Muscle Disorders: Emerging Biomarkers
Eric Sigmund1

1New York University Langone Health, United States

Synopsis

Outcomes/Objectives

· Summarize quantitative biomarkers of skeletal muscle function (specifically relaxometry and diffusion-weighted imaging) that access novel physiologic properties

· Describe the role of quantitative modeling for increased specificity

· Describe examples of exercise as a controlled clinical challenge

Target audience

Radiologists, clinicians, technologists, and scientists interested in translational research.

Outcome / Objectives

· Summarize quantitative biomarkers of skeletal muscle function (specifically relaxometry and diffusion-weighted imaging) that access novel physiologic properties

· Describe the role of quantitative modeling for increased specificity

· Describe examples of exercise as a controlled clinical challenge

Purpose

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has come to play an important role in skeletal muscle characterization in health and disease. Beyond qualitative assessment, a wide range of quantitative assays aim to highlight specific biological features to improve differential diagnosis. These approaches involve not only multiple contrast mechanisms (e.g. spin relaxation, water diffusion, perfusion) but in some cases physiological modeling to increase clinical impact. Exercise is another “dimension” of interrogation that further amplifies muscle characterization. This presentation will summarize several quantitative imaging approaches to skeletal muscle that have great potential for clinical impact.

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)

DWI, which measures water motion and its hindrance or enhancement in biological tissue, has many variants to highlight features of skeletal muscle. One is diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) (1), which measures the directional bias of water diffusion and provides metrics of the value and anisotropy of diffusion. Myofiber anisotropy is a natural feature for characterization by diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in healthy (2-4) and pathological muscle (5,6), such as inflammation (6), ischemia, fatty infiltration, compartment syndrome (7,8) or injuries (5,9). Fiber tractography has also been applied to muscle as a means for noninvasive estimation of connectivity, fiber length, and pennation angles (10-13). In fact, particular adaptation of DTI for muscle is growing. Since the approximate diameter of the myofiber membrane (50 mm) is much larger than typical the diffusion lengths (10 mm), restriction effects are moderate. Several studies have thus used stimulated echo preparations with longer diffusion times to increase muscle DTI contrast (7,8,14-21). Several studies have begun to incorporate DTI into biological models for enhanced specificity. In one example (random permeable barrier model (RPBM)) based on topological representation of myofiber membranes, the continuous variation of diffusion time provides estimates of fiber size and permeability (8,22,23). In another case, a combination of T2-weighting and diffusion-weighting coupled with a two water pool model (intracellular and endomysial spaces) supports differentiating a variety of microstructural scenarios (atrophy, edema, fibrosis) (24). Another approach analyzed muscle DTI data alone with a similar two-compartment description (25) in which insights on fiber ellipticity were found, similar to prior work (26).

Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) separately quantifies myofiber microstructure and microvascularity through two-compartment analysis of a range of diffusion-weightings (6,27,28). Histology also confirms that a large fraction of microvasculature in skeletal muscle surrounds and is aligned with each individual myofiber. The muscle IVIM signature is correspondingly anisotropic (27). Diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), an extension of DWI probing microstructural complexity, has recently been explored in skeletal muscle (20,29-31). Initial results suggest kurtosis to be an additive and complementary biomarker to those of DTI. It has also been pointed out that IVIM and DKI effects may be mutually confounding if not quantified separately (30).

Diffusion biomarkers in muscle are often useful not only at rest but after exercise challenge. Skeletal muscle water transport is transiently altered by exercise due to a combination of water exchange, myofiber swelling, and increased perfusion. Correspondingly, exercise response of diffusion-weighted contrast has been observed, (32-34). Static DTI studies (7,8) and dynamic DTI studies (34-39) performed before and after exercise have revealed anisotropic increases in diffusion metrics in calf and thigh muscle. IVIM is a powerful probe of the response of microcirculation to challenge, which is a key element in pathologies. IVIM studies in the forearm (28,34), calf (40), back (34), shoulder (41), and thigh (42) have shown increases in both microstructural and microvascular parameters in activated muscle.

Finally, another type of biomarker has emerged from what was thought to be an artifact. Specifically, seemingly stochastic signal voids in DWI are now believed (through correlation with electromyography (43), connectivity from DTI tractography (44), and direct electrical stimulation (45)) to relate of fasciculation of individual motor units within skeletal muscle. Applications of this approach (such as to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (45)) are at very early stages in this novel area.

Relaxometry (BOLD, T1-mapping, and T2-mapping)

The crucial role of oxygenation in muscle function has led to a significant application of blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) MRI for muscle characterization (46), in the form of T2* weighted imaging or T2* mapping. Furthermore, in analogy to the use of BOLD for neuroimaging, physical challenge (exercise, cuff compression) is typically introduced to modulate the BOLD signal and monitor the kinetics of its subsequent return to equilibrium (47-52). Given the number of possible contributing factors (blood volume, oxygenation, microarchitecture) sophisticated modeling is increasingly pursued to understand the BOLD signal.

Transverse relaxation (T2) mapping also has been applied extensively to muscle(53) to probe pathologic processes (injury, denervation, inflammation). The technique is employed both in single component (monoexponential) T2 measurement in multicompartment measurements as in early measurements (54,55). Technical improvements have included consideration of fat fraction as well as RF pulse imperfections on T2 quantification. Pathologic populations of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (56,57) and inflammatory myopathies (58,59) have been studied with T2 mapping. Elevated muscle signal intensity on T2-weighted imaging following exercise is well-documented (54,60,61). Exercise challenge has also been used in conjunction with T2-mapping for additional specificity (55). T1 mapping has also been increasingly explored as means to quantitatively track fat infiltration and probe the change in macromolecular dynamics in neuromuscular disease (58,62), as well as quantify exercise response (63).

Outlook

As reviewed recently (64), there are several key clinical needs to which quantitative imaging can be devoted for muscle characterization: inflammation / disease activity, fat infiltration, fibrosis, muscle cell morphology. Most techniques surveyed here (and many more) are sensitive to one or more of these features, but defining a test specific to one alone is more challenging. However, each of these applications merits further development to both disentangle contrast mechanisms and optimize clinical impact, possibly by leveraging the advanced models and challenge paradigms mentioned here.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

1. Basser PJ. Inferring microstructural features and the physiological state of tissues from diffusion-weighted images. Nmr in Biomedicine 1995;8(7-8):333-344.

2. Galban CJ, Maderwald S, Uffmann K, de Greiff A, Ladd ME. Diffusive sensitivity to muscle architecture: a magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging study of the human calf. European Journal of Applied Physiology 2004;93(3):253-262.

3. Li K, Dortch RD, Welch EB, Bryant ND, Buck AK, Towse TF, Gochberg DF, Does MD, Damon BM, Park JH. Multi-parametric MRI characterization of healthy human thigh muscles at 3.0 T - relaxation, magnetization transfer, fat/water, and diffusion tensor imaging. NMR Biomed 2014;27(9):1070-1084.

4. Sinha S, Sinha U, Edgerton VR. In vivo diffusion tensor imaging of the human calf muscle. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2006;24(1):182-190.

5. Zaraiskaya T, Kumbhare D, Noseworthy MD. Diffusion tensor imaging in evaluation of human skeletal muscle injury. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2006;24(2):402-408.

6. Qi J, Olsen NJ, Price RR, Winston JA, Park JH. Diffusion-weighted imaging of inflammatory myopathies: polymyositis and dermatomyositis. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI 2008;27(1):212-217.

7. Sigmund EE, Sui D, Ukpebor O, Baete S, Fieremans E, Babb JS, Mechlin M, Liu K, Kwon J, McGorty K, Hodnett PA, Bencardino J. Stimulated echo diffusion tensor imaging and SPAIR T2 -weighted imaging in chronic exertional compartment syndrome of the lower leg muscles. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013;38(5):1073-1082.

8. Sigmund EE, Novikov DS, Sui D, Ukpebor O, Baete S, Babb JS, Liu K, Feiweier T, Kwon J, McGorty K, Bencardino J, Fieremans E. Time-dependent diffusion in skeletal muscle with the random permeable barrier model (RPBM): application to normal controls and chronic exertional compartment syndrome patients. NMR Biomed 2014;27(5):519-528.

9. Heemskerk AM, Drost MR, van Bochove GS, van Oosterhout MFM, Nicolay K, Strijkers GJ. DTI-based assessment of ischemia-reperfusion in mouse skeletal muscle. Magn Reson Med 2006;56(2):272-281.

10. Damon BM, Ding Z, Anderson AW, Freyer AS, Gore JC. Validation of diffusion tensor MRI-based muscle fiber tracking. Magn Reson Med 2002;48(1):97-104.

11. Sinha S, Sinha U, Edgerton VR. In vivo diffusion tensor imaging of the human calf muscle. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24(1):182-190.

12. Schenk P, Siebert T, Hiepe P, Gullmar D, Reichenbach JR, Wick C, Blickhan R, Bol M. Determination of three-dimensional muscle architectures: validation of the DTI-based fiber tractography method by manual digitization. J Anat 2013;223(1):61-68.

13. Okamoto Y, Okamoto T, Yuka K, Hirano Y, Isobe T, Minami M. Correlation between pennation angle and image quality of skeletal muscle fibre tractography using deterministic diffusion tensor imaging. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2012;56(6):622-627.

14. Hata J, Yagi K, Hikishima K, Numano T, Goto M, Yano K. Characteristics of diffusion-weighted stimulated echo pulse sequence in human skeletal muscle. Radiological physics and technology 2013;6(1):92-97.

15. Hiepe P, Herrmann KH, Gullmar D, Ros C, Siebert T, Blickhan R, Hahn K, Reichenbach JR. Fast low-angle shot diffusion tensor imaging with stimulated echo encoding in the muscle of rabbit shank. NMR Biomed 2014;27(2):146-157.

16. Karampinos DC, Banerjee S, King KF, Link TM, Majumdar S. Considerations in high-resolution skeletal muscle diffusion tensor imaging using single-shot echo planar imaging with stimulated-echo preparation and sensitivity encoding. NMR Biomed 2012;25(5):766-778.

17. Noehren B, Andersen A, Feiweier T, Damon B, Hardy P. Comparison of twice refocused spin echo versus stimulated echo diffusion tensor imaging for tracking muscle fibers. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015;41(3):624-632.

18. Giraudo C, Motyka S, Weber M, Karner M, Resinger C, Feiweier T, Trattnig S, Bogner W. Normalized STEAM-based diffusion tensor imaging provides a robust assessment of muscle tears in football players: preliminary results of a new approach to evaluate muscle injuries. Eur Radiol 2018;28(7):2882-2889.

19. Giraudo C, Motyka S, Weber M, Feiweier T, Trattnig S, Bogner W. Diffusion Tensor Imaging of Healthy Skeletal Muscles: A Comparison Between 7 T and 3 T. Invest Radiol 2019;54(1):48-54.

20. Marschar AM, Kuder TA, Stieltjes B, Nagel AM, Bachert P, Laun FB. In vivo imaging of the time-dependent apparent diffusional kurtosis in the human calf muscle. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015;41(6):1581-1590.

21. Steidle G, Schick F. Echoplanar diffusion tensor imaging of the lower leg musculature using eddy current nulled stimulated echo preparation. Magn Reson Med 2006;55(3):541-548.

22. Novikov DS, Fieremans E, Jensen JH, Helpern JA. Random walks with barriers. Nat Phys 2011;7(6):508-514.

23. Fieremans E, Lemberskiy G, Veraart J, Sigmund EE, Gyftopoulos S, Novikov DS. In vivo measurement of membrane permeability and myofiber size in human muscle using time-dependent diffusion tensor imaging and the random permeable barrier model. NMR Biomed 2017;30(3).

24. Berry DB, Regner B, Galinsky V, Ward SR, Frank LR. Relationships between tissue microstructure and the diffusion tensor in simulated skeletal muscle. Magn Reson Med 2018;80(1):317-329.

25. Malis V, Sinha U, Csapo R, Narici M, Smitaman E, Sinha S. Diffusion tensor imaging and diffusion modeling: Application to monitoring changes in the medial gastrocnemius in disuse atrophy induced by unilateral limb suspension. J Magn Reson Imaging 2018.

26. Karampinos DC, King KF, Sutton BP, Georgiadis JG. Myofiber ellipticity as an explanation for transverse asymmetry of skeletal muscle diffusion MRI in vivo signal. Ann Biomed Eng 2009;37(12):2532-2546.

27. Karampinos DC, King KF, Sutton BP, Georgiadis JG. Intravoxel partially coherent motion technique: characterization of the anisotropy of skeletal muscle microvasculature. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI 2010;31(4):942-953.

28. Morvan D. In vivo measurement of diffusion and pseudo-diffusion in skeletal muscle at rest and after exercise. Magn Reson Imaging 1995;13(2):193-199.

29. Cameron D, Bouhrara M, Reiter DA, Fishbein KW, Choi S, Bergeron CM, Ferrucci L, Spencer RG. The effect of noise and lipid signals on determination of Gaussian and non-Gaussian diffusion parameters in skeletal muscle. NMR Biomed 2017;30(7).

30. De Luca A, Bertoldo A, Froeling M. Effects of perfusion on DTI and DKI estimates in the skeletal muscle. Magn Reson Med 2017;78(1):233-246.

31. Filli L, Kenkel D, Wurnig MC, Boss A. Diffusional kurtosis MRI of the lower leg: changes caused by passive muscle elongation and shortening. NMR Biomed 2016;29(6):767-775.

32. Ababneh ZQ, Ababneh R, Maier SE, Winalski CS, Oshio K, Ababneh AM, Mulkern RV. On the correlation between T(2) and tissue diffusion coefficients in exercised muscle: quantitative measurements at 3T within the tibialis anterior. Magma 2008;21(4):273-278.

33. Morvan D, Leroy-Willig A, Malgouyres A, Cuenod CA, Jehenson P, Syrota A. Simultaneous temperature and regional blood volume measurements in human muscle using an MRI fast diffusion technique. Magn Reson Med 1993;29(3):371-377.

34. Filli L, Boss A, Wurnig MC, Kenkel D, Andreisek G, Guggenberger R. Dynamic intravoxel incoherent motion imaging of skeletal muscle at rest and after exercise. NMR Biomed 2015;28(2):240-246.

35. Rockel C, Akbari A, Kumbhare DA, Noseworthy MD. Dynamic DTI (dDTI) shows differing temporal activation patterns in post-exercise skeletal muscles. Magma 2017;30(2):127-138.

36. Baete SH, Cho G, Sigmund EE. Multiple-echo diffusion tensor acquisition technique (MEDITATE) on a 3T clinical scanner. NMR Biomed 2013;26(11):1471-1483.

37. Baete SH, Cho GY, Sigmund EE. Dynamic diffusion-tensor measurements in muscle tissue using the single-line multiple-echo diffusion-tensor acquisition technique at 3T. NMR Biomed 2015;28(6):667-678.

38. Sigmund EE, Baete SH, Luo T, Patel K, Wang D, Rossi I, Duarte A, Bruno M, Mossa D, Femia A, Ramachandran S, Stoffel D, Babb JS, Franks AG, Bencardino J. MRI assessment of the thigh musculature in dermatomyositis and healthy subjects using diffusion tensor imaging, intravoxel incoherent motion and dynamic DTI. Eur Radiol 2018;28(12):5304-5315.

39. Sigmund EE, Baete SH, Patel K, Wang D, Stoffel D, Otazo R, Parasoglou P, Bencardino J. Spatially resolved kinetics of skeletal muscle exercise response and recovery with multiple echo diffusion tensor imaging (MEDITI): a feasibility study. MAGMA 2018;31(5):599-608.

40. Mastropietro A, Porcelli S, Cadioli M, Rasica L, Scalco E, Gerevini S, Marzorati M, Rizzo G. Triggered intravoxel incoherent motion MRI for the assessment of calf muscle perfusion during isometric intermittent exercise. NMR Biomed 2018;31(6):e3922.

41. Nguyen A, Ledoux JB, Omoumi P, Becce F, Forget J, Federau C. Application of intravoxel incoherent motion perfusion imaging to shoulder muscles after a lift-off test of varying duration. NMR Biomed 2016;29(1):66-73.

42. Adelnia F, Shardell M, Bergeron CM, Fishbein KW, Spencer RG, Ferrucci L, Reiter DA. Diffusion-weighted MRI with intravoxel incoherent motion modeling for assessment of muscle perfusion in the thigh during post-exercise hyperemia in younger and older adults. NMR Biomed 2019:e4072.

43. Schwartz M, Steidle G, Martirosian P, Ramos-Murguialday A, Preissl H, Stemmer A, Yang B, Schick F. Spontaneous mechanical and electrical activities of human calf musculature at rest assessed by repetitive single-shot diffusion-weighted MRI and simultaneous surface electromyography. Magn Reson Med 2018;79(5):2784-2794.

44. Schwartz M, Martirosian P, Steidle G, Erb M, Stemmer A, Yang B, Schick F. Volumetric assessment of spontaneous mechanical activities by simultaneous multi-slice MRI techniques with correlation to muscle fiber orientation. NMR Biomed 2018;31(11):e3959.

45. Whittaker RG, Porcari P, Braz L, Williams TL, Schofield IS, Blamire AM. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of human motor unit fasciculation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2019;85(3):455-459.

46. Jacobi B, Bongartz G, Partovi S, Schulte AC, Aschwanden M, Lumsden AB, Davies MG, Loebe M, Noon GP, Karimi S, Lyo JK, Staub D, Huegli RW, Bilecen D. Skeletal muscle BOLD MRI: from underlying physiological concepts to its usefulness in clinical conditions. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012;35(6):1253-1265.

47. Towse TF, Elder CP, Bush EC, Klockenkemper SW, Bullock JT, Dortch RD, Damon BM. Post-contractile BOLD contrast in skeletal muscle at 7 T reveals inter-individual heterogeneity in the physiological responses to muscle contraction. NMR Biomed 2016;29(12):1720-1728.

48. Towse TF, Childs BT, Sabin SA, Bush EC, Elder CP, Damon BM. Comparison of muscle BOLD responses to arterial occlusion at 3 and 7 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 2016;75(3):1333-1340.

49. Muller MD, Li Z, Sica CT, Luck JC, Gao Z, Blaha CA, Cauffman AE, Ross AJ, Winkler NJ, Herr MD, Brandt K, Wang J, Gallagher DC, Karunanayaka P, Vesek J, Leuenberger UA, Yang QX, Sinoway LI. Muscle oxygenation during dynamic plantar flexion exercise: combining BOLD MRI with traditional physiological measurements. Physiol Rep 2016;4(20).

50. Partovi S, Karimi S, Jacobi B, Schulte AC, Aschwanden M, Zipp L, Lyo JK, Karmonik C, Muller-Eschner M, Huegli RW, Bongartz G, Bilecen D. Clinical implications of skeletal muscle blood-oxygenation-level-dependent (BOLD) MRI. MAGMA 2012;25(4):251-261.

51. Damon BM, Wadington MC, Hornberger JL, Lansdown DA. Absolute and relative contributions of BOLD effects to the muscle functional MRI signal intensity time course: effect of exercise intensity. Magn Reson Med 2007;58(2):335-345.

52. Meyer RA, Towse TF, Reid RW, Jayaraman RC, Wiseman RW, McCully KK. BOLD MRI mapping of transient hyperemia in skeletal muscle after single contractions. NMR Biomed 2004;17(6):392-398.

53. Patten C, Meyer RA, Fleckenstein JL. T2 mapping of muscle. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2003;7(4):297-305.

54. Saab G, Thompson RT, Marsh GD. Multicomponent T2 relaxation of in vivo skeletal muscle. Magn Reson Med 1999;42(1):150-157.

55. Saab G, Thompson RT, Marsh GD. Effects of exercise on muscle transverse relaxation determined by MR imaging and in vivo relaxometry. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2000;88(1):226-233.

56. Kim HK, Laor T, Horn PS, Racadio JM, Wong B, Dardzinski BJ. T2 mapping in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: distribution of disease activity and correlation with clinical assessments. Radiology 2010;255(3):899-908.

57. Yin L, Xie ZY, Xu HY, Zheng SS, Wang ZX, Xiao JX, Yuan Y. T2 Mapping and Fat Quantification of Thigh Muscles in Children with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. Curr Med Sci 2019;39(1):138-145.

58. Huber AT, Lamy J, Bravetti M, Bouazizi K, Bacoyannis T, Roux C, De Cesare A, Rigolet A, Benveniste O, Allenbach Y, Kerneis M, Cluzel P, Redheuil A, Kachenoura N. Comparison of MR T1 and T2 mapping parameters to characterize myocardial and skeletal muscle involvement in systemic idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM). Eur Radiol 2019.

59. Ran J, Ji S, Morelli JN, Wu G, Li X. T2 mapping in dermatomyositis/polymyositis and correlation with clinical parameters. Clin Radiol 2018;73(12):1057 e1013-1057 e1018.

60. Andreisek G, White LM, Sussman MS, Langer DL, Patel C, Su JWS, Haider MA, Stainsby JA. T2*-Weighted and Arterial Spin Labeling MRI of Calf Muscles in Healthy Volunteers and Patients With Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome: Preliminary Experience. Am J Roentgenol 2009;193(4):W327-W333.

61. Ababneh Z, Beloeil H, Berde CB, Gambarota G, Maier SE, Mulkern RV. Biexponential parameterization of diffusion and T2 relaxation decay curves in a rat muscle edema model: decay curve components and water compartments. Magn Reson Med 2005;54(3):524-531.

62. Marty B, Coppa B, Carlier PG. Monitoring skeletal muscle chronic fatty degenerations with fast T1-mapping. Eur Radiol 2018;28(11):4662-4668.

63. Varghese J, Scandling D, Joshi R, Aneja A, Craft J, Raman SV, Rajagopalan S, Simonetti OP, Mihai G. Rapid assessment of quantitative T1, T2 and T2* in lower extremity muscles in response to maximal treadmill exercise. NMR Biomed 2015;28(8):998-1008.

64. Strijkers GJ, Araujo ECA, Azzabou N, Bendahan D, Blamire A, Burakiewicz J, Carlier PG, Damon B, Deligianni X, Froeling M, Heerschap A, Hollingsworth KG, Hooijmans MT, Karampinos DC, Loudos G, Madelin G, Marty B, Nagel AM, Nederveen AJ, Nelissen JL, Santini F, Scheidegger O, Schick F, Sinclair C, Sinkus R, de Sousa PL, Straub V, Walter G, Kan HE. Exploration of New Contrasts, Targets, and MR Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques for Neuromuscular Disease - A Workshop Report of Working Group 3 of the Biomedicine and Molecular Biosciences COST Action BM1304 MYO-MRI. J Neuromuscul Dis 2019;6(1):1-30.

Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 27 (2019)