Aaryani Tipirneni-Sajja1,2, Ralf Berthold Loeffler2,3, Jane Hankins4, and Claudia Maria Hillenbrand2,3
1Biomedical Engineering, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, United States, 2Diagnostic Imaging, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, United States, 3Research Imaging NSW, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, 4Hematology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, United States
Synopsis
Hepatic iron content (HIC)
assessment by R2*-MRI can be confounded by co-existing fibrosis. Instead, quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) techniques could be used to assess iron content without
being affected by fibrosis. In this study,
we demonstrated that the field maps generated from a multi-spectral auto
regressive moving average (ARMA) model can be used in conjunction with QSM techniques to measure magnetic susceptibility, as
a predictor for HIC.
Introduction
R2*-Magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI) has emerged as a noninvasive and longitudinal monitoring technique
for assessment of hepatic iron overload. A major challenge with this method, however, is that any co-existing
pathologies such as fatty infiltration and fibrosis affect R2* measurements,
and hence would interfere with HIC estimation. In recent years, multispectral signal modeling
techniques such as autoregressive moving average (ARMA) model has demonstrated
to simultaneously quantify R2* and fat fraction (FF); but these techniques are
still confounded by fibrosis.1,2 Alternatively, quantitative
susceptibility mapping (QSM) could be used to assess iron content without being
affected by fibrosis.1 QSM techniques have been well-validated in
brain applications for quantifying iron deposits.3 However, these
techniques have been challenging to implement in abdomen due to problems related
to breathing motion, the presence of subcutaneous/liver fat and/or severe iron
overload that may all hinder the accurate estimation of field map.4 In
this work, we propose to evaluate if ARMA generated field maps can be used in conjunction
with QSM techniques for assessment of hepatic iron overload.Materials and Methods
Ten
1L iron phantoms were constructed from 2% agar-water mixtures and doped with various
amounts of bionized nonferrites particles to obtain a wide range of R2* values. In vivo data covering the entire liver were collected from 27
patients who underwent MRI scans for clinical monitoring of hepatic iron
overload. All patients were scanned on a 1.5T scanner (Magnetom Avanto, Siemens
Healthineers, Malvern, PA) using a 3D multi-echo gradient echo (GRE) sequence (TR/TE/ΔTE
= 16/1.41/1.6 ms, 6 echoes, flip angle = 60, FOV = 350 mm, matrix = 320
x 280, slice thickness = 3.5 mm). Multi-spectral ARMA modeling was performed on
the complex GRE signal acquired in phantoms and patients to calculate R2* and FF
values, and estimate field map via an iterative Stieglitz-McBride algorithm.1,2
The estimated field map was further processed using the projection-onto-dipole-field
(PDF) method to remove background field and produce a local field map.5
Finally, susceptibility maps were generated from the local field maps using the
morphology enabled dipole inversion algorithm.5 Mean R2* and susceptibility
values were calculated by drawing circular ROIs in phantoms and were correlated
to iron concentrations. In patients, 2 circular ROIs were drawn in homogeneous areas
of liver and muscle tissues and the mean susceptibility values were calculated with
reference to muscle. Both R2* and susceptibility values obtained using ARMA
were correlated to HIC values estimated using a previously published calibration
curve.6Results and Discussion
In phantoms, susceptibility values estimated
using ARMA field maps showed a strong linear relationship with iron
concentrations (R2 = 0.9). Representative examples of ARMA calculated
R2*, susceptibility and fat fraction maps in mild (3 < HIC < 7 mg Fe/g),
moderate (7 < HIC < 15 mg Fe/g), and high (HIC > 15 mg Fe/g) cases of
iron overload are shown in Figure 2. The ARMA estimated FF values were <5%
in all cases as our cohort predominantly consists of patients with hepatic iron
overload due to chronic blood transfusions; mainly sickle cell patients with
low BMI. The susceptibility maps generated using the ARMA model for field map
estimation were homogenous with good anatomical depiction of vessels and tissue
boundaries. The R2* and susceptibility values calculated using ARMA model demonstrated
a high and a moderate linear correlation with the HIC values, respectively
(Fig. 3). Although the correlation between HIC and susceptibility values is
less than R2*, our results show the possibility of using ARMA field maps in conjunction
with QSM techniques to generate susceptibility maps for assessment of hepatic
iron overload. Future work will focus on optimizing the acquisition parameters to
improve the estimation of ARMA field map and hence susceptibility maps and to finally
test these methods in iron overloaded patients with co-existing fibrosis and
steatosis.Conclusion
Our preliminary results
show that the ARMA model can be used as a comprehensive technique to estimate susceptibility
maps in addition to R2* and FF maps. This method should be further tested in
patients with co-existing iron overload, fibrosis and/or fatty liver in order to
evaluate the potential value of QSM in assessing iron overload with co-existing
pathologies.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1) Taylor BA JMRI 2012; 2) Tipirneni-Sajja A JMRI 2019; 3) Liu T Magn Reson Med 2011; 4) Sharma SD MRM 2015; 5) Wang Y MRM 2015; 6) Hankins JS Blood 2009