Basic BOLD Physiology
Avery J.L. Berman1

1Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA, United States

Synopsis

Functional MRI (fMRI) based on the blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signal has been used by researchers over the last 25+ years to non-invasively map brain activity and to measure brain physiology. This lecture will explain the basic biophysical principles that enable the use of the BOLD signal as a surrogate measure of brain activity. Topics covered fall into the domains of BOLD-related cerebrovascular physiology (basics of neurovascular coupling) and BOLD MR physics (blood oxygenation-dependence of T2 and T2*). Building on this basic understanding will help us better interpret BOLD signals and their spatial specificity.

Introduction

Functional MRI (fMRI) based on the blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signal has been used by neuroscientists, clinicians, and MR physicists over the last 25+ years to non-invasively map brain activity and to measure brain physiology. This lecture will explain the basic biophysical principles that enable the use of the BOLD signal as a surrogate measure of brain activity.

BOLD-Related Physiology

At the cellular level, neurons generate electrical signals to transmit information over a range of distances. This is mediated by the coordinated flow of ions across the cell membrane and the release of neurotransmitters at neuronal synapses. Returning the ionic and neurotransmitter concentration gradients to their resting levels is an energetically demanding process that is fuelled by adenosine triphosphate (ATP) consumption, and the ATP is replenished primarily by oxidative metabolism of glucose (2). In fact, the brain consumes ~25% of the body’s total glucose and ~20% of the oxygen to maintain these basal levels, despite accounting for just 2% of body mass.

The brain has no oxygen or glucose reserves and this demand must be met by the constant supply of arterial blood carrying these substrates. Glucose is dissolved in plasma and is actively transported into tissue when it enters the capillary bed. Oxygen, on the other hand, passively diffuses from plasma to tissue in the capillary bed and pre-capillary arterioles (3), however, it has very low solubility in plasma; to compensate, nearly all oxygen is transported bound to hemoglobin contained in red blood cells (RBCs) (4). Metabolic waste products, including carbon dioxide, diffuse back into the blood stream and are removed from the tissue bed by the venous drainage system. The amount of oxygen extracted at rest is ~35-45% and is remarkably uniform across the brain (5).

To meet the increased energetic demands upon neuronal activation, smooth muscle surrounding pre-capillary arterioles relaxes, driven by various signalling mechanisms (6-8), increasing the arteriolar diameter, reducing vascular resistance to flow (9), and thereby increasing flow into the vessel network. Downstream capillaries and venules passively dilate in response to the increased upstream pressure, albeit by a debated amount (9-13). This relationship between neuronal activity, energy metabolism, and CBF is known as neurovascular coupling and it provides the physiological foundation for most functional neuroimaging.

Physical Principles of the BOLD Signal

The physical basis of BOLD fMRI is dependent on the fact that the majority of oxygen in the body is transported bound to hemoglobin within blood. Each hemoglobin molecule contains four paramagnetic iron ions (Fe2+) that can each bind an oxygen molecule. The binding of oxygen to hemoglobin changes its magnetic susceptibility, χ, from paramagnetic (χ > 0) in the deoxygenated state to diamagnetic (χ < 0) in the oxygenated state (14). The susceptibilities of blood and the surrounding tissue are close to matched when the blood oxygen saturation level (SO2: the fraction of hemoglobin molecules in the oxygenated state) is near 100% as is the case typically in arterial blood (15). Where magnetic susceptibilities differ, offsets in the local B0 field arise, leading to quicker dephasing of transverse magnetization, i.e., shortened irreversible and apparent transverse magnetization relaxation times (T2 and T2*, respectively). Therefore, due to the compartmentalization of hemoglobin in RBCs and of RBCs in vessels, strong field offsets are generated in and around RBCs and vessels, resulting in intra- and extra-vascular changes in T2 and T2* that depend on SO2 (16-20). This SO2-dependence of intra- and extra-vascular T2 and T2* forms the basis of the BOLD signal, primarily exploited through T2*-weighted imaging.

Much of our understanding of BOLD MR physics has originated from early analytical and numerical modelling of transverse dephasing throughout vessel networks and related susceptibility distributions (19-23). These modelling results have shown that the dependence of the extravascular transverse relaxation rate (R2*) on deoxygenated blood volume (DBV) and the concentration of deoxyhemoglobin in blood ([dHb]) is$$R_2^* \propto DBV [dHb]^β.$$ The exponent β is in the range of 1–2 and it captures different vessel size contributions to the BOLD signal arising from diffusion of water (19,20,24-26), discussed more below. More importantly, this basic relation helps inform our interpretation of how different physiological factors may impact the BOLD signal based on how they may affect DBV or [dHb].

What ultimately enables the use of the BOLD signal as a surrogate marker of neural activity is that during the hemodynamic response to neuronal activation, there is a significantly larger increase in CBF than in oxygen consumption resulting in an oversupply of oxygenated blood (27,28), referred to as functional hyperemia. This results in a decrease of the venous concentration of deoxygenated hemoglobin, an increase in T2*, and, therefore, an increase in the measured BOLD signal (29-31). In sum, increased neural activity leads to an increased BOLD signal under normal physiological conditions.

Specificity of the BOLD Signal

The spatial precision with which the BOLD signal can detect neuronal activation depends on physiological factors (how finely blood flow is regulated at the microvascular level) and physical factors (which vessel/tissue compartments contribute to the observed BOLD signal). A detailed overview of microvascular blood flow regulation is beyond the scope of this lecture, but recent work, primarily using optical imaging in rodents, suggests that there is tight spatio-temporal regulation of blood flow at the level of pre-capillary arterioles that closely tracks neuronal activity (6-8,10,13,32-34).

Due to the interplay of water diffusion and the size of the field offsets generated by the vasculature, gradient echo BOLD signals are most sensitive to oxygenation changes in large vessels (20). As a result, oxygenation changes in large venous vessels relatively far downstream from the site of neural activation may elicit significant BOLD changes (35). Similarly, intravascular BOLD signal changes can also be largest in downstream vessels and may contribute significantly to the total BOLD signal at fields ≤ 3 T (36), further reducing BOLD’s spatial specificity.

Summary

The BOLD signal arises from the complex combination of hemodynamic and metabolic changes upon neural activation. By sensitizing the MR signal to the focal changes in T2*, BOLD has provided researchers with an invaluable tool for localizing evoked or correlated changes in brain activity.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the NIH NIBIB (grants P41-EB015896, R01-EB019437, and R01-EB016695), by the BRAIN Initiative (NIH NIMH grant R01-MH111419 and NIBIB grant U01-EB025162), and by the MGH/HST Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging.

References

1. Attwell D, Laughlin SB. An energy budget for signaling in the grey matter of the brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2001;21(10):1133-1145.

2. Sakadzic S, Mandeville ET, Gagnon L, Musacchia JJ, Yaseen MA, Yucel MA, Lefebvre J, Lesage F, Dale AM, Eikermann-Haerter K, Ayata C, Srinivasan VJ, Lo EH, Devor A, Boas DA. Large arteriolar component of oxygen delivery implies a safe margin of oxygen supply to cerebral tissue. Nat Commun 2014;5:5734.

3. Severinghaus JW. Simple, accurate equations for human blood O2 dissociation computations. Journal of applied physiology 1979;46(3):599-602.

4. Raichle ME, MacLeod AM, Snyder AZ, Powers WJ, Gusnard DA, Shulman GL. A default mode of brain function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2001;98(2):676-682.

5. Tian P, Teng IC, May LD, Kurz R, Lu K, Scadeng M, Hillman EM, De Crespigny AJ, D'Arceuil HE, Mandeville JB, Marota JJ, Rosen BR, Liu TT, Boas DA, Buxton RB, Dale AM, Devor A. Cortical depth-specific microvascular dilation underlies laminar differences in blood oxygenation level-dependent functional MRI signal. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2010;107(34):15246-15251.

6. Longden TA, Dabertrand F, Koide M, Gonzales AL, Tykocki NR, Brayden JE, Hill-Eubanks D, Nelson MT. Capillary K(+)-sensing initiates retrograde hyperpolarization to increase local cerebral blood flow. Nature neuroscience 2017;20(5):717-726.

7. Rungta RL, Chaigneau E, Osmanski BF, Charpak S. Vascular Compartmentalization of Functional Hyperemia from the Synapse to the Pia. Neuron 2018;99(2):362-375 e364.

8. Boas DA, Jones SR, Devor A, Huppert TJ, Dale AM. A vascular anatomical network model of the spatio-temporal response to brain activation. Neuroimage 2008;40(3):1116-1129.

9. Hillman EM, Devor A, Bouchard MB, Dunn AK, Krauss GW, Skoch J, Bacskai BJ, Dale AM, Boas DA. Depth-resolved optical imaging and microscopy of vascular compartment dynamics during somatosensory stimulation. Neuroimage 2007;35(1):89-104.

10. Mandeville JB, Marota JJ, Ayata C, Zaharchuk G, Moskowitz MA, Rosen BR, Weisskoff RM. Evidence of a cerebrovascular postarteriole windkessel with delayed compliance. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1999;19(6):679-689.

11. Devor A, Tian P, Nishimura N, Teng IC, Hillman EM, Narayanan SN, Ulbert I, Boas DA, Kleinfeld D, Dale AM. Suppressed neuronal activity and concurrent arteriolar vasoconstriction may explain negative blood oxygenation level-dependent signal. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 2007;27(16):4452-4459.

12. Stefanovic B, Hutchinson E, Yakovleva V, Schram V, Russell JT, Belluscio L, Koretsky AP, Silva AC. Functional reactivity of cerebral capillaries. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2008;28(5):961-972.

13. Pauling L, Coryell CD. The Magnetic Properties and Structure of Hemoglobin, Oxyhemoglobin and Carbonmonoxyhemoglobin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1936;22(4):210-216.

14. Weisskoff RM, Kiihne S. MRI susceptometry: image-based measurement of absolute susceptibility of MR contrast agents and human blood. Magn Reson Med 1992;24(2):375-383.

15. Thulborn KR, Waterton JC, Matthews PM, Radda GK. Oxygenation dependence of the transverse relaxation time of water protons in whole blood at high field. Biochim Biophys Acta 1982;714(2):265-270.

16. Berman AJL, Pike GB. Transverse signal decay under the weak field approximation: Theory and validation. Magn Reson Med 2018;80(1):341-350.

17. Ogawa S, Lee TM, Nayak AS, Glynn P. Oxygenation-sensitive contrast in magnetic resonance image of rodent brain at high magnetic fields. Magn Reson Med 1990;14(1):68-78.

18. Ogawa S, Menon RS, Tank DW, Kim SG, Merkle H, Ellermann JM, Ugurbil K. Functional brain mapping by blood oxygenation level-dependent contrast magnetic resonance imaging. A comparison of signal characteristics with a biophysical model. Biophysical journal 1993;64(3):803-812.

19. Boxerman JL, Hamberg LM, Rosen BR, Weisskoff RM. MR Contrast Due to Intravascular Magnetic-Susceptibility Perturbations. Magn Reson Med 1995;34(4):555-566.

20. Yablonskiy DA, Haacke EM. Theory of NMR signal behavior in magnetically inhomogeneous tissues: the static dephasing regime. Magn Reson Med 1994;32(6):749-763.

21. Weisskoff RM, Zuo CS, Boxerman JL, Rosen BR. Microscopic susceptibility variation and transverse relaxation: theory and experiment. Magn Reson Med 1994;31(6):601-610.

22. Kennan RP, Zhong J, Gore JC. Intravascular susceptibility contrast mechanisms in tissues. Magn Reson Med 1994;31(1):9-21.

23. Davis TL, Kwong KK, Weisskoff RM, Rosen BR. Calibrated functional MRI: mapping the dynamics of oxidative metabolism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1998;95(4):1834-1839.

24. Berman AJ, Pike GB. Breaking beta: Understanding the beta-value in calibrated fMRI. 2016; Singapore. p 506.

25. Cheng X, Berman AJL, Polimeni JR, Buxton RB, Gagnon L, Devor A, Sakadzic S, Boas DA. Dependence of the MR signal on the magnetic susceptibility of blood studied with models based on real microvascular networks. Magn Reson Med 2019.

26. Hoge RD, Atkinson J, Gill B, Crelier GR, Marrett S, Pike GB. Investigation of BOLD signal dependence on cerebral blood flow and oxygen consumption: the deoxyhemoglobin dilution model. Magn Reson Med 1999;42(5):849-863.

27. Fox PT, Raichle ME, Mintun MA, Dence C. Nonoxidative glucose consumption during focal physiologic neural activity. Science 1988;241(4864):462-464.

28. Ogawa S, Tank DW, Menon R, Ellermann JM, Kim SG, Merkle H, Ugurbil K. Intrinsic signal changes accompanying sensory stimulation: functional brain mapping with magnetic resonance imaging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1992;89(13):5951-5955.

29. Kwong KK, Belliveau JW, Chesler DA, Goldberg IE, Weisskoff RM, Poncelet BP, Kennedy DN, Hoppel BE, Cohen MS, Turner R, et al. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1992;89(12):5675-5679.

30. Bandettini PA, Wong EC, Hinks RS, Tikofsky RS, Hyde JS. Time course EPI of human brain function during task activation. Magn Reson Med 1992;25(2):390-397.

31. Chen BR, Bouchard MB, McCaslin AF, Burgess SA, Hillman EM. High-speed vascular dynamics of the hemodynamic response. Neuroimage 2011;54(2):1021-1030.

32. Lindvere L, Janik R, Dorr A, Chartash D, Sahota B, Sled JG, Stefanovic B. Cerebral microvascular network geometry changes in response to functional stimulation. Neuroimage 2013;71C:248-259.

33. Lewis LD, Setsompop K, Rosen BR, Polimeni JR. Fast fMRI can detect oscillatory neural activity in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2016;113(43):E6679-E6685.

34. Turner R. How much cortex can a vein drain? Downstream dilution of activation-related cerebral blood oxygenation changes. Neuroimage 2002;16(4):1062-1067.

35. Donahue MJ, Hoogduin H, van Zijl PC, Jezzard P, Luijten PR, Hendrikse J. Blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) total and extravascular signal changes and DeltaR2* in human visual cortex at 1.5, 3.0 and 7.0 T. NMR Biomed 2011;24(1):25-34.

Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 27 (2019)