Yan Li1, Sean K. Sethi2,3, Chengyan Wang4, Weibo Chen5, Naying He1, Ewart Mark Haacke3, and Fuhua Yan1
1Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China, 2The MRI Institute for Biomedical Research, Magnetic Resonance Innovations, Inc., Detroit, MI, United States, 3Department of Radiology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States, 4Human Phenome Institute, Fudan University, Shanghai, China, 5Philips Healthcare, Shanghai, China
Synopsis
To investigate the correlation of iron
content in deep gray matter nuclei as a function of age by reconstructed quantitative
susceptibility mapping (QSM) using both whole-structural and regional
perspectives from three different MRI sites and three different scanners to
show that QSM is a robust technology across manufacturers and resolution.
Introduction
Iron is the most abundant
transition metal in the brain, and plays a key role in a number of brain
cellular processes including oxygen transport, electron transfer,
neurotransmitter synthesis, myelin production, and mitochondrial function1,
2. A variety of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) methods have been used
to quantify the concentration of brain iron over the years including R2, R2*, phase,
and quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM)1. In theory, as a
quantitative reconstruction method, QSM is independent of echo time, flip angle
and field strength and ideally of the implementation of gradient echo imaging
by manufactural vendors, but there is still a lack of large-scale data
verification. This study investigated the correlation between iron content and
age of healthy volunteers by reconstructing QSM using STrategically Acquired
Gradient Echo (STAGE)3 data from different sites. The consistency of
QSM quantification in multicenter was also evaluated for the 569 healthy adults.Methods
Data acquisition: A total of 569 healthy adults (mean age: 56.65± 12.63 years) were included
from three sites: Dalian, Ruijin, and Zhengzhou, equipped with GE HDX 1.5T (173 cases), Philips Ingenia 3.0T (300
cases), and Siemens Prisma 3.0T (96 cases) scanners. Data were acquired using the
following parameters: voxel sizes= 0.6x0.75x3 (=1.35mm³)/ 0.67x1.34x2(=1.80mm³)/
0.67x1.34x2(=1.80 mm³) and TRs= 53/20/20 ms TEs= 40/17.5/17.5 ms for each
scanner, respectively.
Quantitative analysis: The susceptibility maps were generated using the following steps:
the brain extraction tool (BET) was used to isolate the brain tissue (threshold
= 0.2, erode = 4 and island = 2000) using the first echo where the signal
intensity is highest; a 3D phase unwrapping algorithm (3DSRNCP) to unwrap the
original phase data; sophisticated harmonic artifact reduction (SHARP) to
remove unwanted background fields (threshold = 0.05 and deconvolution kernel
size = 6); and, finally, a truncated k-space division (TKD) based inverse filtering
technique (threshold = 0.1) with an iterative approach (iteration threshold =
0.1 and number of iterations = 4) to reconstruct the susceptibility maps4.
Seven subcortical gray matter nuclei (GMN), caudate nucleus (CN), globus
pallidus (GP), putamen (PUT), thalamus (THA), pulvinar thalamus (PT), red
nucleus (RN) and substantia nigra (SN), were segmented manually based on their anatomical
features in the susceptibility maps, and the susceptibility values in the
regions of interest (ROIs) were assessed.
The 3D
whole-structural measurements were used to determine age-related thresholds,
which were applied to calculate the local iron deposition (RII: portion of the structure
that contains iron concentration larger than three standard deviations above
the mean, correcting for age). Age-susceptibility correlation was determined for
each measured structure for both the whole-region and the high iron content
region RII.
Statistical
analysis: The statistical analysis was performed
using MatLab R2013a (MathWorks, Natick, MA). P < 0.05 was considered
significant. Pearson correlation analysis was applied to investigate the
relation between susceptibility and age in each structure. R2 larger
than 0.25 was considered a strong relationship. Linear regression models were
used to fit the data.Results
All sites showed a
strong linear increase in iron over age for all structures except the THA. The
slopes (ppb/year) between the sites overlapped for all
structures except the PUT and PT for the total iron content and PUT for the RII
analysis (see Figure 1). For region II analysis, the CN showed the strongest
overlap in slopes (see Figure 2). Merging the data into a single large group
led to the linear relationships shown in Table 1. Overall, for each structure analyzed in this study, the regional
analysis showed a higher correlation coefficient and higher slope compared to
the whole-region analysis.Discussion and Conclusions
Results show that the
age-susceptibility correlation can serve as a quantitative magnetic
susceptibility baseline as a function of age for monitoring abnormal global and
regional iron deposition, which agrees with other studies4, 5. A
regional analysis shows a tighter age-related behavior, providing a reliable
and sensitive reference for what can be considered normal iron content for
studies of neurodegenerative diseases. Some structures behaved identically
between scanners while others had some variations in slope as a function of
age. However, some of this variation may be due to the region of interest
drawings and the populations chosen. The GP RII analysis shows many more high
iron points in the Ruijin and Zhengzhou data, possibly caused by including the
lower GP slices. Also, variation can occur as subjects get older, the calcification
and mineralization may severely affect the QSM results.
This study shows that although QSM has the
potential to be a robust technology, great care must be taken in both assessing
given structures and training those drawing the regions. Ideally, an automated
means to assess the structures may improve the agreement between all
structures. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1.Stankiewicz J, Panter S,Neema M
et al. Iron in chronic brain disorders: imaging and neurotherapeutic
implications.[J] .Neurotherapeutics, 2007, 4: 371-86.
2.Hare D, Ayton S, Bush A et al.
A delicate balance: Iron metabolism and diseases of the brain.[J] .Front Aging
Neurosci, 2013, 5: 34.
3.Chen Y, Liu S, Wang Y et al.
STrategically Acquired Gradient Echo (STAGE) imaging, part I: Creating enhanced
T1 contrast and standardized susceptibility weighted imaging and quantitative
susceptibility mapping.[J] .Magn Reson Imaging, 2018, 46: 130-139.
4.Liu M, Liu S, Ghassaban Ket al.
Assessing global and regional iron content in deep gray matter as a function of
age using susceptibility mapping.[J] .J Magn Reson Imaging, 2016, 44: 59-71.
5.Aquino D, Bizzi A, Grisoli M et
al. Age-related iron deposition in the basal ganglia: quantitative analysis in
healthy subjects.[J] .Radiology, 2009, 252: 165-72.