Prateek Kalra1, Varun Varadarajan 2, Michael S Harris3, Ashonti Harper3, Omar Mohamed3, Oliver Adunka2, Daniel M. Prevedello4, and Arunark Kolipaka1
1Radiology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States, 2Otolaryngology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States, 3Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States, 4Neurological Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, United States
Synopsis
Microsurgery
in brain tumor patients aim to complete tumor resection without compromising neurological
functionality. Inadequate preoperative knowledge of tumor may prolong surgical
time and increase risk of postoperative complications which may depends upon
tumor-brain adhesion and tumor stiffness. Previous studies have only looked
into adhesion and stiffness separately using Magnetic Resonance Elastography (MRE).
Previously, we proposed both adhesion and stiffness in vestibular schwannoma
patients. Aim of this study is to also include meningioma cases in the analysis
in order to broaden the tumor types and complexity. Preliminary results show
good correlation between MRE-derived preoperative assessment of tumor and
surgical findings.
Purpose
For decades, patients with brain tumor such as
vestibular schwannoma (VS) and meningioma have been treated with microsurgery to
resect the tumor. Surgery involves peeling tumor off the brain as well as
resecting, which depends upon tumor-brain adhesion and tumor stiffness,
respectively. Inadequate preoperative knowledge of tumor stiffness and
tumor-brain adhesion may prolong surgical time and increase risk of
postoperative complications. A study by Sakai et al. has shown stiffness
estimates using magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) in patients with brain
tumors including vestibular schwannoma have found a significant correlation
with tumor consistency during surgery [1]. Study by Yin et al. has investigated
tumor-brain adhesion in patients with vestibular schwannoma [2] and meningioma
[3]. As per our knowledge, none of the earlier studies have investigated both
the tumor stiffness and tumor-brain adhesion together in both meningioma and
schwannoma brain tumor patients. Previously, we proposed schwannoma stiffness
and tumor-adhesion using local frequency estimation (LFE) inversion technique, which
has its limitations. The aim of this study is to compute tumor stiffness using
direct inversion (DI) method and tumor-brain adhesion in patients with vestibular
schwannoma and meningioma and correlate with the clinical assessment score
reported by surgeons during surgery.Methods
All imaging was performed using a 3T MRI scanner
(Tim Trio and Prisma, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). Written informed
consent was obtained from all patients combining schwannomas and meningiomas
(n=22; age range: 26-69years). Axial slices were obtained using a spin-echo
echo planar imaging (SE-EPI) MRE sequence. T2-weighted and T1-weighted fluid-attenuated
inversion recovery (FLAIR) images were acquired to clearly identify the
tumor-brain interface. 60 Hz
vibrations were introduced through a soft pillow-like driver that is placed underneath
head in the brain coil. Imaging parameters included: FOV=256x256mm2, matrix
size=256x256, TR/TE: 1800/43.4ms, slice thickness=3 mm, ~16 slice based on
tumor coverage, MRE phase offsets=4. Motion encoding gradient of 60 Hz was
applied separately in the x, y and z directions to encode in-plane and through
plane displacement fields.
Total scan time was ~ 6 minutes. MRE images were
masked to obtain the brain and a curl processing was performed to remove
longitudinal component of motion. Additionally, directional filter was applied
to remove the reflected waves. Finally, DI method with laplacian of Gaussian was
performed to compute weighted stiffness map. ROI was drawn couple of pixels away
from the brain boundary to avoid any edge effects. On MRE data, octahedral
shear strain (OSS) [4] algorithm was applied to determine shear strain
measurements at the tumor-brain interface to quantify the degree of adhesion.
OSS map from each patient was then normalized by dividing the OSS map by its
median value since the vibrations reaching the tumor-brain interface may vary
in amplitude from patient to patient depending on anatomy, tumor location and
contact with the soft driver. Mean value from five randomly selected pixels on
tumor brain interface from brainstem (BS) and cerebellum (CER) regions is
reported for OSS. Finally, minimum value of the two regions, BS and CER, is
reported.
Blinded to the preoperative results, neurosurgeons
qualitatively assessed tumor consistency (scale 1 to 5) and adherence (scale 0
to 5) for BS and CER regions during the surgery. Only 8 patients out of 22 have
surgical scores by surgeons for adherence and 7 out of 22 had surgical consistency
results. Results
Table 1 illustrates the scoring scale used to report
surgical finding by surgeons.
Figure 1 shows T1 flair localizer, wave images in x, y and
z directions, MRE-derived stiffness map and OSS normalized map. Patient 1 and 2
have schwannoma and patient 3 and 4 have meningioma.
Figure 2 shows linear correlation plot between MRE
predictions and surgical findings for adherence in 8 and consistency in 7 brain
tumor patients. Good correlation was found in adherence with R2 = 0.87 and consistency with R2 = 0.72.
Table 2 shows classification generated based on patients data with surgical findings.Conclusion
This study
shows a good correlation between MRE predictions and surgical findings in
patients with brain tumor such as schwannoma and meningioma. Acknowledgements
Funded by NIH R01HL124096.References
1. Sakai, N., et al. "Shear stiffness of 4
common intracranial tumors measured using MR elastography: comparison with
intraoperative consistency grading." American Journal of
Neuroradiology 37.10 (2016): 1851-1859.
2. Yin, Ziying, et al. "Slip interface
imaging predicts tumor-brain adhesion in vestibular schwannomas." Radiology 277.2
(2015): 507-517.
3. Yin, Ziying, et al. "Slip interface
imaging based on MRâelastography
preoperatively predicts meningioma–brain adhesion." Journal of
Magnetic Resonance Imaging 46.4 (2017): 1007-1016.
4. McGarry, M. D. J., et al. "An octahedral
shear strain-based measure of SNR for 3D MR elastography." Physics
in Medicine & Biology 56.13 (2011): N153.