Geoffrey J. Topping1, Irina Heid2, Moritz Mayer2, Lukas Kritzner2, Florian Englert2, Martin Grashei1, Christian Hundshammer1, Katja Steiger3, Katja Peschke4, Markus Schwaiger1, Maximilian Reichert4, Franz Schilling1, and Rickmer Braren2
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany, 2Institute of Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany, 3Institute of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany, 4Internal Medicine II, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
Synopsis
Multimodal imaging
for characterization of pancreatic tumour cellularity and metabolism has
potential to guide treatment. Murine orthotopically transplanted tumours were
imaged with DWI, 13C-pyruvate CSI, and 18F-FDG PET, and
endogenous tumours with DWI and CSI. Transplanted epithelial and mesenchymal
tumours had similar cellularity, shown by ADC, but different metabolism, with
higher mesenchymal AUC ratios and SUV. Compared with other endogenous tumour growth
patterns, classical ductal had lower tumour cellularity (higher ADC), while solid had
higher and more-variable AUC ratios. The combination of these methods can
characterize tumour metabolism, including correcting for tumour cellularity, better
than CSI alone.
Introduction
Pancreatic ductal
adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has poor clinical survival, with urgent need for
biomarkers for tumour differentiation. Multimodal imaging, including measures
of glucose metabolism and cellularity, has the potential to non-invasively
assess tumour metabolic subtype and intra- and inter-tumoural heterogeneity to
guide and monitor treatment.Methods
Murine PDAC tumours were imaged with diffusion weighted MRI (DWI) and hyperpolarized 13C-pyruvate-lactate spectroscopic imaging (CSI), and with 18F-FDG PET.
Tumour models: Murine epithelial (N=3) and mesenchymal (N=4) PDAC cell lines were orthotopically transplanted in mice (CrTac:NCr-Foxn1nu). Separately, CKPlox mice (Ptft1awt/cre; Kraswt/G12D; p53fl/fl) developed endogenous PDAC tumours (N=23 mice, with 29 histologically correlated regions classified epithelial by histology, with mesenchymal and anaplastic excluded from analysis due to low numbers in this cohort).
Imaging Systems: Small animal 7 T preclinical scanner (Agilent/GE magnet, Bruker AVANCE III HD electronics) using a dual-tuned 1H/13C volume coil (31 mm ID; RAPID Biomedical). Small animal PET/CT scanner (Siemens Inveon).
MR Imaging: For all tumours, T2-weighted anatomical RARE, DWI, and 13C CSI were acquired. DWI used an EPI readout with 12 b-values up to 1528 s/mm2 and 0.25x0.25x1.0 mm3 voxels and fit for the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in MatLab. [1-13C]pyruvate was hyperpolarized (Oxford instruments HyperSense DNP), injected (80 mM), and imaged with multi-frame CSI with 2x2x3 mm3 voxels and 5 s / frame. Ratios of the area under the curves (AUCr) of lactate to pyruvate spectral peak time-courses were calculated.
PET Imaging: For orthotopic tumours, 15 min static [18F]-FDG PET images were acquired 1 hour post-injection. Mean standardized uptake values (SUV) were calculated within ROIs derived from coregistered anatomical MRI.
Analysis: Mean ADC, AUCr, and SUV were calculated within regions of interest (defined manually based on histopathological evaluation of H&E staining). Necrotic areas were excluded. Statistical group comparisons and correlations were calculated in GraphPad PRISM.
Histology: Endogenous tumours were extracted, fixed in formalin, and H&E stained and classified as epithelial, mesenchymal, or anaplastic by experienced pathologist (KS). Epithelial tumours were characterized by growth pattern1 (classical ductal, papilliform, small ductal, or solid squamous-like) and by tumour cellularity (low, medium, or high)2.Results
Orthotopic tumour imaging (Fig. 1) showed no significant
differences in ADC between epithelial and mesenchymal groups (Fig. 2). Mean SUV
and 13C AUCr were significantly different and positively correlated
(Fig. 2).
Endogenous epithelial tumours were grouped as classical ductal
with low tumour cellularity, papilliform with medium tumour cellularity, or
small ductal or solid with medium or high tumour cellularity. Tumour histology
examples are shown in Figure 3.
ADC and AUCr values grouped by tumour cellularity and growth
pattern and compared with ANOVA or t‑tests are shown in Figure 4. Considering
all tumours, ADC was separated well by tumour cellularity, and between classical
ductal and papilliform, small ductal, or solid tumours, but not between the
latter three. AUCr was separated between high and med or high and low tumour cellularity,
between solid and classical ductal, and marginally between solid and
papilliform, but not between other pairs.
Endogenous tumour ADC and AUCr values are also
correlated (Fig. 5). Plotting separately the small ductal and solid tumour data
(those with substantial variation within the growth pattern group in Fig. 4)
shows correlation within the solid tumour group as well.Discussion
These results indicate that mesenchymal tumors rely more on
glucose metabolism than do epithelial tumours. The positive correlation of SUVmean
and AUCr in orthotopically implanted tumours suggests that these methods provide
similar information about tumour glucose metabolism. The variation of AUCr (and
SUVmean) indicate that 13C metabolic imaging has
potential to distinguish between tumours of similar cellular density.
Combined DWI and hyperpolarized 13C CSI differentiates
between endogenous PDAC tumours of different tumour cellularity and growth
pattern classification. Classical ductal tumours have distinctly low AUCr and
higher ADC, while solid and small ductal tumours have low ADC and may have high
AUCr. Particularly within solid tumours, ADC and AUCr are inversely correlated,
suggesting combined DWI and 13C metabolic imaging may help correct
metabolic results for variations in tumour cellularity.
Not all tumour types observed could be separated with ADC
and AUCr; papilliform and small ductal tumours had similar presentation, and
may require additional or alternative biomarkers to identify.
PET imaging was omitted for endogenous tumours
in part because the orthotopic results were highly correlated, indicating
minimal additional benefit to acquiring both modalities.Conclusions
Mesenchymal tumors
strongly rely on glucose metabolism in comparison with epithelial tumors. The
combination of diffusion-weighted and 13C-pyruvate-lactate spectroscopic
imaging can characterize endogenous mouse pancreatic tumours better than either
method alone. Classical ductal tumours are well separated from others by their
high ADC and low lactate to pyruvate AUC ratio. Solid tumours have an inverse
correlation between ADC and AUC ratio, suggesting the combination of these
imaging methods can be used to correct metabolic results for cell density.Acknowledgements
We acknowledge support from the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation – 391523415, SFB 824).
Sybille Reder and Markus Mittelhäuser performed PET
measurements.
Iryna Skuratovska processed tissues for histology.
References
1. Schlitter AM, Segler
A, Steiger K, Michalski CW, Jäger C, Konukiewitz B, Pfarr N, Endris V, Bettstetter
M, Kong B, Regel I, Kleeff J, Klöppel G, Esposito I. (2017) Molecular,
morphological and survival analysis of 177 resected pancreatic ductal
adenocarcinomas (PDACs): Identification of prognostic subtypes. Scientific
Reports 7:41064
2. Heid I, Steiger K, Trajkovic-Arsic M, Settles M, Eßwein
MR, Erkan M, Kleeff J, Jäger C, Friess H, Haller B, Steingötter A, Schmid RM,
Schwaiger M, Rummeny EJ, Esposito I, Siveke JT, Braren RF. (2017) Co-clinical
Assessment of Tumor Cellularity in Pancreatic Cancer. Clinical Cancer Research 23(6):1461-1470