to be applicable in routine clinical practice. Acknowledgements
Authors wish to thank Mr. Katsusuke Kyotani and Prof. Takamichi Murakami in Kobe University Hospital for
their valuable contributions to this study. References
-
Ohno Y, Hatabu H, Takenaka D, et al. Magn Reson Med. 2002 ;
47(6):1139-1144.
- Ohno Y, Iwasawa T, Seo JB, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care
Med. 2008; 177(10): 1095-1102.
-
Fuseya
Y, Muro S, Sato S, et al. PLoS One. 2018; 13(8): e0203273.