Jaume Coll-Font1,2, Onur Afacan1,2, Alto Stemmer3, Richard S. Lee2,4, Jeanne Chow1,2, Simon Warfield1,2, and Sila Kurugol1,2
1Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States, 2Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States, 3Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany, 4Urology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
Synopsis
Dynamic Radial VIBE (DRV) DCE-MRI can provide high
spatio-temporal resolution in the dynamic series of volumes used to evaluate
the kidney function. However, bulk motion during the scan corrupts the volumes
and deteriorates the quality of the kidney function estimation. We introduce a
bulk-motion robust image reconstruction technique to mitigate the effects of
motion. Our algorithm detects corrupted k-space data, reconstructs the volumes
without signal dropout and aligns them. We applied this approach on non-sedated
babies undergoing feed-and-wrap DCE-MRI with DRV. Our results show that our
method improves the image quality and the estimation of the kidney function
parameters.
Introduction
Babies with antenatally detected hydronephrosis
need to be evaluated for kidney anatomy and function to determine if they would
benefit from surgical intervention to prevent permanent loss of kidney
function. Kidney function is evaluated with measures of glomerular filtration
rate (GFR) and differential renal function (DRF) per kidney. Dynamic contrast
enhanced MRI using a motion-robust radial VIBE technique and feed and wrap
imaging can provide GFR and DRF measures for babies without sedation [1], [2]. Dynamic Radial VIBE
(DRV) sequence is capable of providing the required high spatio-temporal
resolution necessary to capture fast dynamics of contrast concentration in the
aorta after bolus injection of contrast for accurate tracer kinetic model
fitting. We can then estimate the filtration rate parameter and compute the GFR
and DRF markers [3]. However, when infants
move during DCE-MRI acquisition, volumes in the dynamic series acquired during
motion events become corrupted. These volumes cannot be reacquired because of
inability to repeat contrast-injection. Motion events also severely deteriorate
the quality of the tracer-kinetic model fitting to compute clinical parameters.
We introduce a bulk-motion robust, image reconstruction technique to mitigate
the effects of motion. We first detect k-space data acquired during motion
events, which are compromised, and discard them. Then, we use temporal
regularization term in the reconstruction to fill the information for the
discarded k-space lines during image reconstruction. We also realign the misaligned volumes due to
motion events to obtain a correctly aligned dynamic series of volumes.Methods
We acquired radial VIBE DCE-MR images from 11
infants, where 4 infants had no bulk motion, 3 had moderate motion and 4 had
severe motion. Infants were imaged after being fed, swaddled and rocked to
sleep, without sedation. The images were acquired with a “stack-of-stars” 3D
FLASH prototype sequence using a multi-channel body-matrix coil (3T Siemens
Skyra/Trio, TR/TE/FA 3.56/1.39ms/12o, 32 coronal slices, voxel
size=1.25x1.25x3mm, 1326 radial spokes acquired in 6 mins with golden angle
radial ordering).
Our motion robust image reconstruction
algorithm is composed of three steps: 1) Detection of the presence of bulk
motion using the center of the k-space lines of each slice (i.e. the center point
of the k-space data in each slice, where kx,ky=0). We computed an outlier/motion
metric [4] that measures the average
cross correlation (CC) between each FID and those within a neighboring temporal
window of 3s. A drop in the value of this CC metric indicates a motion event. We
identified the stacks of k-space lines corrupted by motion as having an outlier
metric (1-CC) greater than one standard deviation above the median throughout
the entire scan and ignored them during reconstruction. 2) Motion-robust
reconstruction after removal of corrupted k-space lines: We used the remaining
k-space lines to reconstruct the sequence of volumes using iterative GRASP reconstruction
with a temporal regularization constraint [3], [5]. Each volume was
reconstructed using 34 lines per slice (~3.3 s/volume) minus those corrupted by
motion. 3) Alignment of the resulting sequence of volumes affected by motion: We
registered each volume to a reference volume selected as the one which has the smallest
outlier metric averaged across all k-space lines used for its reconstruction.
To evaluate our approach, we compare the
proposed motion-compensated image reconstruction (MoCo) with the standard image
reconstruction (GRASP) using the entire set of k-space data. We compared the average
edge strength (AES) of the sequences of volumes reconstructed with both methods.
We also fitted a tracer kinetic (TK) model to the average contrast agent
concentration over time per kidney [6]. For each subject, we repeated
the TK model over 100 wild bootstrap sampling iterations [7] and computed the
goodness of fit as the normalized root-mean-squared error (nRMSE). Results
We computed the proposed motion metric and
applied the MoCo-GRASP reconstruction on 3 subjects with moderate/intermittent
motion. The subjects with no motion are reconstructed without outlier removal
with standard GRASP and subjects with severe/continuous motion did not have sufficient
uncorrupted k-space lines for reconstruction. Figure 2 compares the volumes
reconstructed with standard GRASP and the proposed MoCo-GRASP. The GRASP
reconstructions present large motion artifacts resulting in signal dropout and
blurring of the images acquired during motion events. In contrast, MoCo-GRASP
compensates for most of the signal dropout and reduces the blurriness of the
images reconstructed. The signal dropout is also observed in the concentration
curves obtained from the standard GRASP reconstructions (Figure 3). These
signal dropout events match with increases in the outlier metric, identified as
motion events. On the other hand, the concentration curves of the MoCo-GRASP
reconstructions are smoother and do not present large signal loss. The
numerical results are summarized in Table 1. These show an average increase in AES
of 3.6 +/- 6.5 and a reduction in nRMSE of 0.014 +/- 0.02.Conclusions
We presented a motion-compensated image
reconstruction method that is robust to outliers generated due to sudden
motion. The volumes reconstructed with the novel method do not present signal
dropout and blurring during motion events. Consequently, the concentration
curves do not have large outliers and the goodness of fit of the tracer-kinetic
models improves. This method will potentially enable non-sedated DCE-MR imaging
of babies with hydronephrosis for evaluation of their kidney function.Acknowledgements
This work was supported partially by the Boston
Children's Hospital Translational Research Program Pilot Grant 2018, Society
of Pediatric Radiology Multi-center Research Grant 2019, Crohn’s and
Colitis Foundation of America’s (CCFA) Career Development
Award and AGA-Boston Scientific Technology and Innovation Award
2018 and by NIDDK of the National Institutes of Health under award number
R01DK100404.References
[1] S. Kurugol, O.
Afacan, C. Seager, R. S. Lee, J. S. Chow, and S. K. Warfield, “Compensating for
Bulk Motion in Feed and Wrap Renal Dynamic Radial VIBE DCE-MRI using Bulk
Motion Removal and Non-Rigid Registration,” Int. Soc. Magn. Reson. Med.,
no. Mc, pp. 72–74, 2018.
[2] C. Seager et al., “Feed
and Wrap Magnetic Resonance Urography Provides Anatomic and Functional Imaging
in Infants Without Anesthesia,” J. Pediatr. Urol., 2019.
[3] L. Feng et al., “Golden-angle
radial sparse parallel MRI: combination of compressed sensing, parallel
imaging, and golden-angle radial sampling for fast and flexible dynamic
volumetric MRI.,” Magn. Reson. Med., vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 707–17, Sep.
2014.
[4] J. Coll-Font et al.,
“Self- navigated bulk motion detection for feed and wrap renal dynamic radial
VIBE DCE- MRI,” in International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
(ISMRM), 2019.
[5] K. T. Block et al., “Towards
Routine Clinical Use of Radial Stack-of-Stars 3D Gradient-Echo Sequences for
Reducing Motion Sensitivity,” J. Korean Soc. Magn. Reson. Med., vol. 18,
no. 2, p. 87, 2014.
[6] S. P. Sourbron, H. J.
Michaely, M. F. Reiser, and S. O. Schoenberg, “MRI-measurement of perfusion and
glomerular filtration in the human kidney with a separable compartment model,” Invest.
Radiol., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 40–48, 2008.
[7] R. Davidson and E.
Flachaire, “The wild bootstrap, tamed at last,” J. Econom., vol. 146,
no. 1, pp. 162–169, Sep. 2008.