Fast Imaging Techniques for Brain Imaging
Stefan Skare1

1Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden

Synopsis

"Fast Imaging Techniques for Brain Imaging" is a wide topic. This presentation will focus on the most recent advances in fast brain imaging towards comprehensive clinical brain exams by acquiring multiple MR contrasts simultaneously in minimal scan time.

Introduction

For many clinical brain protocols, five MR contrasts are often of particular importance (1):

  • T1-weighting or T1-FLAIR (pre+post Gd), with signal-enhancing tumors detected via contrast leakage through the blood-brain-barrier (BBB)
  • T2-weighting, which has high SNR and with high signal from free water (CSF, edema)
  • T2-FLAIR (FLuid Attenuated Inversion Recovery), which is good to detect e.g. MS lesions and inflammation in the brain while at the same time suppressing the free water signal (CSF)
  • T2*-weighting, acquired with a Gradient Echo type of sequence (unlike T2-w and T2-FLAIR), being sensitive to blood products in the brain (cavernoma, microbleeds, venous blood etc.)
  • Diffusion-weighting ("DWI") and its quantitative accompanying ADC map. This contrast is good for detection of acute stroke, but also e.g. for distinguishing a tumor from an abscess.

To shorten a brain MRI exam, parametric and non-parametric multi-contrast pulse sequences have emerged and gained popularity, where the idea is to in a single scan (preferably under about ~5 min) generate many of these MR contrasts at once.

Fast brain imaging via Parametric MRI

Recent popular parametric approaches are MR Fingerprinting (MRF) (2) and Synthetic MRI (3) (cf. ISMRM18: "Go Faster in Clinical Imaging: Fingerprinting"). In MRF, the flip angle (FA), echo time (TE) and repetition time (TR) are varied for each excitation to produce a unique signal-evolution fingerprint depending on the proton density (PD), T1, and T2 values in each tissue. In the reconstruction, the parametric PD-T1-T2 triplet is determined for each voxel by comparing the signal time course with Bloch simulated time courses in a large dictionary (like a criminal's fingerprint). For clinical use, weighted images (T1-w, T2-w, T1-FLAIR, T2-FLAIR) could be generated via these parametric maps via the signal equations involving FA, TE and TR for each sequence type.

In Synthetic MRI (cf. ISMRM18: "Go Faster in Clinical Imaging: Synthetic MR"), data is acquired to first produce parametric PD, T1 and T2 maps (similar to MRF), from which weighted images can be synthetically generated in the reconstruction.

Important to note is that using a model with simply PD, T1 and T2 values, on cannot produce T2*-w or DW images. Moreover, the T2-FLAIR contrast is difficult to synthesize well in practice due to partial volume effects, which can mimic pathology (4).

Fast brain imaging via multi-contrast MRI

Instead of modeling and fit parametric MR values, one can acquire multiple weighted MR-contrasts in a single fast scan. Breutigam et al. recently acquired T2* and DWI in parallel using an RS-EPI sequence (5). Moreover, a multi-contrast EPI sequence was recently developed (6), able to produce T1-FLAIR, T2-w, DWI (and the parametric ADC), T2*, and T2-FLAIR images with full brain coverage within 1:10 min. This sequence meets the bulk need for MR contrasts in brain MRI without using parametric maps, at the expense of lower matrix size and some degree of geometric distortions. A similar EPI-based multi-contrast technique has independently been developed (7) by another group, able to produce weighted contrasts such as T2*-w, T2-FLAIR, PD, but have also experimented to synthesize T1-w out of ratios of the other contrasts.

Finally, the great new interest in deep learning will likely help teasing out yet more information from both parametric MRI data as well as current and future multi-contrast acquisitions. Another positive effect of these acquisition schemes is that it simplifies the clinical workflow, which may improve data consistency. They also result in less time between each MR contrast due to reduced buttonology and prescans/tuning.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

  1. Di Muzio B. Brain trauma protocol (MRI). Radiopaedia [Internet].
  2. Ma D, Gulani V, Seiberlich N, Liu K, Sunshine JL, Duerk JL, Griswold MA. Magnetic resonance fingerprinting. Nature [Internet] 2013;495:187–192. doi: 10.1038/nature11971.
  3. Blystad I, Warntjes JBM, Smedby O, Landtblom A-M, Lundberg P, Larsson E-M. Synthetic MRI of the brain in a clinical setting. Acta radiol. [Internet] 2012;53:1158–1163. doi: 10.1258/ar.2012.120195.
  4. Vargas MI, Boto J, Delatre BM. Synthetic MR Imaging Sequence in Daily Clinical Practice. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. [Internet] 2016;37:68–69. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4895.
  5. Breutigam N-J, Frost R, Eickel K, Porter D. Simultaneous Multi-Contrast Imaging with Readout-Segmented EPI. In: Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the ISMRM, Honolulu, Hawaii. ; p. 520.
  6. Skare S, Sprenger T, Norbeck O, Rydén H, Blomberg L, Avventi E, Engström M. A 1-minute full brain MR exam using a multicontrast EPI sequence. Magn. Reson. Med. [Internet] 2017. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26974.
  7. Jeong J, Nam Y, Lee J. Penta-contrast imaging: a Novel Pulse Sequence for Simultaneous Acquisition of Proton Density, T1, T2, T2* and FLAIR images. In: Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the ISMRM, Honolulu, Hawaii. ; p. 3881.
Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 26 (2018)