Matthias Weigel1,2,3, Peter Dechent4, Riccardo Galbusera1,2, Rene Mueller5, Govind Nair6, Ludwig Kappos2, Wolfgang Brück5, and Cristina Granziera1,2
1Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk) Basel, Department of Medicine and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland, 2Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland, 3Radiological Physics, Department of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland, 4Department of Cognitive Neurology, MR-Research in Neurology and Psychiatry, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany, 5Institute of Neuropathology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany, 6Translational Neuroradiology Section, Division of Neuroimmunology and Neurovirology, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
Synopsis
MR imaging is an indispensable tool for the depiction of human brain anatomy and pathology. Besides in vivo acquisitions, MRI of the fixated human brain is highly interesting: Very long scan times basically allow unprecedented MRI resolutions on clinical scanners. The present work describes an MRI approach that was developed for standard clinical 3T systems and tests for the viable boundaries: Within scan times between a few hours up to a weekend, acquisitions of high soft tissue contrast with isotropic resolutions up to 200μm can be achieved; revealing fine structure details and allowing an impressing lesion detection and characterization.
Introduction
Postmortem (PM) MR imaging of the ex
vivo healthy and diseased human brain offers the great potential for a
deeper understanding of neuro morphology and pathology, including valuable
comparisons with histopathological analysis1,2. The lack of many
sources of artifacts and possible scan times within the range of ~days
facilitates MR imaging with resolutions and of a quality not achievable for in vivo scans.
Like in a recent experiment achieving even a 100μm resolution3,
PM whole-brain imaging is frequently performed at 7T field strength, since it
generally provides higher SNR per unit time, which is the most limiting factor
in this case in terms of achievable resolution. 3T MR systems, however, have
the benefit of being much more widely available, are more economic in operation,
they provide quite homogeneous excitation (B1+) fields, and, finally,
the acquired PM data allow more direct comparisons with patient data from clinical
routine.
The
purpose of this work was to develop and to test for the viable boundaries of a
very-high resolution MR acquisition approach with a strong soft tissue
contrast, dedicated for whole-brain PM imaging that can be achieved on a
modern, but standard hardware 3T MR system, acquired within the “economical
time of a weekend”.Methods
Brain preparation and
Experimental setup
The brain of a patient with secondary progressive MS was fixated in
10% formalin approx. 36h after autopsy. For MRI acquisition, the brain was
positioned in a dome-shaped container as depicted in 4-6 and immersed
in Fomblin, a fluorinated oil. Air
bubbles were aspirated through the spout of the container through a vacuum
pump. All acquisitions were performed with a 3T wholebody MR system (MAGNETOM PrismaFit,
Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) using the standard 20-channel
phased-array head coil.
Acquisition
Based on our experience that, basically, multi-gradient-echo sequences
harnessed for quantitative susceptibility mapping7 allow to acquire
high-quality PM images under stable signal conditions, an RF spoiled gradient
echo sequence was taken as the initial basis. To circumvent the limitations of
vendor sequences here regarding, e.g., maximal 3D matrix size – they are
usually optimized for clinical in vivo applications – a corresponding in-house
sequence with a strong 4π per voxel spoiler moment and RF spoiling was
programmed. As an additional benefit, a more precise monitoring of the required
MR system performance was feasible.
Three different base protocols with isotropic resolutions of 200μm,
240μm, and 270μm were set up. All experiments used a constant FOV of 192x192mm2.
Protocol specific MR parameters are depicted in Table 1. This table also
informs about repeated acquisitions for later averaging.
To exploit the fast T1 recovery for strong signal generation, the
excitation flip angle was selected close to the Ernst angle8;
however, was chosen a few degrees higher to enhance tissue contrast. A low
bandwidth of 80Hz/Px was employed to further enhance the SNR and to maximize the
time spent for signal acquisition for given TE and TR.
For
image reconstruction, solely the standard MR system reconstruction was used: no
kind of filtering, no interpolation, absolutely no image registration concepts.Results
Figure 1 compares acquisitions with the three base protocols depicted
in Table 1. These were visually perceived as providing sufficient SNR in a
minimum time. Even detailed structures like the basal ganglia are resolved very
nicely, a good signal homogeneity is provided as well.
Based on the 270μm base protocol, Figure 2, left part, presents the
gain in SNR to be expected by means of (here manual) averaging the images of
repeated measurements (Table 1). The right part further illustrates the benefit
of a coronal reformation (upper row) and also contrasts the “best” 200μm
resolution acquisition (right part, lower row). As can be also deduced from these
acquisitions, our complete setup is stable enough for measuring 200μm to 270μm
resolutions over up to 54h (Table 1).
Figure 3 shows the stria of Gennari in the occipital lobe at both 270μm
and 200μm resolution.
Figure
4 shows different small-sized multiple sclerosis lesions (intracortical and
juxtacortical): we could describe for the first time lesion with a paramagnetic
rim extending to both WM and cortical lesion areas (Figure 3 A,I); and others
where the rim was only surrounding the white matter part of the lesions (Figure
3 B,C).Discussion and Conclusion
A postmortem MRI approach was developed that facilitates isotropic resolutions
up to 200μm with a strong soft tissue contrast. Compared to recent 7T studies3
that use a similar acquisition sequence approach, our development is dedicated
to any standard 3T MRI system regarding hardware performance and components
(gradient strength 40mT/m only, 20ch head coil) and does not need any hardware
modifications. Even the “low” 270μm base protocol offers great potential for a
5.5h acquisition time; a protocol that can be easily attached to other
postmortem examinations.
As demonstrated, the full capabilities like a 200μm
acquisition are revealed for our PM approach covering a full weekend, which can
be usually organized well in the light of routine measurements at site. First
clinical results depicted in Figures 3 and 4 underline the impact of 3T based
PM examinations on basic and clinical neuro science.Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the Swiss National Funds PZ00P3_154508, PZ00P3_131914 and PP00P3_176984.References
1. Pfefferbaum A, Sullivan EV, Adalsteinsson E, et al. Postmortem MR imaging of formalin-fixed human brain. Neuroimage 2004;21(4):1585-95.
2. Miller KL, Stagg CJ, Douaud G, et al. Diffusion imaging of whole, post-mortem human brains on a clinical MRI scanner. Neuroimage 2011;57(1):167-181.
3. Edlow B, Mareyam A, Horn A, et al. 7 Tesla MRI of the ex vivo human brain at 100 micron resolution. Sci Data. 2019 Oct 30;6(1):244.
4. Luciano NJ, Sati P, Nair G, et al. Utilizing 3D Printing Technology to Merge MRI with Histology: A Protocol for Brain Sectioning. J Vis Exp 2016 Dec 6;(118).
5. Absinta M, Nair G, Filippi M, et al. Postmortem Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Guide the Pathologic Cut: Individualized, 3-Dimensionally Printed Cutting Boxes for Fixed Brains. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2014;73(8):780-8.
6. Griffin AD, Turtzo C, Parikh G, et al. Traumatic microbleeds suggest vascular injury and predict disability in traumatic brain injury. Brain 2019;142(11):3550-3564.
7. Spincemaille P, Anderson J, Wu G, et al. Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping: MRI at 7T versus 3T. J Neuroimaging 2019. doi: 10.1111/jon.12669. [Epub ahead of print]
8. Ernst RR. Application of Fourier transform spectroscopy to magnetic resonance. Review of Scientific Instruments 1966;37: 93.