Here, we present an extension to our previously published T1-weighted dataset with an ultrahigh isotropic resolution of 250 µm, consisting of multiple additional contrasts. Included are up to 150 µm ToF, an updated 250 µm MPRAGE, 330 µm QSM, up to 450 µm T2-weighted SPACE, 750 µm MPM, 800 µm DTI, one hour continuous rs-fMRI as well as more than 130 MPRAGE volumes collected over 10 years (with varying spatial resolution between 450 µm and 1 mm). All data were acquired on the same 7 T scanner and of the same subject. Basic pre-processing of all data were conducted.
This work received funding from the federal state of Saxony-Anhalt under grant number ‘I 88’, from NIH under grant number ‘1R01-DA021146’, from DFG under grant number 'SP632/3', by the Initial Training Network, HiMR, funded by the FP7 Marie Curie Actions of the European Commission, grant number 'FP7-PEOPLE-2012-ITN-316716', by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research of Germany within the Forschungscampus STIMULATE, grant number '13GW0095A' and from Wellcome Trust under grant number '203147/Z/16/Z'.
1. Lüsebrink F, Sciarra A, Mattern H, Yakupov R, Speck O. T1-weighted in vivo human whole brain MRI dataset with an ultrahigh isotropic resolution of 250 μm. Sci Data. 2017;4:170032 doi: 10.1038/sdata.2017.32.
2. Lüsebrink F, Sciarra A, Mattern H, Yakupov R, Speck O. Raw data from: T1-weighted in vivo human whole brain MRI dataset with an ultrahigh isotropic resolution of 250 μm doi: 10.24352/UB.OVGU-2017-001.
3. Lüsebrink F, Sciarra A, Mattern H, Yakupov R, Speck O. Data from: T1-weighted in vivo human whole brain MRI dataset with an ultrahigh isotropic resolution of 250 μm doi: 10.5061/DRYAD.38S74.
4. Mattern H, Sciarra A, Godenschweger F, Stucht D, Lüsebrink F, Rose G, Speck O. Prospective motion correction enables highest resolution time-of-flight angiography at 7T. Magn Reson Med. 2018;80(1):248–258 doi: 10.1002/mrm.27033.
5. Mattern H, Sciarra A, Lüsebrink F, Acosta-Cabronero J, Speck O. Prospective motion correction improves high-resolution quantitative susceptibility mapping at 7T. Magn Reson Med. 2019;81(3):1605–1619 doi: 10.1002/mrm.27509.
6. Weiskopf N, Suckling J, Williams G, Correia MM, Inkster B, Tait R, Ooi C, Bullmore ET, Lutti A. Quantitative multi-parameter mapping of R1, PD(*), MT, and R2(*) at 3T: a multi-center validation. Front Neurosci. 2013;7:95 doi: 10.3389/fnins.2013.00095.
7. Maclaren J, Armstrong, Brian S R, Barrows RT et al. Measurement and correction of microscopic head motion during magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(11):e48088 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048088.
8. In M-H, Speck O. Highly accelerated PSF-mapping for EPI distortion correction with improved fidelity. MAGMA. 2012;25(3):183–192 doi: 10.1007/s10334-011-0275-6.
9. Avants BB, Tustison NJ, Johnson HJ. Advanced Normalization Tools (ANTs) [Internet]; 2015. Available from: http://stnava.github.io/ANTs/.
10. Esteban O, Birman D, Schaer M, Koyejo OO, Poldrack RA, Gorgolewski KJ. MRIQC: Advancing the automatic prediction of image quality in MRI from unseen sites. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(9):e0184661 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184661.
11. Ashburner J. SPM: a history. Neuroimage. 2012;62(2):791–800 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.025.
12. Fischl B. FreeSurfer. Neuroimage. 2012;62(2):774–781 doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.021.
13. Lüsebrink F, Mattern H, Oeltze-Jafra S, Speck O. Beyond high resolution: Denoising during image reconstruction to improve image quality. In: ESMRMB 2019, Rotterdam.