Jiaen Liu1, Erin S. Beck1, Peter van Gelderen1, Pascal Sati1, Jacco A. de Zwart1, Hadar Kolb1, Omar Al-Louzi1, Mark Morrison1, Daniel S. Reich1, and Jeff H. Duyn1
1National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
Synopsis
T2*-weighted MRI at high field is a promising
tool to detect and characterize multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions. However, its
high sensitivity to motion-induced B0 field changes limits the successful
application of this technique in routine clinical use. In this study, we
evaluated our recently developed motion and B0 correction method
using a navigator-based 3D GRE acquisition for imaging MS lesions at 7 T.
INTRODUCTION
T2*-weighted (T2*w) MRI is
a promising technique to detect multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions because of the
magnetic field (B0) effect caused by demyelination and changes in
iron content1–3. The enhanced contrast-to-noise ratio of T2*w MRI at 7 T can
potentially lead to better understanding about the cortical MS lesion and
improved treatment outcome4. However, application of T2*w MRI is challenged by its
sensitivity to B0 changes from other sources, including head motion and
respiration. In a previous study5,6, a time-resolved volumetric EPI (echo-planar imaging) navigator and a retrospective
correction algorithm were developed for correcting the T2*w MRI
affected by motion and motion-induced B0 changes. Here, we performed
an initial study to demonstrate the value of this navigator-based method in MS
imaging.METHODS
MRI scans Nine adults with MS [3
men; 52 (mean) ± 12 (standard deviation) years old] were scanned on a 7 T MRI (Siemens)
equipped with a 32-channel head-only radiofrequency coil (Nova Medical). The
navigator-based 3D T2*w gradient echo (GRE) MRI sequence was applied
at an isotropic 0.5 mm resolution. Fig. 1 illustrates the acquisition of the 3D
EPI navigator and high-resolution GRE data in this sequence. Up to 3 slabs (top,
middle, and bottom along the head-foot direction) of T2*w images
with 32 mm slab thickness were acquired in each patient to cover the brain. A
total of 18 T2*w scans were obtained. In addition, a T1-weighted
(T1w) 3D MP2RAGE (Magnetization Prepared 2 Rapid Acquisition
Gradient Echoes) sequence7,8 at 0.5 mm isotropic resolution
was used to cover the whole brain. Parameters of these two MRI methods are shown
in Fig. 1. The navigator was acquired at a spatial resolution of 6x5.625x2.5 mm3
and temporal resolution of 0.6 s (8 TRs).
Image reconstruction The T1w MP2RAGE was reconstructed using the Siemens research
sequence package (Work-in-Progress Package #900B). The T1w images in
four repetitions were aligned, and the median intensity was assigned to each
voxel. The T2*w images were reconstructed using an in-house
Matlab-based program to correct for rigid-body motion and linear B0
changes (zeroth and first order), which were estimated from the navigator
images. Because of the small extent of motion during the scans in this study, as derived from the
navigator, nonlinear B0 correction was not required, saving image
reconstruction time. Two different levels of correction were carried out: (1)
motion and linear B0 correction (MoCo+B0Co), (2) global B0
correction (gB0Co, only zeroth order). T2*w magnitude images
were averaged across echoes, aligned and resampled to match the processed T1w images.
Image analysis The T2*w image quality was evaluated by two experienced,
blinded MRI raters. One
set of T2*w MoCo+B0Co and gB0Co images per
patient, 5 patients were chosen for the evaluation. These images were selected for
the gB0Co images to cover the range of quality levels. All 10 image
slabs (2 correction modes and 5 patients) were randomized and rated on a scoring
scale from 1 (minimal artifact) to 4 (severe artifact). In addition, the
image intensity difference between the MoCo+B0Co and gB0Co
modes was calculated as the normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) in all 18
scans.RESULTS
As shown in Fig. 2, MS lesions, including lesions in the
cortex, were better defined in the MoCo +B0Co T2*w GRE
images than in the gB0Co images. Lesions in the corrected T2*w
images agreed better with the T1w MRI.
The image quality scores (s) of the five rated T2*w cases are shown in Fig. 3. The across-scan average s of the gB0Co
images was 3 while the average s of the MoCo+B0Co images was
1.5. The rated T2*w
images are shown in Fig. 4, with patient labels corresponding to those in Fig.
3. Different levels of artifact reduction can be observed when comparing the
MoCo+B0Co and gB0Co images in Fig. 4.
The NRMSE in all scans is shown in Fig. 5. The NRMSE between the two
correction modes was 0.18±0.06 across all slabs and 0.17±0.03 in the rated slabs.DISCUSSION
This was a preliminary study to evaluate a navigator-based,
motion-B0-corrected 3D T2*w GRE for detecting MS lesions.
The results showed promising performance of the method by improving the T2*w
image quality from the moderate-to-severe artifact to the minimal-to-mild artifact range, which
translates into enhanced power for lesion delineation, particularly for characterization
of cortical lesions.
In the
current study, only 5 image slabs were rated. However, using NRMSE as a
surrogate, the similar NRMSE across all 18 image slabs to that of the rated
cases suggested similar improvement is expected from the correction in all cases.
This was indeed the case based on visual inspection of all data.
This technique represents a promising solution to address
the problem of motion and motion-induced B0 fluctuation, especially
at high field. It does not require additional hardware and is practical to be
translated to clinical application once successfully established. Future work on evaluating this
technique in a large patient cohort is warranted.Acknowledgements
This work was sponsored by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.References
1. Bagnato,
F. et al. Tracking iron in multiple sclerosis: a combined imaging and
histopathological study at 7 Tesla. Brain J. Neurol. 134, 3602–3615
(2011).
2. Filippi,
M. et al. Association between pathological and MRI findings in multiple
sclerosis. Lancet Neurol. 11, 349–360 (2012).
3. Schindler,
M. K., Sati, P. & Reich, D. S. Insights from Ultrahigh Field Imaging in
Multiple Sclerosis. Neuroimaging Clin. N. Am. 27, 357–366 (2017).
4. Mainero,
C. et al. In vivo imaging of cortical pathology in multiple sclerosis
using ultra-high field MRI. Neurology 73, 941–948 (2009).
5. Liu,
J., Van Gelderen, P., de Zwart, J. A. & Duyn, J. H. Motion-insensitive 3D
T2*-weighted MRI using a motion- and B0 field-navigator. in Proceedings of
the 27th Annual Meeting of ISMRM 72 (2019).
6. Liu,
J., van Gelderen, P., de Zwart, J. A. & Duyn, J. H. Reducing motion
sensitivity in 3D high-resolution T2*-weighted MRI by navigator-based motion
and nonlinear magnetic field correction. Neuroimage (In press).
7. Marques,
J. P. et al. MP2RAGE, a self bias-field corrected sequence for improved
segmentation and T1-mapping at high field. NeuroImage 49, 1271–1281
(2010).
8. Beck,
E. S. et al. Improved Visualization of Cortical Lesions in Multiple
Sclerosis Using 7T MP2RAGE. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 39, 459–466
(2018).