Toshiaki Taoka1,2, Rintaro Ito1,2, Rei Nakamichi2, Toshiki Nakane2, Hisashi Kawai2, and Shinji Naganawa2
1Department of Innovative Biomedical Visualization, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan, 2Department of Radiology, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan
Synopsis
To visualize the dynamics of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) motion within the
cranium, we evaluated the distribution of the motion-related signal dephasing
by CSF on a Multi b-value Diffusion-weighted image Diphase Map (MbDDM). The
MbDDM indicated that CSF motion was prominent in areas that included the
ventral portion of the posterior fossa, the suprasellar cistern and the Sylvian
fissure. Whereas, CSF motion was less in the lateral ventricles and the
parietal subarachnoid space, casting doubt on the classical model of CSF
dynamics.
Purpose
Diffusion
weighted imaging (DWI) visualizes the motion of water molecules as a signal
decrease due to the phase shift caused by the motion. When the phase shift
becomes larger than ±π or when several velocities exist in a single voxel, the
signal decrease on DWI becomes prominent according to the b-values.
Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) motion causes a prominent signal decrease (signal
drop) due to its large and/or non-uniform motion (Figure 1). We evaluated this
motion-related signal dephasing caused by CSF on a Multi b-value Diffusion
weighted image Diphase Map (MbDDM). The purpose of the current study was to
visualize and evaluate the dynamics of CSF motion in the cranium using MbDDM.Subjects and Methods
The subjects of this study consisted of 20 cases aged from 15 to 87
years old. We acquired DWI on a 1.5T clinical scanner (MAGNETOM Avanto, Siemens) with
the following parameters: TR=3500ms, TE=94ms, b-values = 0, 50, 100, 200, 300,
500, 700, 1000 s/mm2. We made color composite images in which the
area of signal drop on the various b-value images was coded with colors (MbDDM: Figure 2). We
evaluated the distribution of the CSF areas with decreased signal from motion
dephasing (0: more than half of the area had signal drop on the b=50 s/mm2
image, 1: signal drop on the b=50 s/mm2 image was present, 2: same as above on the b=100 s/mm2 image, 3: on the
b=200 s/mm2 image, 4: on the b=300 s/mm2 image, 5: on the
b=500 s/mm2 image, 6: on the b=700 s/mm2 image, 7: on the
b=1000 s/mm2 image, Figure 3). We used a Tukey test to compare the
scores of the various areas statistically.Results
Figure
3 shows the score distribution over all areas evaluated by MbDDM, and
Figure 4 shows the results of the statistical analysis
(Tukey test) for the representative areas. These results indicate that the
CSF in the ventral posterior fossa had greater movement (smaller scores)
compared to other areas. The suprasellar cistern, ambient cistern and Sylvian
vallecula also had greater CSF movement. However, the CSF within the lateral
ventricle had less motion (larger scores). Also, the subarachnoid space of the
parietal region had less motion. The scores in the third and fourth ventricles,
and the interhemispheric cistern had a high degree of variability. Discussion
In
diffusion imaging, moving water molecules have a phase shift according to the
velocity and the length of the motion-probing gradient (1-3). However, when the phase
shift becomes greater than ±π, the relationship between the phase and velocity
is lost . In addition, when various velocities exist within a single voxel, the
signal decrease becomes larger (the non-uniform flow effect). Thus, to map CSF
dynamics by diffusion imaging at various b-values, we did not calculate the CSF
velocity from the datasets of the signal intensity for different b-values,
because the relationship between the velocity and the signal intensity may not
be uniform. However, we mapped the areas with significant signal decrease due
to motion-related signal dephasing for each b-value as shown above in the
MbDDM.
The
purpose of the current study is to evaluate CSF dynamics using diffusion
imaging. According to the classical theory of CSF dynamics, which was
established in the early 20th century, CSF was thought to be produced by the
choroid plexus in the ventricle. The CSF flows outside of the ventricular
system into the subarachnoid space on the surface of the brain, and then
subsequently is absorbed by the arachnoid granules. More recently, studies have
cast doubt on this classical model of river-like CSF flow.
The
results of the current study may contribute to the growing evidence against
this classical model of CSF dynamics. The CSF motion in the trigone of the
lateral ventricle, which is thought to be the location of CSF production by the
classical model, had very little CSF motion. For the absorption, there was very
little CSF motion in the subarachnoid space in the parietal or frontal areas,
which are close to the arachnoid granules.Conclusion
The
MbDDM
indicated that CSF motion was prominent in areas that included the ventral
portion of the posterior fossa, suprasellar cistern and Sylvian fissure.
Whereas, CSF motion was less in the lateral ventricles and the parietal
subarachnoid space, casting doubt on the classical model of CSF dynamics. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D,
Grenier P, Cabanis E, Laval-Jeantet M. MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent
motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders.
Radiology 1986;161(2):401-407.
2. Le Bihan D, Breton
E, Lallemand D, Aubin ML, Vignaud J, Laval-Jeantet M. Separation of diffusion
and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology
1988;168(2):497-505.
3. Taoka T, Naganawa
S, Kawai H, Nakane T, Murata K. Can low b value diffusion weighted imaging
evaluate the character of cerebrospinal fluid dynamics? Jpn J Radiol
2019;37(2):135-144.