Nikolai Avdievich1, Georgiy Solomakha2, Loreen Ruhm1, Jonas Bause1,3, Anke Henning1,4, and Klaus Scheffler1,5
1Max Planck Institute for Bilogical Cybernetics, Tuebingen, Germany, 2Nanophotonics and Metamaterials, ITMO University, St.Petersburg, Russian Federation, 3Graduate School of Neural and Behavioral Sciences, Tuebingen, Germany, 4Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States, 5Department for Biomedical Magnetic Resonance, University of Tübingen, Tuebingen, Germany
Synopsis
We
developed a novel 9.4T (400MHz) human head transceiver array consisted of 8
optimized bent folded dipole antennas. Due to an asymmetrical shape of dipoles (bending) and the RF shield,
the array simultaneously excites two modes including a circular polarized mode
of the array itself, and the TE mode of the human head. Mode mixing can be
easily controlled by changing the folded length. As a result, the new array provides
superior whole-brain coverage compared to various 8-element loop and dipole
arrays or even to a more complicated 16-element loop array. In addition, the maximum
local SAR is substantially reduced.
Purpose:
To
improve the transmit (Tx) performance and brain coverage of a human head array coil at 9.4 T (400 MHz), a novel dipole antenna array design was
developed, constructed, and evaluated.Introduction:
Clinical
application of ultra-high field (UHF, >7 T) MRI, is still hindered due
to technical hurdles associated with imaging of large (comparable to the RF
wave length) human objects (body, head). Resulting issues include a significant
increase of the maximum local SAR, and a strong inhomogeneity of the Tx RF magnetic
field, B1+ characterized
by a pattern with strongly decreased
peripheral values (~2 times for a head (1) at UHF). Both effects are associated
with a so-called “dielectric resonance” or standing wave. Importantly, this
effect is seen along all three directions and considerably limits whole-brain
coverage at UHF. Improvement of the B1+
homogeneity and coverage can be achieved by using multi-loop Tx-arrays, e.g.
single-row 8-element (1x8) arrays (2,3), or double-row 16-element (2x8) arrays (2,4-6).
However, an adequate whole-brain
coverage was demonstrated only by using multi-row arrays (e.g.2x8)
capable of 3D RF shimming (7). In this work, we developed a novel human head 9.4 T transceiver
(TxRx) 1x8 array consisting of bent folded dipole antennas, which substantially
simplifies the Tx-coil design but provides a whole-brain coverage that is better
than that of a more complex 2x8 loop array.Methods:
Using
electromagnetic (EM) simulations we demonstrate that in the presence of the RF
shield, the bent dipole array not only produces its own circularly polarized (CP) mode but also
couples to the intrinsic transverse electric (TE) mode (“dielectric resonance”)
of the sample (Fig.1), i.e. a phantom or a human head. The TE mode resonates near 400 MHz and is characteristic of tangential electric field, Et, near the center of the sample (Fig.1). We show that the mode mixing, firstly, improves the longitudinal coverage of the Tx-array. Secondly,
it helps to reduce the maximum local SAR. This, however, can also decrease the
array Tx-performance since the TE
mode also possesses Hz component of the magnetic field. Thus, mode
mixing has to be optimized by adapting the dipole geometry. EM simulations of the local SAR and B1+
were performed using CST Studio Suite 2017 (CST, Darmstadt, Germany) and the
time-domain solver based on the
finite-integration technique. Two models were used,
i.e. an
elliptical phantom (ε=58.6, σ=0.64 S/m), and the virtual family
model “Duke”. After numerical optimization, we constructed and
tested the dipole TxRx-array consisting of eight 30-mm bent folded dipoles
(30 mm – the folded portion length). Array measured 200 mm x 230 mm in
clearance, and 175 mm in length. We compared the
performance of the new array to that of 1x8 (3) and 2x8 (6) surface loop
TxRx-arrays with the same clearance. While the 2x8 array had the same length,
the 1x8 array was shorter (100 mm). All arrays were shielded (distance to the RF
shield - 40 mm). All data were acquired on a Siemens
Magnetom 9.4 T human imaging system. Experimental B1+ maps were obtained as previously
described (8).Results and Discussion:
Fig.2 shows the effect of mode
mixing on the cylindrical phantom in the presence of an RF shield. While straight dipoles (Fig.2C) reveal only a minor quantitative
difference for shielded and unshielded arrays, bent dipoles (Fig.2D)
demonstrate a large qualitative and quantitative difference in both B1+ and SAR
distributions. Firstly, shielded bent dipoles extend the B1+
map longitudinally. Secondly, appearance of the non-zero SAR at the center of
the phantom indicates coupling to the TE mode. Fig.3 shows the effect of
bending and folding dipoles on the Duke voxel model. Clearly, mixing of modes growths
with increasing the folded portion length, which is indicated by the stronger Hz component (Fig.3B) and SAR increase near the
brain center (Fig.3C). Mode mixing also improves the brain coverage (Fig.3D).
Thus, changing the folded portion length provides an easy way of optimizing the
Tx-performance. Table 1 summarizes results of numerical optimization. The 30-mm bent folded dipoles provide the best <B1+>/√SAR
value. Finally, Fig.4 shows an experimental comparison of the new dipole array performance to
that of the 1x8, and 2x8 surface loop arrays. As seen from the figure, the
dipole array provides better coverage than both loop arrays. Conclusion:
We developed a novel
9.4T human head TxRx-array consisted of 8 optimized 30-mm bent folded dipole
antennas. Due to the asymmetrical shape of dipoles (bending), the array couples to the TE mode of the human head. Adjustment of the folded length
provides for a simple way of reducing the maximum local SAR and improving the
longitudinal coverage.Acknowledgements
SG acknowledges a support by Government of
Russian Federation (Grant 08-08) and Ministry of Education and Science of the
Russian Federation (No. 3.2465.2017/4.6). Funding by the European
Union (ERC Starting Grant, SYNAPLAST MR, Grant Number: 679927) is gratefully
acknowledged by AN and RL.References
1) Vaughan
JT,
Garwood
M, Collins
CM et al. Magn Reson
Med 2001;46:24-30. 2) Avdievich NI, Giapitzakis IA, Pfrommer A
et al. Magn Reson Med 2018;79(2):1200–1211.
3) Avdievich NI. Appl
Magn Reson 2011;41(2):483-506.
3) Adriany G, Van de
Moortele P-F, Ritter J et al. Magn Reson Med 2008;59:590-597. 4)
Gilbert KM, Belliveau J-G, Curtis AT et al. Magn Reson Med 2012;67:1487–1496. 5)
Shajan G, Kozlov M, Hoffmann J et al. Magn
Reson Med 2014;71:870–879. 6) Avdievich NI, Giapitzakis IA, Pfrommer A et al. NMR in BioMed 2018; 31(9):1-13. 7) Hoffmann J, Shajan G, Scheffler K et al. Magn Reson Mater Phy 2014;27(5):373-386. 8) Yarnykh VL. Magn Reson Med
2007;57:192-200.