Nathaniel Kim1, Arsen Mamakhanyan1, Kristin Granlund1, Elisa de Stanchina2, Manish Shah3, Lewis Cantley3,4, and Kayvan A. Keshari1,3
1Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States, 2Antitumor Assessment Core Facility, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States, 3Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States, 4Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States
Synopsis
We investigated hyperpolarized [1-13C]
dehydroascorbic acid (HP DHA) as an imaging agent for probing oxidative stress
in patient derived xenograft models (PDXs) of pancreatic cancer. By increasing
the T1 via D2O solvation and increasing the dose
administered via awake mouse injection, conversion of DHA to ascorbate was readily
observed in BRAF and KRAS mutant cancers. HP DHA was then used to characterize
oxidative stress in these PDX models and their biochemical mechanism of
response to ascorbate therapy. Changes in DHA/ascorbate metabolism were
measured in these tumor models, demonstrating a proof of concept method for
assessing ascorbate therapy in pancreatic cancer.
Introduction
Tumor progression and survival is driven by genetic
mutations and environmental conditions. Recent work has revealed that redox
metabolism is deregulated in pancreatic cancer and may provide new
opportunities for diagnosis and targeted treatment. Specifically, a therapeutic
strategy for targeting KRAS mutant
cancers using high dose ascorbate was introduced to disrupt redox homeostasis.1
Ascorbate can be oxidized in the presence of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) to
form dehydroascorbate (DHA), which is similar in molecular structure to glucose
and can therefore be efficiently taken up by glucose transporter (GLUT1). GLUT1
is overexpressed in KRAS mutant
cancer cells and other oncogene-driven tumor models. After entering the cell,
DHA is reduced back to ascorbate in a process that consumes the antioxidant glutathione,
which causes a depletion of the intracellular redox machinery and in turn
sensitizes cells to ROS. Each successive turn of this process results in a
cyclical increase in oxidative stress in the tumor microenvironment. While
targeted therapeutic strategies have been introduced, methods to monitor the
metabolic reprogramming of redox homeostasis are critically needed. We aim to
identify hyperpolarized DHA (HP DHA) as an imaging agent for quantifying
oxidative stress in pancreatic cancer. While HP DHA has been developed to
interrogate redox capacity in tumors,2 its clinical and preclinical
use has been hampered due to its short T13 and possible
toxicity at high doses. We sought to address both these limitations to
demonstrate its use in monitoring oxidative stress in patient derived xenograft
models (PDXs) of pancreatic cancer.Methods
Hyperpolarized
probe and in vivo optimization – 30
μL of 2.5 M [1-13C] DHA in dimethylacetamide were dissolved in 10 mL
of 0.3 mM EDTA in D2O. The solution of HP DHA was subjected to a 1T
magnet to measure the effect of D2O solvation on the T1
of HP DHA.4
All animal studies were
conducted under an IACUC approved animal protocol. A panel of NOD.Cg-Prkdcscid Il2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ
(NSG) mice were injected intravenously with increasing
doses of DHA to determine the feasible limit of toxicity for hyperpolarized MRS
studies. NSG mice were found to tolerate
50 mM DHA when injected awake, a dose much greater than the 7 mM DHA tolerated
when anesthetized under isoflurane.
Increased
lifetime of HP DHA in vivo – HP DHA
was injected intravenously into a subcutaneous xenograft of an HCT116 tumor
model in NSG mice. MRS of HP DHA
using a slab dynamic acquisition revealed the lifetime of the hyperpolarized
signal observed of DHA and ascorbate in the tumor as well as the relevant NMR
parameters (flip angle and repetition time for exciting the products and
temporal resolution).
Ascorbate
therapy of pancreatic cancer PDXs – BRAF-driven and KRAS-driven PDX models, created from patient samples and verified
using targeted IMPACT sequencing,5,6 were subcutaneously xenografted
in the right flank of NSG mice. 2
weeks after implantation, mice were randomly divided into two groups. One group
was treated with freshly prepared vitamin C in 400 μL of PBS (4 g/kg) twice a
day via IP injection (PC87, n= 4; PC106 n = 5). Control group mice were treated
with PBS using the same twice a day dose (PC87, n = 5; PC106 n = 5). T2
images of these mice were acquired weekly to quantify tumor size and evaluate changes
in tumor growth over time.
HP DHA
imaging of pancreatic cancer PDXs –
Ascorbate and vehicle-treated mice of both tumor models were injected with 250
μL of 20 mM HP DHA in 0.3 mM EDTA in D2O to investigate the redox
status of the implanted tumor over time. 13C HP MRS was performed
using an axial 2D CSI acquisition on a 5T small animal MRI spectrometer to
measure DHA/ascorbate metabolism. DHA/ascorbate ratios were quantified by
taking the area under the curve and compared between ascorbate-treated and
vehicle mice to determine changes in tumor redox upon ascorbate therapy.Results and Discussion
As anticipated, increasing the T1 of HP
DHA via D2O solvation (67.5 ± 4.5 s to 83.4 ± 5.7 s) and the
concentration administered via awake mouse injection (7 mM to 20 mM) allowed
for the prolonged hyperpolarized signal of DHA and its metabolic product,
ascorbate, in tumors (Figure 1).
Ascorbate treatment was shown to significantly slow tumor growth in a KRAS-driven PDX model after 4 weeks
while the effect on tumor growth was not significant in a BRAF-driven PDX model (Figure
2). Interestingly, while there was no change observed in the HP
DHA/ascorbate ratio in vivo after 1
day of treatment in the BRAF PDX (data
not shown), the HP DHA/ascorbate
ratio was found to have changed after 2 weeks of ascorbate treatment (Figure 3a and 3b). This change in redox
could be measured either by taking the total DHA and total ascorbate signal for
the whole tumor or comparing the quantified signal per voxel in the ascorbate
and vehicle-treated mice (Figure 3c).Conclusion
We demonstrated HP DHA as a biomarker for measuring changes
in redox metabolism in PDX models of pancreatic cancer. Changes in HP
DHA/ascorbate signals were observed and quantified after prolonged therapy,
which may be indicative of oxidative stress in the tumor upon ascorbate
treatment. Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge
the Stand Up to Cancer Foundation, Starr Cancer Consortium, Thompson Family
Foundation and NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant P30 CA008748 for funding and
support.References
1.
Yun, J.,
Mullarky, E., Lu, C., Bosch, K. N., Kavalier, A., Rivera, K., Roper, J., Chio,
I. I. C., Giannopoulou, E. G., Rago, C., Muley, A., Asara, J. M., Paik, J.,
Elemento, O., Chen, Z., Pappin, D. J., Dow, L. E., Papadopoulos, N., Gross, S.
S., & Cantley, L. C. (2015). Vitamin C selectively kills KRAS and BRAF
mutant colorectal cancer cells by targeting GAPDH. Science, 350(6266),
1391-1396. doi:10.1126/science.aaa5004.
2.
Keshari, K. R., Sai, V.,
Wang, Z. J., Vanbrocklin, H. F., Kurhanewicz, J., & Wilson, D. M. (2013).
Hyperpolarized [1-13C]dehydroascorbate MR spectroscopy in a murine model of
prostate cancer: comparison with 18F-FDG PET. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 54(6),
922–928. doi:10.2967/jnumed.112.115402.
3. Keshari, K. R., Kurhanewicz, J., Bok, R., Larson, P. E., Vigneron, D. B., & Wilson, D. M. (2011). Hyperpolarized 13C dehydroascorbate as an endogenous redox sensor for in vivo metabolic imaging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(46), 18606–18611. doi:10.1073/pnas.11069201084.
4. Cho, A., Eskandari, R., Miloushev, V. Z., & Keshari, K. R. (2018). A non-synthetic approach to extending the lifetime of hyperpolarized molecules using D2O solvation. Journal of Magnetic Resonance, 295, 57–62. doi:10.1016/j.jmr.2018.08.0015.
5. Cheng, D. T., Mitchell, T. N., Zehir, A., Shah, R. H., Benayed, R., Syed, A., … Berger, M. F. (2015). Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets (MSK-IMPACT): A Hybridization Capture-Based Next-Generation Sequencing Clinical Assay for Solid Tumor Molecular Oncology. The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, 17(3), 251–264. doi:10.1016/j.jmoldx.2014.12.0066.
6. Mattar, M., McCarthy, C. R., Kulick, A. R., Qeriqi, B., Guzman, S., & de Stanchina, E. (2018). Establishing and Maintaining an Extensive Library of Patient-Derived Xenograft Models. Frontiers in Oncology, 8, 19. doi:10.3389/fonc.2018.00019.