Zhengshi Yang1, Karthik Sreenivasan1, Xiaowei Zhuang1, Aaron Ritter1, Jessica Caldwell1, Sarah J Banks2, Virendra Mishra1, Marwan Sabbagh1, Dietmar Cordes1,3, and Jeffrey Cummings1,4
1Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health, Las Vegas, NV, United States, 2Department of Neuroscience, University of California, San Diego, CA, United States, 3Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, United States, 4Department of Brain Health, School of Integrated Health Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, United States
Synopsis
Inflammatory reactions contribute to disease progression and severity of
Alzheimer’s disease (AD). While multiple animal studies have suggested that
increased neuroinflammation occurs in AD, few studies have investigated
neuroinflammation in human subjects. This is the first study using the third-generation
TSPO ligand [18F]-GE180 to evaluate the neuroinflammation in AD on
human subjects. Our study suggests that neuroinflammation accumulates together
with amyloid deposition and reaches a plateau when the regional amyloid SUVR
reaches 1.1 threshold. Compared to amyloid pathology, neuroinflammation is more
closely related to hyperconnectivity in MCI/AD subjects.
Introduction
Pre-clinical studies have suggested that the pathology of AD is not
restricted to the accumulated senile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles but is
also related to the neuroinflammation in the activated immune system [1,2]. While multiple animal studies have suggested
that increased neuroinflammation occurs in AD, few studies have investigated
neuroinflammation in human subjects. This is the first study using the third-generation
TSPO ligand [18F]-GE180 to evaluate the neuroinflammation in AD with
human subjects. The interaction between neuroinflammation and amyloid burden or
functional connectivity is investigated. Methods
Ten cognitively normal individuals (CN), six with mild cognitive
impairment (MCI), and three AD dementia subjects characterized with amyloid
imaging with AV45 from the Center for Neurodegeneration and Translational
Neuroscience at Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health were
included. MCI and AD dementia subjects were treated as a single group (AD/MCI
group) in our analysis to increase the sample size for analysis. AV45 PET scan,
GE180 PET scan, and resting state fMRI images were acquired from each subject. Resting
state fMRI volumes were realigned to the first volume. PET scans and resting
state fMRI images were coregistered to individual T1 structural images. Freesurfer
was used to segment T1 images and 78 cortical and subcortical region-of-interest
(ROI) were included in the analysis. Standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR)
images were calculated for GE180 and AV45 positron emission tomography (PET)
scans with cerebellar gray matter as the reference region. The mean SUVR scores
for 78 ROIs were calculated, in addition, the mean SUVR scores for frontal,
cingulate, parietal and temporal area defined by ADNI (http://adni.loni.usc.edu/ ) investigators were
also calculated. The mean time series from 78 ROIs were calculated. Nuisance
regression was applied on ROI time series with realignment parameters and their
first-order derivative, and three Compcor [3] components each from white matter
and cerebrospinal fluid. Low-pass filtering was then applied with frequency cutoff
at 0.2 Hz. Pearson’s correlation between the processed ROI time series was
calculated to construct functional connectivity map. Two-sample t-test was
applied to obtain the functional connectivity difference between AD/MCI and CN
group. In addition, linear regression was applied to compute how strongly the
functional connectivity between each two nodes was associated with
neuroinflammation or amyloid burden, where functional connectivity was treated
as dependent variable and SUVR was treated as independent variable. The regression
coefficient, beta coefficient, was used to evaluate the association between
functional connectivity and PET SUVR. For both group difference and linear
regression, age and gender were treated as covariates.Results
Functional connectivity between 78
ROIs was computed and the mean functional connectivity maps across subjects within
each group were shown in Fig.1a. The effect size of the group difference
between MCI/AD and CN was shown in Fig.1b. For both AV45 and GE180, the mean
SUVR in temporal regions (bilateral middle and superior temporal gyrus) had the
most significant group difference with effect size as 1.24 and 1.17,
respectively. To evaluate whether neuroinflammation and amyloid deposition are
relevant to altered functional connectivity, linear regression was applied on
the functional connectivity on each edge to calculate the beta coefficient for
the mean SUVR in temporal regions as shown in Fig.2. A higher beta coefficient
indicates amyloid/neuroinflammation has more influence on the functional
connectivity between two nodes. The GE180 SUVR images for three individual
subjects with FWHM=4mm Gaussian smoothing were shown in Fig.3. Visually MCI had
more localized higher SUVR intensity compared to CN subject, and AD dementia subjects
showed higher SUVR intensity than CN subject across entire brain. A scatter
plot between regional amyloid SUVR and its corresponding regional
neuroinflammation SUVR for all subjects was shown in Fig.4. A threshold of 1.1
was defined for regional amyloid SUVR, with the observation that neuroinflammation
accumulates in the regions having heavier amyloid burden in the regions under
the threshold with linear regression curve y=0.511+0.456*x (p=0), but slightly
decreases when above the threshold with linear regression curve y=1.095-0.084*x
(p=0.003).Discussion
In this study, we investigated the pathology
of AD in terms of neuroinflammation and amyloid deposition and their relevance
to brain functional connectivity. A comparison of group difference map and beta
coefficient maps (Fig.1b and Fig.2) suggested that the altered functional
connectivity is a mixed effect of neuroinflammation and amyloid deposition, but
driven mostly by neuroinflammation. The altered functional connectivity within
frontal regions, between frontal and other brain regions, and between cingulate
cortex and other brain regions is most relevant to neuroinflammation. In
contrast, the altered functional connectivity between subcortical and
occipital/parietal regions is more relevant to amyloid. There is a turning
point between regional amyloid and neuroninflammation. Brain regional neuroinflammation
was shown to be significantly positively correlated with amyloid burden under
amyloid SUVR threshold 1.1 but remain relatively flat when above the threshold.
This finding suggests that neuroinflammation could be a sensitive measurement
at the preclinical stage of AD.Conclusion
GE180 PET imaging is a means of detecting inflammatory changes in
individuals with amyloid pathology including those with preclinical disease.Acknowledgements
This research project was supported by the NIH (COBRE grant 5P20GM109025 and grant 1R01EB014284), Young Investigator award from Cleveland Clinic, a private grant from Peter and Angela Dal Pezzo, a private grant from Lynn and William Weidner, and a private grant from Stacie and Chuck Matthewson.References
1. Zhang,
B., et al., Integrated systems approach
identifies genetic nodes and networks in late-onset Alzheimer’s disease.
Cell, 2013. 153(3): p. 707-720.
2. Heneka, M.T., et al., Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's disease.
The Lancet Neurology, 2015. 14(4):
p. 388-405.
3. Behzadi, Y. Restom, K., Liau, J.,
Liu, T.T.. A component based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and
perfusion based fMRI. NeuroImage, vol 37, issue 1, August 2007, page 90-101.