Ana-Maria Oros-Peusquens1, Ricardo Loução1, Monica Ferreira1, and N. Jon Shah1,2,3
1Research Centre Juelich, Juelich, Germany, 2Section JARA‑Brain, Jülich ‑Aachen Research Alliance (JARA), Aachen, Germany, 3Department of Neurology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
Synopsis
We present a method for
high resolution, high precision measurements of water content in vivo,
validated by comparison of the values obtained in the same brains at 3T and 7T.
Applications relevant to brain structure and function are illustrated. The
cortical distribution of water content simultaneously reflects its complement,
the macromolecular content of tissue. Furthermore, a 3D “long TR” single-scan
mapping method with 3deg excitation angle is proposed at 7T and delivers
results consistent with the 2D method. Structural scans reflecting quantitative
properties of tissue can thus be obtained in a short (7min or less) measurement
time.
Introduction
Reports exploiting the
tremendously versatile contrast of MRI in a multi-parametric fashion are
emerging. Going one step forward, we report on a multiparametric quantitative
method with potential applications to advanced in vivo neuroanatomy (e.g.
tissue segmentation / brain parcellation), numerous clinical questions (from oedema
in stroke to the research on acquaporins) and to provide insight into tissue
microstructure (myelin content, iron content/distribution). It provides
simultaneous mapping of water content, transversal relaxation rate R2*,
magnetic susceptibility c and electric conductivity s of brain
tissue. Whereas R2* contrast at high fields is well explored, quantitative water
content is seldom investigated at any field. This is surprising, giving that it
is a fundamental property of tissue as well as MRI contrast. Quantitative MRI
suffers from a pronounced sensitivity to noise, in addition to usually requiring
long acquisition times, dedicated sequences and often laborious
post-processing, We have introduced a single-scan, fast mapping method which greatly
alleviates these shortcomings even at lower fields [NIMA, Sci Rep, Frontiers]
and applied it to brain tumours at 3T [NIMA, Methods]. However, the spatial
resolution was at most 1x1x1.5mm (0.75mm slice gap), dictated by SNR and
hardware constraints. At this SNR value, the voxel-based stability of the
method is below 1% in water content. Quantitative imaging at 7T with a
highly-sensitive 32-channel coil offers the unusual situation of having SNR to
spare, which can be used to increase the resolution while maintaining the
accuracy. We report a high-resolution implementation of the single-scan mapping
method at 7T, validated by comparison to 3T quantitative results in healthy
volunteers and brain tumour patients. At
7T we also introduce a 3D variant of the single-scan water content mapping with
no T1 saturation effects in tissue. In order to illustrate the potential
of water content to investigating brain structure at high resolution, we
acquire GRE data at different slice orientations, reconstruct a water map with
a nominal (0.61mm)3 resolution.Materials and methods
Three healthy volunteers
and three brain tumour patients were scanned on a 3T (Siemens Trio) and a 7T
(Siemens Terra) scanner with protocols including a 2D multiple-echo
gradient-echo sequence (mGRE) at both fields (Table 1). Four of the 6 comparison data sets (3
patients, one volunteer) were acquired on the same day at both field strengths.
Two patients and 2 volunteers were additionally scanned with the 3D method at
7T (Table 1). Processing was performed as described in refs. 1-3, with no
additional calibration scans required. We use 3T data from five more volunteers
(same mGRE protocol), for which an MP-RAGE scan was acquired and used for FreeSurfer-based
brain parcellation. Finally, a very high resolution water map acquired at 7T
from one volunteer was obtained by combining 6 separate scans. Slice selection (1.2mm,
100% slice gap) was performed in either HF, AP or RL directions. The in-plane
resolution was (0.61mm)2. Whole brain coverage was obtained at each
orientation by combining two interleaved sets of slices. Using iPAT=2, the
acquisition time per slice set was 10min:10s. Coregistration of all data sets
and maps was performed off-line using SPM12.Results and Discussion
Fig. 1 shows the ROI-based cortical
distribution of water content obtained for 5 volunteers at 3T. The SD over 5
volunteers remains below 2% for all cortical regions, reflecting the tight
regulation of water content in vivo. Fig. 2 similarly reflects the distribution
of R2* values (similar to [5]). In Fig. 3 we compare water content and T2* between
field strengths for a representative volunteer. Fig. 4 shows water content of
the brain at an unprecedented (0.61mm)3 resolution. The blown-up
region highlights the exquisite contrast in the brain stem, reflecting among
others the presence of myelinated fibres with low water content. The water
content contrast in deep-brain structures such as substantia nigra and
subthalamic nucleus is complementary to that offered by R2* (not shown),
opening new possibilities for parcellation and investigation of effects of disease
in these small but highly relevant regions. The rich contrast in the thalamus
can be exploited for segmentation of thalamic nuclei.
Specific
regions of water content and R2* distributions can be identified in the cortex
(Figs. 1 and 2), suggesting yet unexploited potential for brain parcellation
and investigating local changes caused by neurological diseases. High SNR is seen in the water content maps obtained at 7T with the 2D
method (Fig. 3), despite an increase in the parallel imaging acceleration
factor from 2 to 3 and a decrease in the flip angle to avoid steady-state
saturation for increased T1 at 7T. At the current small sample size,
the mean water content per tissue class at 3T and 7T for the same
volunteers/patients was reproducible within 1 percent unit. The same was found
by comparing the 2D and 3D methods at 7T for the same volunteers. Further
investigation is necessary to assess the sources of this (small) variation. In
conclusion, the increased SNR and parallel imaging acceleration at 7T allow for
water content mapping with higher SNR and higher resolution (half the voxel
size) and very similar measurement time at 7T, compared to 3T. Due to same features, a single-scan 3D water
content mapping with 3deg flip angle becomes feasible at 7T.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] A.M. Oros-Peusquens et al. NIMA 2013 ; [2]
Y. Liao, A.M. Oros-Peusquens et al. Sci Reps 2019 ; [3] A.M.
Oros-Peusquens et al., Methods 2017 ; [4] A.M. Oros-Peusquens
e al., Frontiers Neurology 2019 ; [5] B. Hunt et al. PNAS 113, 2016 [6] J.
Wen et al, PNAS 115, 2018.
[7]
B. Scherrer
et al., Med Image Anal 16, 2012.