Jessie Mosso1,2, Carole Poitry-Yamate1, Dunja Simicic1,2, Mario Lepore1, Cristina Cudalbu1, and Bernard Lanz2
1Center for biomedical imaging (CIBM), EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland, 2Laboratory for functional and metabolic imaging (LIFMET), EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland
Synopsis
Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a severe
complication of chronic liver disease which drastically affects patient lives.
Its underlying mechanisms are still unknown and energy metabolism studies are
of key interest. Here, we combined 18F-FDG PET and 1H-MRS
and found a 2-fold decrease in brain glucose uptake in a rat model of HE
compared to SHAM rats, associated with a previously reported increase in brain
glutamine and decrease in osmolytes. Although the difference in glucose uptake
measured by PET results from a combination of brain and systemic effects, this
finding provides a new perspective on HE pathophysiology.
Introduction
Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a severe complication
of chronic liver disease and leads to metabolic dysfunction and cognitive
impairment, which are often lethal. The underlying mechanisms leading to this
condition are still debated but the main focus so far has been on glutamine (Gln)
metabolism. It is widely acknowledged1 that chronic
liver disease induces an excess of blood ammonia, which is not properly
excreted and causes an increase in Gln in the brain. An increased brain Gln content
is responsible for the decrease of the main osmolytes (Ins, Tau, tCho, tCr) through an osmotic regulation
mechanism which possibly results in brain oedema2. However, very
few studies on HE focused on energy metabolism so far. None of them showed significant
changes in energy metabolites, neither for glucose steady state concentrations
with 1H-MRS2 or metabolic
fluxes with 13C-MRS3, nor for γ-ATP with 31P-MRS4. Here we report
a pioneering study on energy metabolism and glucose uptake by 18F-FDG
PET in a rat model of HE, combined with 1H-MRS for disease assessment.Methods
BDL rats - The bile duct ligated (BDL) rat model for chronic liver
disease leading to HE5 was used. Surgery
was performed on adult male Wistar rats (n=12). Plasma bilirubin and ammonium were
measured longitudinally. For all experiments, rats were under isoflurane
anaesthesia (1.5-2%) and body temperature and breathing rate were monitored.
1H-MRS - 1H-MRS experiments on BDL rats were
performed on an actively shielded 9.4T scanner, using SPECIAL6 sequence (TE=2.8ms,
TR=4s, 160 averages). Acquisitions were performed at weeks 0, 4 and 6 post
surgery on two brain regions, hippocampus (week 0: n=4, week 6: n=9) and
cerebellum (week 0: n=3, week 6: n=4), with a voxel size of 2x2.8x2 mm3 and
2.5x2.5x2.5 mm3, respectively. Absolute quantification of metabolites
was performed with LCModel using the water signal as internal reference.
PET - PET experiments on BDL (n=10) and SHAM (n=8) rats were
conducted after 1H-MRS experiments at week 6, on an avalanche
photodiode detector-based LabPET 4 scanner. After injection of a bolus of 18F-FDG
in the tail vein of the rat, a 45-min dynamic acquisition was performed on the
region of the vena cava to extract the arterial input function (AIF)7. A 15-min
static acquisition was then performed on the brain and a 3D map of the glucose
cerebral metabolic rate (CMRglc) was reconstructed using the Solokoff
method8. MLEM algorithm
with the LabPET-4 built-in calibration tool was used to obtain quantified PET
images in Bq/mL (1x1x1.18 mm3 nominal resolution), corrected for
radioactivity decay. The Lumped Constant (LC) was set to 0.717 and glycaemia
values were assumed to be constant over the time of the experiment and were
measured for each rat after the static acquisition. Averages of CMRglc
maps over spectroscopic voxels were computed for comparison with 1H-MRS. Results
Plasma bilirubin (<0.5 at week 0 (n=1) to 8.1mg/dl
at week 6 (n=10)) and ammonia (26+/-7 at week 0 (n=8) to 60+/-30μM at week 6 (n=4)) increased in all BDL rats,
confirming the induced chronic liver disease.
The 1H-MRS data confirmed the previously
reported increase in brain glutamine2 in both regions
(fig 2), yet stronger in the cerebellum than in the hippocampus9 (152% versus
73%). As expected, this increase was compensated by a significant decrease in
the main osmolytes (Ins,
Tau, tCr) (-15, -19%).
The FDG input function was reliably measured from the
dynamic PET images over the vena cava (fig 3A). The Sokoloff method, using the
area under the curve of the FDG input function, LC, the steady-state brain
image and glycaemia as inputs enabled the construction of high resolution metabolic
maps (fig 3B). A typically 2-fold higher CMRglc was observed in SHAM
versus BDL rats on all coronal slices.
PET-MRI coregistration allowed a quantitative
comparison between PET and 1H-MRS data (fig 4). A significant 2-fold decrease
of CMRglc in BDL rats compared to SHAM rats was measured in both brain regions, associated
with a significant 2-fold increase in brain glutamine and 1.2-fold decrease in
brain osmolytes in BDL rats at week 6. Discussion
While 1H-MRS provided a steady state information
on metabolic pools in the hippocampus and the cerebellum, 18F-FDG
PET gave an additional and complementary information on glucose uptake. Because
18F-FDG is converted to FDG-6P and no further degraded through the
glycolysis, the PET signal at steady-state results from an accumulation of FDG-6P.
It should be noted that the difference observed in CMRglc is due to combined systemic and brain effects. Blood glycaemia values were significantly
lower in BDL rats compared to SHAM rats. Yet, the difference measured between
the two groups for CMRglc maps (120%) was lower than the difference
measured between glycaemia values (179%), suggesting an effect not restricted
to systemic differences. Future blood glucose clamp PET studies are planned to separate
the contribution of systemic and local metabolic changes on the CMRglc
of BDL rats.Conclusion
A 2-fold decrease in glucose metabolic fluxes was observed in the hippocampus and cerebellum of BDL rats versus SHAM using 18F-FDG PET. This finding correlates with an increase in glutamine and a decrease in
osmolytes in both brain regions of BDL rats and paves the way for
new insights on glucose function in the pathophysiology of HE.Acknowledgements
Supported by CIBM of the UNIL, UNIGE, HUG, CHUV, EPFL,
the Leenaards and Jeantet Foundations, the SNSF project No 310030_173222/1 and the
European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under the Marie
Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No 813120 (INSPiRE-MED). References
1. Albrecht, J. & Jones, E. A. Hepatic
encephalopathy: molecular mechanisms underlying the clinical syndrome. J.
Neurol. Sci. 170, 138–146 (1999).
2. Braissant,
O. et al. Longitudinal neurometabolic changes in the hippocampus of a
rat model of chronic hepatic encephalopathy. J. Hepatol. 71,
505–515 (2019).
3. Lanz,
B. In Vivo 13C MRS Investigation of Alterations in Cerebral Oxidative
Metabolism in a Chronic Liver Disease Rat Model. in ISMRM (2013).
4. Rackayova,
V. et al. 1H and 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopy in a rat model of
chronic hepatic encephalopathy: in vivo longitudinal measurements of brain
energy metabolism. Metab. Brain Dis. 31, 1303–1314 (2016).
5. Butterworth,
R. F. et al. Experimental models of hepatic encephalopathy: ISHEN
guidelines. Liver Int. 29, 783–788 (2009).
6. Mlynárik,
V., Gambarota, G., Frenkel, H. & Gruetter, R. Localized short-echo-time
proton MR spectroscopy with full signal-intensity acquisition. Magn. Reson.
Med. 56, 965–970 (2006).
7. Lanz,
B., Poitry-Yamate, C. & Gruetter, R. Image-derived input function from the
vena cava for 18F-FDG PET studies in rats and mice. J. Nucl. Med. Off. Publ.
Soc. Nucl. Med. 55, 1380–1388 (2014).
8. Sokoloff,
L. et al. The [14c]deoxyglucose Method for the Measurement of Local
Cerebral Glucose Utilization: Theory, Procedure, and Normal Values in the
Conscious and Anesthetized Albino Rat. J. Neurochem. 28, 897–916
(1977).
9. Simicic,
D. et al. P: 33 In Vivo Longitudinal 1H MRS Study of Hippocampal,
Cereberal and Striatal Metabolic Changes in the Adult Brain Using an Animal
Model of Chronic Hepatic Encephalopathy. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 114, S17 (2019).