Laura Eisenmenger1, Grant Steven Roberts2, Michael Loecher3, Leonardo Rivera-Rivera1, Patrick Turski1, Kevin M Johnson1,2, and Oliver Wieben1,2
1Radiology, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, United States, 2Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, United States, 3Radiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, United States
Synopsis
Endovascular intervention via a venous approach,
or trans-venous embolization (TVE), has been increasing employed in the
management of intracranial vascular lesions such as arteriovenous malformations
(AVMs) and dural arteriovenous fistulas (DAVFs). Current pre-procedural
planning is limited by overlapping, complex vascular anatomy and a lack of
quantitative hemodynamic feature characterization. Using novel 4D flow MRI
methods, high-resolution retrograde venous flow mapping with anatomical detail
and dynamic flow fields can provide valuable information prior to TVE. We will present our institutional experience
using this method in representative intracranial vascular lesions.
Introduction
The management of intracranial vascular lesions
such as arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) and dural arteriovenous fistulas
(DAVFs) can be complex with significant morbidity and mortality. Endovascular
intervention via a venous approach, or trans-venous embolization (TVE), is a
common method to treat DAVFs. TVE for AVM treatment has recently gained interest; however, accurate
characterization of venous drainage is essential to this interventional
approach yet not readily available. 4DFlow MRI has made significant advances
over the last decade and can provide anatomical detail and dynamic flow fields
with high resolution. One compelling yet underutilized use of these unique comprehensive
datasets is the concept of ‘virtual injections’ to track the path of the blood
flow from the flow data alone without the need for an actual injection1 with
widespread potential clinical applications. In this work, we apply a novel
method2 that combines probabilistic3 displacement corrections4, and fluid constraints to track blood near AVMs
and DAVFs using only 4D flow acquisitions. Utilizing our method, these ‘virtual
injections’ can be performed both antegrade and retrograde through the
vasculature, which can greatly aid in lesion characterization prior to entering
the angiography suite. Here we will
present our institutional experience using this novel 4D Flow MRI based methodology
to perform comprehensive venous mapping of intracranial vascular malformations,
providing valuable insight into the pre-procedural vascular anatomy and the
potential impact of selective embolization.Methods
A total of 11 AVM and 2 DAVF cases were imaged
with 4D flow MRIon clinical 3T scanners (Discovery 750, GE Healthcare). 4D flow
data was acquired with a radially-undersampled PCVIPR5 acquisition with complete
volumetric brain coverage: scan time=~6min., VENC=80cm/s, isotropic spatial
resolution: 0.78 mm. Streamline steps were calculated using a 4th
order Runge-Kutta (RK4) method from
time-averaged velocity maps of the brain. Streamline starting positions (seeds)
were placed within a masked plane in the neck for whole vascular images or from
a manually positioned sphere for isolating single vessels for more detailed AVM
and DAVF vessel analysis. Every new point of a streamline was calculated with
two RK4 steps, where the first step (t = 2.4-2.7 ms) was used to approximately
compensate for velocity displacement artifacts, and the second (t=3 ms) was
then the actual streamline step to calculate the new position. Displacement
corrections were applied for each step. Stochastic noise was accounted for by
perturbing each step with a vector randomly sampled from a Gaussian
distribution (σ=1cm/s). Additional constraints were imposed to select lines
that minimize changes in kinetic energy, as well as preferring lines that stay
within the vessel boundaries as determined automatically segmented vessel walls
from the PC MR angiogram. For validation, dynamic arterial spin labeling (ASL)
images were acquired using a pseudo-continuous labeling (PCASL) sequence6 : scan time=~7min.Results
Data acquisition, reconstruction, and processing was
successfully completed in all 13 cases. Images of a right temporoparietal AVM
are demonstrated in detail in the following example figures:
Figure 1 shows a 4D flow generated angiogram and
velocity maps.
Figure 2 shows ‘virtual injection’ seeds placed in
the posterior aspect of the superior sagittal sinus with retrograde flow
tracking through the nidus of the right temporoparietal AVM into the feeding
arteries.
Figure 3 shows (A) axial, (B) coronal, and (C)
sagittal animated gifs with seeds placed in the dominate right transverse
sinus. There is retrograde flow tracking though the nidus into the feeding
arteries. The three views assist in delineating two draining veins; however,
the slower draining vein is less clearly visualized.
Figure 4 shows an animated gif demonstrating seeds
placed within each of the draining veins individually with dual-color
representation. There is faster flow through the blue draining vein with
quicker retrograde filling of the feeding artery. Slower flow is seen in the
green draining vein, which is better accentuated on the dual seeding compared
to proximal vein seeding alone (Figures 2 and 3).
Figure 5 shows multiple still images from the figure
4 gif. (A) demonstrates flow tracking with early retrograde flow into the two
draining veins. (B) and (C) demonstrate faster retrograde filling of the nidus
from the blue vein (white arrow) with early filling of the feeding arteries
(white arrowhead), indicating faster flow thought the portion of the nidus
drained by the blue vein. (D) demonstrates flow in the portion of the nidus
draining into the slower flow green vein now reaching the feeding artery
(yellow arrow). Discussion and Conclusion
This work demonstrates a novel method combining
probabilistic streamlines, displacement corrections, and fluid constraints to
track blood movement throughout the whole brain using only 4D flow acquisitions
and the concept of ‘virtual injections’. Unlike DSA and ASL, seed locations can
be (1) chosen retrospectively, (2) at multiple locations, and (3) placed in
downstream vessel segments with retrograde tracking. This analysis is
complementary to the quantitative flow analysis provided by 4D flow
acquisitions and is calculated solely with the MR data. These probabilistic
streamlines generated using corrected 4D flow MR data allow for complex venous
mapping in vascular malformations which could have high impact by assisting in
vascular lesion characterization prior to and after treatment. Future studies
are needed to assess the actual impact on improved pre-procedure planning and
patient outcomes.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] M.
Edjlali et al., “MR selective flow-tracking cartography: A
postprocessing procedure applied to four-dimensional flow MR imaging for
complete characterization of cranial dural arteriovenous fistulas,” Radiology,
vol. 270, no. 1, pp. 261–268, 2014.
[2] M. Loecher, K. Johnson, P.
Turski, and O. Wieben, “Robust Whole-Brain Blood Tracking from 4D Flow using
Displacement Corrected Probabilistic Streamlines,” in Proc Intl Soc Mag
Reson Med 22, 2014, p. 0513.
[4] O. Friman, A. Hennemuth, A.
Harloff, J. Bock, M. Markl, and H. O. Peitgen, “Probabilistic 4D blood flow
tracking and uncertainty estimation,” Med Image Anal, vol. 15, no. 5,
pp. 720–728, 2011.
[5] D. A. Steinman, C. R.
Ethier, and B. K. Rutt, “Combined analysis of spatial and velocity displacement
artifacts in phase contrast measurements of complex flows,” J Magn Reson
Imaging, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 339–346, 1997.
[6] T. Gu et al., “PC
VIPR: A high-speed 3D phase-contrast method for flow quantification and
high-resolution angiography,” AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, vol. 26, no. 4, pp.
743–749, 2005.
[7] H. Wu et al.,
“Noncontrast dynamic 3D intracranial MR angiography using pseudo-continuous
arterial spin labeling (PCASL) and accelerated 3D radial acquisition,” J
Magn Reson Imaging, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 1320–1326, 2014.