DCE-MRI: Acquisition
Chad Quarles1

1Division of Neuroimaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, United States

Synopsis

The overall purpose of this educational lecture is to discuss conventional and state-of-the-art acquisition methods for DCE-MRI. Topics will include protocol design informed by contrast mechanisms, sensitivity and spatiotemporal demands and advances in DCE-MRI acquisition methods based on technological advances (e.g. novel sampling schemes) and designed to enhance sensitivity to a greater range of physiologic properties.

Target Audience

Basic research scientists and clinicians who wish to learn about conventional and state-of-the-art pulse sequence options for DCE-MRI data acquisition

Objectives

At the end of this lecture participants should be able to:

  • Describe the underlying factors (e.g. biophysics, sensitivity, kinetics, resolution) that inform DCE-MRI pulse sequence design and parameter selection
  • Identify robust acquisition protocols for conventional DCE-MRI
  • Describe how pulse sequences can be designed to leverage the biophysical basis of DCE-MRI contrast to assess a greater range of physiological features.
  • Describe recent advances in DCE-MRI pulse sequence design for improved spatiotemporal resolution and multi-contrast imaging.

Introduction

Dynamic Contrast Enhanced (DCE)-MRI methods rely upon the acquisition of dynamic MRI signals in order to track the dynamic passage of exogenously administered contrast agents (CA). DCE-MRI methods track changes in CA induced T1 changes in order to assess kinetic features such as the volume transfer coefficient, Ktrans, and the volume fraction of the extravascular space (ve). As one may expect, the reliability of the extracted kinetic features from DCE-MRI is heavily influenced by the pulse sequence type and input parameters. Acquisition details should account for the underlying biophysical basis of the contrast mechanisms, spatial, and temporal resolution and SNR requirements, and site-specific optimizations. The goal of this lecture will be to describe the motivation and requirements for robust DCE-MRI data acquisition, current best practices and opportunities for development.

DCE-MRI Acquisition Methods

In order to estimate Ktrans and ve (the parameters most commonly assessed using DCE-MRI), the CA-induced MRI signal changes need to be assessed. The signal evolution in tissues of interest is slower than the first-pass kinetics measured with DSC-MRI, and enables the use of acquisitions with lower temporal and higher spatial resolution. With lower temporal resolution requirements, DCE-MRI protocols do not require EPI and are typically acquired using a 3D fast spoiled gradient recalled echo sequence. Organizations (e.g. RSNA-QIBA) have released standardized, best practice protocols for DCE-MRI to improve multi-site consistency and facilitate comparisons (1). Since DCE-MRI can be used in most human tissues, organ specific pulse sequence optimizations are frequently developed (2-4).

Kinetic analysis of DCE-MRI data requires pre-contrast T1 mapping in order to relate signal changes to CA concentration. While inversion recovery techniques are known to provide the most robust estimates of T1 their scan times are prohibitive, which has led to the use of multi-flip angle (which is the recommended approach) and, to a lesser extent, look locker techniques. For accurate kinetic analysis the arterial input function also needs to be quantified, thereby necessitating the use of higher temporal resolution (typically <10 sec/image) and rapid bolus injection (3 – 4 mL/sec). To enable higher spatial resolution multi-dose strategies may be used, where a low dose injection and high-temporal resolution imaging is used initially for AIF quantification followed by a standard dose of CA and higher spatial resolution dynamic imaging (5,6). AIF quantification may also be improved though the use of multi-echo acquisitions, as they enable the removal of unwanted, competing T2* contributions.

Technological improvements continue to shape DCE-MRI acquisition options, offering improved spatiotemporal resolution. Numerous studies have leveraged time-resolved MR angiography sequences, which are typically keyhole imaging methods, in order to achieve higher spatiotemporal DCE-MRI data in prostate and breast cancer (7-9). Further improvements have been gained through the application of compressed sensing or multi-band acquisition strategies (2,3,10-12).

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

  1. DCE MRI Quantification Profile, Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance. 2012 Jul 1;:1–46.
  2. Zhang T, Cheng JY, Potnick AG, Barth RA, Alley MT, Uecker M, et al. Fast pediatric 3D free-breathing abdominal dynamic contrast enhanced MRI with high spatiotemporal resolution. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Feb;41(2):460–73. PMCID: PMC40656443.
  3. Rossi Espagnet MC, Bangiyev L, Haber M, Block KT, Babb J, Ruggiero V, et al. High-Resolution DCE-MRI of the Pituitary Gland Using Radial k-Space Acquisition with Compressed Sensing Reconstruction. American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2015 Aug;36(8):1444–9. PMCID: PMC45376794.
  4. Bauman G, Johnson KM, Bell LC, Velikina JV, Samsonov AA, Nagle SK, et al. Three-dimensional pulmonary perfusion MRI with radial ultrashort echo time and spatial-temporal constrained reconstruction. Magn Reson Med. 2015 Feb;73(2):555–64. PMCID: PMC41569345.
  5. Veldhoen S, Oechsner M, Fischer A, Weng AM, Kunz AS, Bley TA, et al. Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Quantitative Lung Perfusion Imaging Using the Dual-Bolus Approach: Comparison of 3 Contrast Agents and Recommendation of Feasible Doses. Invest Radiol. 2016 Mar;51(3):186–93.
  6. Wang S, Fan X, Medved M, Pineda FD, Yousuf A, Oto A, et al. Arterial input functions (AIFs) measured directly from arteries with low and standard doses of contrast agent, and AIFs derived from reference tissues. Magnetic resonance imaging. 2016 Feb;34(2):197–203. PMCID: PMC50063877.
  7. Tudorica LA, Oh KY, Roy N, Kettler MD, Chen Y, Hemmingson SL, et al. A feasible high spatiotemporal resolution breast DCE-MRI protocol for clinical settings. Magnetic resonance imaging. Elsevier Inc; 2012 Jul 3;:1–11. PMCID: PMC34664028.
  8. Le Y, Kipfer HD, Nickel DM, Kroeker R, Dale BM, Holz SP, et al. Initial Experience of Applying TWIST-Dixon With Flexible View Sharing in Breast DCE-MRI. Clin. Breast Cancer. 2015 Nov 26.
  9. Othman AE, Falkner F, Martirosian P, Schraml C, Schwentner C, Nickel D, et al. Optimized Fast Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate: Effect of Sampling Duration on Pharmacokinetic Parameters. Invest Radiol. 2016 Feb;51(2):106–12.
  10. Chen B, Zhao K, Li B, Cai W, Wang X, Zhang J, et al. High temporal resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using compressed sensing-combined sequence in quantitative renal perfusion measurement. Magnetic resonance imaging. 2015 Oct;33(8):962–9.
  11. Kim SG, Feng L, Grimm R, Freed M, Block KT, Sodickson DK, et al. Influence of temporal regularization and radial undersampling factor on compressed sensing reconstruction in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the breast. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Jan;43(1):261–9. PMCID: PMC466683612.
  12. Han S, Cho H. Temporal resolution improvement of calibration-free dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI with compressed sensing optimized turbo spin echo: The effects of replacing turbo factor with compressed sensing accelerations. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Dec 29.
Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 27 (2019)