Evita Wiegers1, Kim Annink2, Niek van der Aa2, Jeroen Dudink2, Thomas Alderliesten2, Floris Groenendaal2, Maarten Lequin1, Floor Jansen3, Koenraad Rhebergen4, Peter Luijten1, Jeroen Hendrikse1, Hans Hoogduin1, Erik Huijing1, Edwin Versteeg1, Fredy Visser1, Alexander Raaijmakers1, Dennis Klomp1, Manon Benders2, and Jannie Wijnen1
1Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands, 2Department of Neonatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands, 3Department of Paediatric neurology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands, 4Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
Synopsis
The aim of this study was
to investigate the safety and feasibility of 7T MRI in neonates. RF safety
simulations showed that the global and peak specific absorption rates in a baby
model do not exceed the specific absorption rates in adult models at 7T.
Furthermore an (acoustic) noise damping hood was developed to guarantee hearing protection. In 10 neonates, we show that it is feasible to obtain good quality
images at 7T; safety parameters (heart rate, peripheral oxygen saturation,
peripheral temperature and comfort scales) were monitored before, during and
after the MR scans, no (MRI related) adverse events occurred.
Introduction
Neonates with brain injury are at risk
for neurodevelopmental delay. MRI is the gold standard to assess brain
development and injury in neonates [1], and 3T scanners are now routinely used in
neonates by many centers. However, predicting neurodevelopmental outcome often remains
challenging. As ultra-high field MRI showed added value in adults in terms of
resolution, SNR and CNR [2], 7T MRI could also be beneficial for clinical
decision making in neonates.
The aim of
this study is to
investigate the safety and feasibility of 7T MRI in neonates. We show the first MR images of neonates at 7T MRI and provide
information about the study protocol and safety preparations.Methods
Safety preparations
Prior to the initiation of the in-vivo
data collection, we evaluated the RF safety of the setup. Finite difference
time domain simulations were performed (Sim4Life, Zurich Med Tech, Zurich) on a
baby model (Charlie) of the virtual family [3], in different positions in the
coil. We assumed full decoupling to the receiver coils. Peak local SAR (10g
average) and global head SAR for 1 W input power were calculated.
Furthermore, we developed a
prototype acoustic hood for noise protection that fits the 7T MR scanner, using
a layer of 5 cm foam. A
test setup (figure 1) with a dummy MR bore was made in a sound isolated booth
to test the attenuation of acoustic noise with this prototype.
Feasibility
After these safety preparations we
included clinically stable infants, between term (equivalent) age and the
(corrected) age of three months. They underwent a 7T MRI immediately after
their routine 3T MRI scan (both Philips Medical Systems, Best, Netherlands) using
a 2-channel transmit-32 channel receive head coil (Nova Medical, Inc,
Burlington, MA, USA). Noise protection was guaranteed by baby earmuffs and the
acoustic hood. Safety parameters (i.e., heart rate, peripheral oxygen
saturation, peripheral temperature and comfort scales) were monitored before,
during and after the MR scans.
The 7T MR protocol included T1w MPrage and T2w SSh
TSE anatomical imaging, MR Venography (3D-PCA,
0.75x0.75x0.45mm, venc =7cm/s), Susceptibility Weighted Imaging (3D-FEepi, 0.55x0.55x0.27mm,
epi factor 3, 3D flowcomp), MR Angiography (3D-Inflow, 0.3x0.3x0.2mm,) and single-voxel
spectroscopy (MRS; sLASER, TE 36 ms, TR 5000 ms). Results
Safety preparations
RF safety simulations showed that the
global SAR and peak local SAR of the baby model in centered position did not
exceed the SAR of the adult model. However, when the baby model was positioned
50 mm from iso-center in head direction, global SAR levels and peak local SAR
levels exceeded those of the adult model by +13% and +12%, respectively (Table 1 and figure 2). Therefore, positioning of the
baby head in iso-center must be mechanically secured during scanning, for example by adding foam padding.
Acoustic noise protection was evaluated
in a sound booth. The 7T hood attenuated the acoustic noise by 8.5dB. In
comparison, the hood used at 3T [4] attenuated the noise by 7dB.
Feasibility
Ten neonates have been included. Temperature,
heart rate and peripheral oxygen saturation were stable before, during and
after MRI. No serious adverse events occurred.
MRV at 7T shows improved visibility of
the different veins and sinuses compared to 3T i.e. the superficial cerebral
veins can be followed in more detail and the arterial circulation is better
suppressed (Figure 3A+F).
On SWI at 7T, the deep venous
circulation (i.e., the deep medullary veins) is better visible, (Figure 3B+G).
Additional microbleeds have not been identified until now at 7T compared to 3T.
Single-shot T2-weighted imaging at 7T
seems to be of improved quality. In one patient with a perinatal arterial
stroke, perivascular spaces were found at 7T that were not visible at 3T
(Figures 3C+H).
MRA is better at 7T than 3T, because less
noise is visible at 7T making it easier to see the thickness and curves of the
arteries (Figures 3D+I).
T1-weighted imaging does not yet meet
the expected gain at 7T so it requires further improvement to incorporate the
different T1 in neonates compared to adults.
MRS was of improved quality. For example, the patient shown in Figure 3E and 3J
had an increased spectral resolution at 7T compared to 3T that better
visualizes the different choline compounds and NAAG. It was possible to fit
more metabolites with a Cramer-Rao lower-bound < 20% at 7T, such as NAAG and
taurine.Discussion and Conclusion
This pilot study
shows both feasibility and safety of 7T MRI in ten neonates. A
low SAR and acoustic noise could be demonstrated,
while improved
image quality at 7T compared to 3T was seen for SWI and
single-shot T2-weighted imaging, caused by a shorter T2-relaxation time,
improved spatial resolution and increased susceptibility. For MRS the increased chemical shift
dispersion at 7T results in less overlap of different metabolite peaks.
Further technical improvements, like
optimizing B1+, incorporating T1 differences into flip angle and TR of the
reported sequences are ongoing and additional sequences are being tested.
Neonatal imaging at 7T might enable
physicians to assess the extent of injury on a microstructural level, e.g.
diagnosing microbleeds or polymicrogyria, and thereby improve prediction of
neurodevelopment.
Acknowledgements
EW and KA share first authorship. MB
and JW share last authorship.References
1 de Vries L, Benders M, Groenendaal F.
Imaging the premature brain: ultrasound or MRI? Neuroradiology. 2013;55:13–22.
2 Ladd ME, Bachert P, Meyerspeer M,
Moser E, Nagel AM, Norris DG, Schmitter S, Speck O, Straub S, Zaiss M. Pros and
cons of ultra-high-field MRI/MRS for human application. Prog Nucl Magn Reson
Spectrosc. 2018;109:1-50
3. Christ A, Gosselin M, Christopoulou
M, Gosselin M, Neufeld E, Moser H, et al. The Virtual Family — development of
surface-based anatomical models of two adults and two children for dosimetric
simulations The Virtual Family — development of surface-based anatomical models
of two adults and two children for dosimetric simulations. Phys Med Biol.
2010;55:N23–38.
4. Nordell A, Lundh M, Horsch S,
Hallberg B, Åden U, Nordell B, et al. The acoustic hood: a patient-independent device
improving acoustic noise protection during neonatal magnetic resonance imaging.
Acta Pediatr. 2009;98:1278–83.