Synopsis
This presentation will be
focused on methods for the design and implementation of a pTx controller to be
connected to an available MR console.
Target Audience
Those interested in the design of in-house systems
for pTx applications Objective
This presentation will cover
- RF
pTx pulse specifications
- RF vector modulation principle
-
Selection of available integrated circuits (ICs)
Introduction
In a multi-channel or parallel transmission (pTx)
setup the transmit (B1) field
spatiotemporal profile can be fully controlled by independent control of the
waveform, amplitude and phase of the transmit pulses in the individual channels.
This makes pTx a very promising approach: i-at
high and ultra-high field, for shimming the B1
field to compensate dielectric artifacts due to the short excitation wavelength,
and ii-at lower fields, for
minimization of the RF electrical field (E1)
in metallic implants to improve safety. Thus, multi-channel transmit arrays are
becoming more common in body and brain imaging applications. A true pTx
operation requires independent control of the current/voltage per channel. In
the past, most commercial systems lacked such pTx control and in-house
controllers based on vector modulation were built in research sites [1-3]. Today
many research sites have commercial MRI systems with up to eight independent TX
channels. However, expansion to a higher density transmitter still requires the
design and implementation of additional TX control hardware. In addition, a
version of such hardware might be necessary for controlling non-conventional
amplifiers [4,5]. In this presentation I will demonstrate how to build a pTx
controller from low-cost commercial off-the-shelf ICs that meet
the specifications for most
MRI transmit applications. Following is a brief review of the vector modulation
operation principle and control.
RF Vector Modulation
In
most MRI applications, we work with narrowband modulated signals.
In a multi-channel transmitter, the RF voltage
(or current) pulse in channel i is
given by:
$$p_i (t)=A_i s_i (t)cos[ω_c t-ϕ_i(t)]$$ Eq. (1)
Where Ai
is the amplitude, si(t)
is a normalized modulating envelope or “shape” function and φi(t) is the phase for channel i.
By using the cosine trigonometric identity and rearranging terms, the following
equation is derived:
$$ p_i (t)=\color{blue} {A_i s_i (t)cos[ϕ_i(t)]}cos(ω_c t)+\color{blue} {A_i s_i (t)sin[ϕ_i(t)]}sin(ω_c t)$$Eq. (2)
This
equation is formed by the sum of two products, the right side is the product between
an in-phase baseband (spectrum centered
around zero frequency) signal and an
in-phase carrier signal while the second term is the product between the quadrature
components of same signals. This modulation can be implemented with a
quadrature (or I/Q) modulator (or upconverter) [6,7]. A simplified diagram is
shown in Figure 1a. The voltage at the
output of the modulator, now a bandpass signal (in a higher frequency band),
is given by:
$$V_{OUT,i} (t)=\color{blue}{V_{IBB,i}(t)}V_{IRF,i} (t)+\color{blue}{V_{QBB,i} (t)}V_{QRF,i} (t)=p_i (t)$$ Eq. (3)
Where
VIBB,i and VQBB,i
are the in-phase and quadrature baseband control voltages that correspond to the
terms highlighted in blue in Eq. (2); VIRF,i
and VQRF,i are the
in-phase and quadrature components of the carrier signal for channel i. By controlling the VIBB,i and VQBB,i voltages we control
the magnitude and rotation of a vector in the I-Q plane as shown in Figure 1b. For a given vector amplitude ρi and phase Φi at a given time t, the baseband control voltages are given by:
$$V_{IBB,i}=ρ_i cos(φ_i)$$Eq. (4)
$$V_{QBB,i}=ρ_i sin(φ_i)$$Eq. (5)
A pTx controller built with
vector modulators will have as many vectors as transmit channels, which can be
independently rotated with different amplitudes as set by the independently
controlled pair of baseband voltages. Note that the RF input of the modulator
could also be a modulated carrier (carrier multiplied by si(t) ). In this case the modulation of I/Q inputs will change only the
amplitude and phase of the signal. The type of control implemented for these
voltages will depend on the desired pTx application, as detailed below.
Modulation Control
Figure 2 shows a simplified diagram of an
implementation of an N-channel pTx interface built with vector modulators to
connect to an available console. In this implementation, the baseband voltages are
generated by a PC with a peripheral component interconnect (PCI) card that has
a sufficient number of analog outputs (2xN DACs) to control the modulators. The
RF inputs to the multiple modulators can be the small RF signal (before
amplification), available in most MR consoles, through an N-way, 0° phase power splitter. The I/Q outputs of the pTx
control can be triggered by the RF unblank available in the MR console.
We can perform a “static” control of the modulator
baseband I/Q signals, where ρi and φi are constant values across
the duration of the RF pulse (e.g. for B1
shimming applications). For the generation of more complex, tailored pTx pulses
(e.g. RF spokes), we perform a “dynamic” control of the I/Q signals per channel
(with sub-microsecond time resolution) across each RF excitation. Discussion
Today we can find high performance and low-cost I/Q
modulator ICs. However, we still need to consider small deviations from the
ideal modulator, most of which can be compensated through calibration [6,8]. A
mismatch between the in-phase (I) and quadrature (Q) control signals can result
in amplitude and phase errors of the transmit signal per channel, while a DC
offset in these inputs will generate an unmodulated component of the carrier at
the modulator output (RF leakage). In addition, RF feedthrough and feedback interference
across the electronics can also generate spurious components at the modulator
output.
We will review these imperfections, together with RF
pulse specifications for MRI, to select the right components to build a
low-cost, broadband and modular pTx controller. This controller will be
considered as an additional hardware to be connected to any available console. Alternatively, a standalone pTx controller requires
the design of the RF synthesizer, for example, using a direct digital
synthesizer (DDS) [9,10]. Besides vector modulation, I will present other
signal manipulation methods adopted for the design of a pTx interface that can control
switch-mode, instead of linear, RF power amplifiers. Acknowledgements
References
-
Stang PP, Kerr A, Pauly JM, and Scott GC, “An
extensible transmit array system using vector modulation and measurement,” In
Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting of ISMRM. Toronto, Canada, 2008,
Abstract 145.
-
Feng K, Hollingsworth N, McDougall M, Wright S.
A 64-channel transmitter for investigating parallel transmit MRI. IEEE Trans
Biomed Eng 2012;59:2152–2160.
-
Hollingsworth N, Moody K, Nielsen J, Noll DC,
Grissom WA, Wright S. An Easily Integrated Multichannel Modulator for All Field
Strengths. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Salt Lake City,
Utah, USA, 2013. Abstract 2744.
-
Gudino N, de Zwart JA, Duan Q, Dodd S, van
Gelderen P, Duyn J. Broadband Multi-Channel Optical Interface for On-Coil
Switch-Mode RF Amplification. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Meeting of
ISMRM, Milan, Italy, 2014. Abstract 320.
-
Gudino N, Duan Q, de Zwart JA, Murphy-Boesch J,
Dodd SJ, Merkle H, van Gelderen P, Duyn JH. Optically controlled switch-mode
current-source amplifiers for on-coil implementation in high-field parallel
transmission. Magn Reson Med 2016;76:340–349.
-
Razavi B. RF Microelectronics, 2nd ed.
Prentice Hall, 2011. p. 226-249.
-
Ruth Umstattd. AN-899 Operating and Evaluating
Quadrature Modulators for Personal Communication Systems. Texas Instruments,
1993
-
Eamon Nash. AN-1039. Correcting Imperfections in
IQ Modulators to Improve RF Signal Fidelity. Analog Devices, 2009
-
Jie S, Qin X, Ying L, Gengying L. Home-built
magnetic resonance imaging system (0.3 T) with a complete digital spectrometer.
Rev Sci Instrum. 2005; 76:105101
-
Stang PP, Conolly SM, Santos JM, Pauly JM, Scott
GC. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2012 Feb;31(2):370-9