Epilepsy cannot be controlled by medications in 30-40% of patients, and in these patients, resection of the epileptogenic focus may be the only hope for a cure. Traditionally, epilepsy surgeries involve craniotomies with resection of substantial portions of the brain. MR-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) provides a minimally invasive alternative. MRgLITT is based on stereotaxic image-guided placement of a small laser fiber into the target and subsequent monitored heating and ablation of the epileptogenic lesion. The technique and advantages, as well as concerns and ways to mitigate them, will be discussed.
Epilepsy cannot be controlled by medications in 30-40% of patients, and in these patients, resection of the epileptogenic focus may be the only hope for a cure. Traditionally, epilepsy surgeries have often included sizable craniotomies with resection of substantial portions of the brain, with significant associated morbidity.
MR-guided laser ablation techniques may have distinct advantages over traditional resections, particularly in regard to the discreteness of the lesions, and the ability to spare adjacent non-epileptogenic tissues.
The most common epileptogenic target using laser ablation techniques is a sclerotic hippocampus and adjacent amygdala in the context of mesial temporal sclerosis. Other epileptogenic lesions, including malformations of cortical development and hypothalamic hamartomas, also lend themselves to laser ablation. Seizure freedom following amygdalohippocampal MRgLITT lesions in the setting of mesial temporal sclerosis are slightly less than for surgical temporal lobectomy. Data is being accumulated whether MRgLITT has benefits versus conventional temporal lobectomy in terms of memory and cognitive preservation. Visual field cuts are a relatively common outcome of MRgLITT for mesial temporal sclerosis presumed to be due to affecting components of Meyer’s loop.
In early 2018 the FDA released a letter to providers cautioning about possible tissue overheating due to inaccurate MR thermography displays on commercial platforms. Additional education and training materials were made available to mitigate issues related to magnetic field changes or “drift” over time. Cautions were raised also about inaccuracies resulting from relying on thermography data in proximity to unstable pixels or when images are subject to motion. To mitigate against the possibility of an underestimated thermal damage estimate, lower laser power and slower tissue heating is viewed as advantageous. Limiting the number of imaging planes, if possible, is also advantageous as this permits more real time assessment of heating.
1. Donos C, Breier J, Friedman E, et al. Laser ablation for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: Surgical and cognitive outcomes with and without mesial temporal sclerosis. Epilepsia. 2018;59(7):1421-1432.
2. Grewal SS, Zimmerman RS, Worrell G, et al. Laser ablation for mesial temporal epilepsy: a multi-site, single institutional series. J Neurosurg. 2018:1-8.
3. Kang JY, Sperling MR. Epileptologist's view: Laser interstitial thermal ablation for treatment of temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. 2018;142:149-152.
4. Pruitt R, Gamble A, Black K, Schulder M, Mehta AD. Complication avoidance in laser interstitial thermal therapy: lessons learned. J Neurosurg. 2017;126(4):1238-1245.
5. Waseem H, Vivas AC, Vale FL. MRI-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy for treatment of medically refractory non-lesional mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: Outcomes, complications, and current limitations: A review. J Clin Neurosci. 2017;38:1-7.
6. Youngerman BE, Oh JY, Anbarasan D, et al. Laser ablation is effective for temporal lobe epilepsy with and without mesial temporal sclerosis if hippocampal seizure onsets are localized by stereoelectroencephalography. Epilepsia. 2018;59(3):595-606.