Santosh Kumar Yadav1, Sumei Wang2, Shadi Asadollahi2, MacLean Nasrallah3, Steven Brem4, Mohammad Haris1, Suyash Mohan2, and Sanjeev Chawla2
1Research, Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar, 2Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States, 3Department of Pathology and Lab Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States, 4Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
Synopsis
Accurate
identification of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant high-grade glioma is
clinically important. We investigated the combined utility of diffusion (DTI)
and perfusion (DSC-PWI) MR imaging in distinguishing IDH mutant from IDH
wild-type high-grade gliomas. Treatment naïve patients (n=30) with IDH-mutant (n=14)
and IDH-wild-type (n=16) high-grade gliomas were recruited. A classification model comprising of mean
diffusivity, coefficient of planar anisotropy and maximum relative cerebral
blood volume differentiated two
genotypes of gliomas with an accuracy of 85%, a sensitivity of 87.2%,
and a specificity of 81.5%. Combined
analysis of DTI and DSC-PWI may be helpful
in distinguishing IDH profiles of high-grade gliomas.
Introduction
Mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) gene
occurs in 70% of WHO grade II/III gliomas and 10-15% glioblastomas (GBMs).1
Accurate identification of IDH-mutation is clinically important.2
Using MR spectroscopy, some studies3,4 including from our group5 have
identified low-grade gliomas harboring IDH mutation by detecting
2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG). However, not all IDH mutant gliomas show neomorphic
activity of 2-HG production.6 Moreover, use of MR spectroscopy
requires development of sophisticated pulse sequences and post-processing
tools. Therefore, it is essential to develop alternative imaging biomarkers to
distinguish IDH-mutant from IDH-wild-type gliomas. These biomarkers may also
provide additional insights into the tumor microenvironment as targeted therapeutic agents are developed. Anecdotal studies7,8 have
employed MR diffusion and perfusion imaging techniques to differentiate these
two genotypes in low-grade gliomas. Although incidence rates of IDH mutation in
glioblastomas (GBMs) and high-grade gliomas is low, it is equally important to
develop imaging biomarkers to understand their tumor microenvironment and to
discriminate their IDH profiles. Therefore, present study was performed to
investigate the potential of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and
dynamic-susceptibility contrast-perfusion weighted imaging (DSC-PWI) in
differentiating IDH-mutant from IDH-wild-type high-grade gliomas.Material and Methods
A cohort of 30 treatment naïve patients with IDH-mutant (n=14) and
IDH-wild-type (n=16) high-grade gliomas [GBM and anaplastic astrocytoma (WHO-grade-III)] underwent anatomical
imaging, DTI and DSC-PWI on a 3T MR system with standard parameters. Motion and eddy
current corrected DTI derived maps [mead diffusivity (MD), fractional anisotropy
(FA), coefficient of linear (CL), planar (CP) and spherical anisotropy (CS)]
and DSC-perfusion imaging derived cerebral blood volume (CBV) maps and
T2-FLAIR images were co-registered to post-contrast T1-weighted images as
described previously.9,10 A semi-automatic method was used to
segment the contrast enhancing region (CER)/solid regions of each lesion. The
CBV were normalized to the contralateral normal white matter to obtain rCBV.
Median values of DTI indices [MD (mm2/s), FA, CL, CP and CS], and
rCBV were computed from CER of lesions. In addition, the 90th percentile of
rCBV values was reported as rCBVmax. Mann-Whitney U-tests were
performed to look for differences in DTI and DSC parameters between IDH mutant
and IDH wild-type high-grade gliomas. A probabilistic (P) value of less than
0.05 was considered significant. Additionally, all DTI and DSC-PWI parameters
with a high predictive power (P < 0.20, Wald test) using univariate analysis
were selected and incorporated into multivariate logistic regression analyses
to determine the best classification model. The receiver operating
characteristic (ROC) analyses were also performed.Results
Representative anatomical
images, DTI and CBV maps from IDH mutant and IDH wild-type high-grade gliomas are shown in Figures
1 and 2 respectively. Distributions of DTI indices, rCBV and rCBVmax
between two groups of patients are shown as box-whisker plots (Figure 3). From DTI, significantly
higher MD (1.5±0.3x10-3 vs. 1.1±0.1x10-3mm2/s,
p=0.02), and diminished CP (0.06±0.01 vs. 0.09±0.03, p=0.04) were observed in
IDH-mutant than in IDH-wild-type high-grade gliomas. Additionally, there were trends of
higher FA and CL in IDH-wild type gliomas. From DSC-PWI, reduced rCBV
(1.78±0.84 vs. 4.03±1.01, p=0.03) and rCBVmax (2.85±1.06 vs. 6.43±2.06, p=0.02)
were observed in IDH-mutant compared to IDH-wild-type gliomas. Using multivariate
logistic regression analyses, MD, CP and rCBVmax were the best parameters that
were selected in a backward stepwise method. This classification model
distinguished two groups of gliomas with an accuracy (AUC) of 0.85, a
sensitivity of 87.2%, and a specificity of 81.5% (Figure 4). The summary
of sensitivity and specificity for individual parameters and for the best
classification model in distinguishing IDH mutant and IDH wild-type high-grade
glioma is presented in Table 1.Discussion
In this study, we evaluated the combined utility of DTI and DSC-PWI in
distinguishing IDH mutant and IDH wild-type high-grade gliomas. Our results
revealed that a classification model comprising of DTI and DSC derived
parameters can distinguish these two genotypes of high-grade gliomas with a
high accuracy of 85%. Because of unique molecular signatures and signaling
pathways, IDH mutated gliomas are associated with relatively indolent
phenotypes with lower glucose metabolism and are known to grow at a slower rate
than IDH wild-type gliomas.11 Observation of lower rCBV from IDH
mutated high-grade gliomas compared to IDH wild-types suggest that these two
genotypes are associated with distinct angiogenesis transcriptome signatures.7
Interestingly, we observed lower CP from IDH mutant gliomas compared to IDH
wild-type counterparts. Using DTI, we have previously12 reported
that high CP may indicate hardness in meningiomas. It has also been reported
that extracellular matrix of IDH mutant GBMs is softer than that of IDH
wild-type GBMs.13 Taken together, these studies and our findings may
provide a notion that IDH mutant gliomas tend to be soft in nature. However, correlative
studies with MR Elastography, DTI and histopathology are required to ascertain
the degree of softness in gliomas. Conclusion
Our findings suggest that
a combined analysis of DTI and DSC-PWI data from enhancing regions of lesions
is promising in distinguishing IDH mutant from IDH wild-type high-grade
gliomas.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Yan
H, Parsons DW, Jin G, et
al. IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in gliomas. New Eng J Med. 2009 Feb 19;360(8):765-73.
2. Yan
W, Zhang W, You
G, et al. Correlation of IDH1 mutation
with clinicopathologic factors and prognosis in primary glioblastoma: a report
of 118 patients from China. PLoS One. 7 2012;7(1):e30339. doi:
10.1371/journal.pone.0030339.
3.
Andronesi
OC, Rapalino O, Gerstner
E, et al. Detection of oncogenic IDH1
mutations using magnetic resonance spectroscopy of 2-hydroxyglutarate. J Clin
Invest. 2013 Sep;123(9):3659-63.
4.
An Z, Tiwari V, Baxter J, et al. 3D
high-resolution imaging of 2-hydroxyglutarate in glioma patients
using DRAG-EPSI at 3T in vivo. Magn Reson Med. 2019
Feb;81(2):795-802.
5.
Verma G, Mohan S, Nasrallah MP, et al. Non-invasive
detection of 2-hydroxyglutarate in IDH-mutated gliomas using two-dimensional
localized correlation spectroscopy (2D L-COSY) at 7 Tesla. J Transl Med. 2016 Sep 22;14(1):274-82.
6.
Ichimura K, Pearson
DM, Kocialkowski S, et al. IDH1 mutations are present in the
majority of common adult gliomas but rare in primary glioblastomas. Neuro Oncol. 2009 Aug;11(4):341-7.
7.
Leu K, Ott GA, Lai
A, et al. Perfusion and diffusion MRI signatures in histologic and
genetic subtypes of WHO grade II-III diffuse gliomas. J Neurooncol. 2017 Aug;134(1):177-88.
8. Xing Z, Yang X, She D, et al. Noninvasive Assessment of IDH Mutational Status in
World Health Organization Grade II and III Astrocytomas Using DWI and DSC-PWI
Combined with Conventional MR Imaging. Am J Neuroradiol. 2017 Jun;38(6):1138-44.
9. Wang S, Kim S, Chawla S, et al. Differentiation between
glioblastomas and solitary brain metastases using diffusion tensor imaging.
NeuroImage. 2009;44:653-60.
10.
Chawla S, Wang S, Mohan S, et al. Differentiation
of brain infection from necrotic glioblastoma using combined analysis of
diffusion and perfusion MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019
Jan;49(1):184-94.
11.
Victor RR, Malta TM, Seki T, et
al. Metabolic Reprogramming Associated with Aggressiveness Occurs in
the G-CIMP-High Molecular Subtypes of IDH1mut Lower Grade Gliomas. Neuro
Oncol. 2019 Oct 30. pii: noz207. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noz207.
12. Wang S, Kim S, Zhang Y, et al. Determination of grade and subtype
of meningiomas by using histogram analysis of diffusion-tensor imaging metrics.
Radiology. 2012;
262:584-92.
13.
Miroshnikova YA, Mouw JK, Barnes JM, et al. Tissue
mechanics promote IDH1-dependent HIF1α-tenascin C feedback to regulate
glioblastoma aggression. Nat Cell
Biol. 2016; 18: 1336-45.