Neele S Dellschaft1,2, Christabella Ng3, Caroline Hoad1,2, Luca Marciani2,4, Robin Spiller2,4, Penny Gowland1,2, Alan Smyth2,3, and Giles Major2,4
1Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom, 2Nottingham NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom, 3Division of Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom, 4Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
Synopsis
Cystic
Fibrosis (CF) is a genetic disease leading to sticky mucus. We used MRI to characterise
the effect of CF on gastrointestinal function, comparing people with CF to
matched healthy controls. People with CF had slower orocaecal transit times. No
change in gastric emptying rate was apparent but more free water was present in
their small bowel with reduced small bowel motility and a reduced gastro-ileal
reflex. Some images suggested increased bacterial load in the small bowel. CF
colons were larger. These findings are consistent with sticky chyme impeding
ileal emptying into the colon, causing obstruction to flow, and constipation.
INTRODUCTION
Cystic
Fibrosis (CF) is a life-limiting genetic disease affecting the chloride channel
CFTR, leading to dry, sticky mucus secretion. The respiratory and digestive
systems are the main systems affected since they both rely heavily on
secretions. Digestive disorders present a significant burden in CF. Up to 90%
of people with CF are affected by obstruction of the pancreatic duct, which
prevents enzymes reaching the small bowel and therefore causes malabsorption of
food and reduced growth. Nearly 50% report constipation and up to 20% report
gastrointestinal complications, such as gastro-oesophageal reflux, distal intestinal
obstruction syndrome and rectal prolapse1. The relief of gastrointestinal
symptoms in CF has recently been identified as a research priority2.
MRI
can be used to evaluate various aspects of gut function3–6 but has not yet been used to
investigate CF. We therefore hypothesised that MRI could provide new
information about altered GI function in CF, and could ultimately provide a new
method of clinical assessment and management of GI function in this patient
group in the future.METHODS
We conducted a pilot study of 12 people with CF and 12 healthy controls
matched for age (12-36 years) and gender (7/12 male in both groups). People
with CF had reasonable lung health (≥40% predicted forced expiratory volume in
1 second). Subjects underwent 11 sets of MRI scanning (1 fasting, 10
post-prandial) at intervals of 30-60 minutes using a 3T Ingenia (Philips)
scanner. Standardised meals were given after the initial fasting scans (meal A:
rice pudding with cream and jam, orange juice, water; 2176 kJ) and after the 9th
scanning set (meal B: macaroni cheese, cheesecake, water; 4213 kJ). Our GI MRI
protocols were adapted to accommodate young people with lung disease who
required shorter breath holds. The primary outcome was orocaecal transit time,
assessed by visual identification of arrival of the food bolus in the caecum
(dual-echo gradient echo sequence; TR 110 ms, TE 1.15 and 2.30 ms, FA 60°). Other outcomes
included time to empty gastric contents (transverse turbo spin echo sequence;
TR 508 ms, TE 60 ms, FA 90°), small bowel water content (heavily T2 weighted HASTE sequence; TR 1263
ms, TE 400 ms, FA 90°)3, small bowel motility
(balanced turbo field echo cine MRI in six coronal slices; TR 2.1 ms, TE 1.03
ms, FA 50°, 1 minute of free
breathing)6,7, and colonic volume
(dual-echo gradient echo sequence as above).RESULTS
Scan procedures were acceptable to all study participants. The primary
outcome, orocaecal transit time, was longer in CF than in controls (Figure 1; median
330 minutes vs 210 minutes, Χ2 4.1, P=0.04). There was no difference in the time to empty gastric
contents between the groups (median time 240 minutes in both groups). Small
bowel motility was significantly lower in CF than in healthy controls, both
fasted and as assessed by area under the curve in response to meal A (Figure 2;
fasted P=0.034, AUC T0-T60 Wilcoxon P=0.041). Healthy subjects showed the
normal fall in small bowel water content in response to the second meal
reflecting ileal emptying (Figure 3; median -164 ml in controls) but in CF
patients it did not change (median -20 ml; P=0.005).
Total colon volume throughout the day was higher in CF (AUC 99 L.min (IQR
72-123 L.min) in controls v 147 L.min (IQR 133-164 L.min) in CF, P=0.049; Figure 4). A third of CF
patients were also noted to have changes in the small bowel content MRI signals;
these were similar to changes in CT imaging seen in small bowel obstruction8, due to the
overgrowth of bacteria (faecalisation) in the small bowel (Figure 5).DISCUSSION
Novel,
non-invasive MRI methods can be used to provide serial assessment of multiple
aspects of GI tract function in people with CF, including young people and
dyspnoeic patients. The difference in orocaecal transit (and the similarity in
gastric emptying time) was consistent with previous data using other methods9. For the first time, we showed reduced
small bowel motility, a difference that could previously not be detected in CF
patients using cruder methods10. MRI has also identified signs of
bacterial overgrowth in the small bowel. In future we will compare this with breath tests, an indirect test of bacterial overgrowth in the small bowel often
leading to inconclusive results11,12.
Striking differences
in transit, motility and intestinal content between people with CF and controls
were identified. These changes are consistent with chyme that is stickier,
changed in consistency due to malabsorption, altered ileocecal transit and
constipation.CONCLUSION
This
MRI approach supports hypotheses about CF GI pathophysiology previously built
from animal models using invasive methods13. The observed differences in
intestinal function and contents underlie GI complications in CF such as distal
ileal obstruction syndrome. We are now using MRI to determine if new CF
medications can improve GI function in CF.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. van der Doef, H. P. J. et al.
Constipation in pediatric cystic fibrosis patients: an underestimated medical
condition. J. Cyst. Fibros. Off. J. Eur. Cyst. Fibros. Soc. 9,
59–63 (2010).
2. Rowbotham, N. J. et al. The top
10 research priorities in cystic fibrosis developed by a partnership between
people with CF and healthcare providers. Thorax 73, 388–390
(2018).
3. Hoad, C. L. et al. Non-invasive
quantification of small bowel water content by MRI: a validation study. Phys.
Med. Biol. 52, 6909–6922 (2007).
4. Chaddock, G. et al. Novel MRI
tests of orocecal transit time and whole gut transit time: studies in normal
subjects. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 26, 205–214 (2014).
5. Pritchard, S. E. et al. Fasting
and postprandial volumes of the undisturbed colon: normal values and changes in
diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome measured using serial MRI. Neurogastroenterol.
Motil. 26, 124–130 (2014).
6. Khalaf, A. et al. Cine MRI
assessment of motility in the unprepared small bowel in the fasting and fed
state: Beyond the breathâhold. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 31,
e13466 (2019).
7. Menys, A. et al. Dual
registration of abdominal motion for motility assessment in free-breathing data
sets acquired using dynamic MRI. Phys. Med. Biol. 59, 4603–4619
(2014).
8. Mayo-Smith, W. W. et al. The CT
small bowel faeces sign: description and clinical significance. Clin.
Radiol. 50, 765–767 (1995).
9. Gelfond, D., Ma, C., Semler, J. &
Borowitz, D. Intestinal pH and gastrointestinal transit profiles in cystic
fibrosis patients measured by wireless motility capsule. Dig. Dis. Sci. 58,
2275–2281 (2013).
10. Hedsund, C., Gregersen, T., Joensson, I.
M., Olesen, H. V. & Krogh, K. Gastrointestinal transit times and motility
in patients with cystic fibrosis. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 47,
920–926 (2012).
11. Posserud, I., Stotzer, P.-O., Björnsson,
E. S., Abrahamsson, H. & Simrén, M. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth
in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Gut 56, 802–808
(2007).
12. Riordan, S. M. et al. The
lactulose breath hydrogen test and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. Am.
J. Gastroenterol. 91, 1795–1803 (1996).
13. Munck, A. Cystic fibrosis: evidence for gut inflammation. Int.
J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 52, 180–183 (2014).