Kihwan Kim1, Yuning Gu1, Gahee Kim1, Mei Wong1, Bryan Clifford 2,3, Sherry Huang1, Zhi-Pei Liang2,3, and Xin Yu1,4
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States, 2Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States, 3Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States, 4Case Center for Imaging Research, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States
Synopsis
This
study examined the effects of muscle contraction, induced by electrical
stimulation, on creatine kinase (CK) reaction rate and the rate of phosphocreatine
(PCr) recovery after its transient depletion in mouse skeletal muscle using phosphorous-31
(31P) magnetic resonance fingerprinting and dynamic 31P
magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Our results showed that electrical stimulation
induced a significant increase in CK reaction rate by ~14%, as well as an
increased in PCr recovery rate by 26%, suggesting a positive preconditioning
effect induced by electrical stimulation.
Introduction:
Daily
physical activity remains an effective strategy to improve insulin sensitivity
in type 2 diabetes [1].
However, individuals respond to exercise differently and our understanding of
the determinants in response to exercise remains incomplete. It is widely
recognized that exercise training is a highly potent stimulator of
mitochondrial biogenesis leading to increased mitochondrial oxidative capacity.
Indeed, molecular analyses of skeletal muscle biopsy specimens have also
identified increased mRNA expression of mitochondrial markers and transcription
factors in response to exercise training [2].
Metabolic adaptation to chronic training have also been evaluated in vivo using 31P magnetic
resonance spectroscopy (31P-MRS) [3].
However, few studies have evaluated metabolic phenotypes in response to acute exercise.
31P
magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) offers direct, in vivo quantification of high-energy phosphate metabolites such
as adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and phosphocreatine (PCr), as well as inorganic
phosphate (Pi) [4]. Monitoring the depletion and re-synthesis of
PCr during an exercise-recovery protocol by dynamic 31P-MRS allows
for the assessment of mitochondrial oxidative capacity in skeletal muscle. Further, the activity of creatine kinase
(CK), an enzyme that catalyzes the exchange of a high-energy phosphate group
between PCr and ATP, can be quantified using various magnetization-transfer
(MT) techniques [5].
In
this study, we evaluated the acute effects of muscle contraction on CK activity
and PCr recovery kinetics in mouse hindlimb.
A 31P magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) method was
developed for fast quantification of CK reaction rate constant. Our results
show that electrical stimulation induced muscle contraction can significantly
increase CK reaction rate constant, leading to fast PCr recovery after its
depletion.Methods:
Experimental protocol: Animal studies were performed
at 9.4T using custom-built 31P saddle coil. C57BL/6 mice (n=7) were
anesthetized with isoflurane (1.5–2.5%) and placed in a cradle in lateral
position. Two needle electrodes were placed subcutaneously over the third
lumbar vertebrae and the greater trochanter, respectively. Muscle contraction
was induced by applying square-wave pulses with a 2-V amplitude and 1-ms pulse
duration at a rate of 3 Hz. For each mouse, two rounds of electrical stimulation
(4 min each) were performed with a 30-min interval between the two rounds.
CK-MRF: CK rate constant was quantified at baseline
and after the two rounds of stimulation using a 31P-MRF method described
previously [6].
20 fingerprints were acquired and averaged for each measurement, corresponding
to ~7 min acquisition time. The pseudo-first order forward CK reaction rate
constant (kf,CK) was determined by matching the averaged fingerprints
to a dictionary constructed using a MATLAB-based Bloch-McConnell simulator.
Dynamic 31P-MRS: For each round of stimulation, dynamic 31P-MRS
data were acquired to quantify the rate of PCr recovery after its depletion
induced by electrical stimulation. Acquisition used 30° excitation pulses with
a TR of 500 ms. Each acquisition lasted for 25 min, covering the baseline (5
min), stimulation (4 min), and recovery (16 min) phases. The rate constant of
PCr recovery was quantified using in-house developed, MATLAB-based software.Results:
Figure
1 shows a representative 31P-MRF fingerprint and dynamic 31P
spectra acquired from the entire mouse hindlimb. The average CK rate constant
was 0.32±0.048
s-1 before stimulation, it increased significantly by ~14% (0.36±0.046
s-1) after the first round of stimulation (p<0.05), and remained
at the same level (0.36±0.047 s-1) after the second round of stimulation
(Fig. 2A). Consistent with this increase in CK rate constant, PCr recovery
rate also increased significantly by 26%, from 0.66±0.081 min-1 after
the first round to 0.84±0.11 min-1 after second round (p<0.05, Fig. 2B).
Figure
3A shows baseline-normalized PCr levels at the end of stimulation and the steady-state
phase of recovery. Both rounds of stimulation induced ~60% depletion of PCr (42.0±11.0%
vs 41.4±4.40%).
At steady-state, PCr levels recovered to 91.5±2.51% and 94.5±1.45% of the baseline
level in round 1 and round 2, respectively. There were no statistical differences
in % PCr depletion and recovery between the two rounds. Figure 3B shows
baseline and end-stimulation tissue pH derived from the chemical shift of Pi.
Baseline pH was 7.81±0.11 and 7.72±0.17 for the two rounds respectively. Both rounds of electrical stimulation induced
significantly decreased pH. While end-stimulation pH in the second round was
slightly higher (6.83±0.14 vs 6.74±0.08), there was no statistical significance
between the two rounds. Discussion and conclusion:
In
this study we observed an increase in CK reaction rate and PCr recovery rate
after electrical stimulation. These observations suggest a positive preconditioning
effect on muscle metabolism by stimulation-induced muscle contraction.
Methodologies established in this study may provide a valuable means for investigating
the effect of both acute and chronic exercise on muscle metabolism in
laboratory animal models. Acknowledgements
This
work was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Health (R01
EB23704).References
[1] S. R. Colberg et al., “Exercise
and type 2 diabetes: The American College of Sports Medicine and the American
Diabetes Association: Joint position statement,” Diabetes Care, vol. 33,
no. 12, 2010.
[2] M. E. Osler, T. Fritz, K. Caidahl, A.
Krook, J. R. Zierath, and H. Wallberg-Henriksson, “Changes in gene expression
in responders and nonresponders to a low-intensity walking intervention,” Diabetes
Care, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 1154–1160, 2015.
[3] K. Moll, A. Gussew, M. Nisser, S.
Derlien, M. Krämer, and J. R. Reichenbach, “Comparison of metabolic adaptations
between endurance- and sprint-trained athletes after an exhaustive exercise in
two different calf muscles using a multi-slice 31 P-MR spectroscopic sequence,”
NMR Biomed., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 1–15, 2018.
[4] Y. Liu, Y. Gu, and X. Yu, “Assessing
tissue metabolism by phosphorous-31 magnetic resonance spectroscopy and
imaging: a methodology review,” Quant. Imaging Med. Surg., vol. 7, no.
6, pp. 707–716, Dec. 2017.
[5] C. Y. I. Wang and C. Y. Wang, “High
Energy Phosphate Metabolism Measurement By Phosphorus-31 Magnetic Resonance,”
2018.
[6] C. Y. Wang, Y. Liu, S. Huang, M. A.
Griswold, N. Seiberlich, and X. Yu, “31P magnetic resonance fingerprinting for
rapid quantification of creatine kinase reaction rate in vivo,” NMR Biomed.,
vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 1–14, 2017.