Ken-Pin Hwang1, Jong Bum Son1, Suchandrima Banerjee2, Tao Zhang3, Jingfei Ma1, Gaiane Margishvili Rauch4, and Marcel Warntjes5
1Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States, 2MR Applications and Workflow, GE Healthcare, Menlo Park, CA, United States, 3MR Applications and Workflow, GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, United States, 4Department of Radiology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States, 5SyntheticMR, Linkoping, Sweden
Synopsis
3D QALAS is a promising new technique that simultaneously
maps T1, T2, and PD in a single 3D acquisition. However, the presence of fat
can confound multi-parameter mapping of voxels with mixed species. We modified
the sequence to acquire dualecho readouts and apply a joint field map
estimation across all echoes to produce water-only images for multi-parameter
fitting. The technique was applied in the breast and parameter maps were
compared with those generated from a 2D unsuppressed acquisition. By
eliminating partial volume effects of fat, the technique potentially extends
the use of 3D multi-parameter mapping into body, breast, and spine.
Introduction
3D QALAS [1] (3D-quantification using an interleaved
Look-Locker acquisition sequence with T2 preparation pulse) performs T1, T2 and
PD mapping in a single 3D acquisition, and can generate synthetic images with
tunable contrast. It was initially developed for cardiac imaging and more
recently for brain. However, extending multi-parameter mapping to general body
applications has been challenging due to partial volume effects of fat. When
two tissue types are present in the same voxel, their independent T1 and T2
values are difficult to distinguish. In this work, we combined a Dixon
fat-water method with 3D QALAS to enable 3D, water-only multi-parameter mapping
of human breast.Methods
The 3D QALAS sequence was implemented for untriggered acquisitions
in the head and body. This sequence consists of a 5 phases of varying contrasts
acquired with 3D gradient echo readouts in a single cycled acquisition. A T2
prep sequence precedes the first phase, followed by an inversion prep pulse and
4 delayed phases (figure 1). One cycle would acquire one segment of Cartesian k-space
for each of the 5 phases with spoiled gradient echo readouts, such that
repeating the cycle would fill all segments of k-space for 5 image sets. The T2
prep time and the initial delay after the inversion prep pulse were both set at
90 msec. The sequence timing was arranged such that the 5 phases of the
acquisition were equally spaced in time at 0.91 sec, mimicking a triggered
cardiac acquisition of approximately 66 beats/min.
The sequence was then further modified to enable a bipolar
dualecho readout to acquire data at approximately the in-phase and out-of-phase
echo times of water and fat, producing 10 raw image sets in all. All 5 pairs of
complex in- and out-of-phase data were processed with a flexible TE fat-water
separation technique with joint estimation [2,3] to produce 5 water-only and 5
fat-only image sets.
A female subject with breast cancer was imaged with the 3D
QALAS Dixon sequence on a 3T wide bore scanner (MR750W, GE Healthcare,
Waukesha, WI) using and 8-channel breast coil. Sequence parameters for breast
imaging were: FOV = 34.0 cm, matrix = 256x192, slice locations = 88, thickness
= 3.0 mm, flip = 4°, TR
= 4.2, TE = 1.3 and 2.5 msec, views per segment=100, ARC acceleration factor =
2, total scan time = 3:56. Subject was also scanned with a 2D multiecho
multidelay (MDME) technique [4] without fat suppression or fat-water separation.
Quantitative T1, T2, and PD maps were reconstructed from the water-only 3D
QALAS and unsuppressed 2D MDME images sets using a research version of SyMRI (SyntheticMR,
Linkoping, Sweden).Results
Fat-water separation was successfully performed on all 5 raw
image pairs, with no swaps or misclassification observed in the water- or
fat-only images. No shading of the T1 and T2 maps was observed over the entire
volume. One lesion surrounded by fat was markedly less visible in the maps generated
from the 2D non-suppressed acquisition when compared to those generated by 3D
QALAS with Dixon (Fig. 3).Discussion and Conclusion
We demonstrated the feasibility of 3D multi-parameter
mapping with Dixon fat-water separation for breast imaging. Although the
smaller voxel size of the 3D acquisition could reduce some of the partial
volume effects of fat, separation of the two species is critical for accurate
quantitation of water tissue. The phase evolution of fat relative to water over
multiple echo times remains the most reliable basis for fat-water separation,
as T1 and T2 values alone are typically not sufficient to distinguish the two
species in the same voxel without some tenuous assumptions. The adapted
flexible TE algorithm improves robustness further by incorporating information
from all 5 pairs of in- and out-of-phase echoes for field estimation. Though
the inversion pulse potentially changes the polarity of the spins at subsequent
phases, it did not affect the result of the fat-water separation algorithm.
While the dualecho acquisition is very efficient, a slight chemical shift
induced edge artifact was observed in the parameter maps.
While a B1 measurement was not built into the 3D technique,
the effects of B1 inhomogeneity were relatively small, partially due to the low
flip angle (4 degrees) required for the gradient echo acquisition. The
technique also does not require modeling of the slice profile for much of the
center portion of the slab. Thus 3D QALAS with Dixon fat-water separation is an
excellent method for rapid multi-parameter quantification and synthetic fat-suppressed
imaging in the breast, and potentially could be extended to other applications
such as body or spine imaging.Acknowledgements
Research support was provided in part by GE Healthcare.
References
1. Kvernby S, Warntjes MJ, Haraldsson H, Carlhäll
CJ, Engvall J, Ebbers T. Simultaneous three-dimensional myocardial T1 and T2 mapping
in one breath hold with 3D-QALAS. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2014; 16:102.
2. Ma J, Son JB, and Hazle JD. An improved region
growing algorithm for phase correction in MRI. Magn Reson in Med.
2015;76:519-529.
3. Son JB, Hwang KP, Madewell JE, Bayram E, Hazle
JD, Low RN, and Ma J. A Flexible Fast Spin Echo Triple-Echo Dixon Technique.
Magn Reson in Med. 2017;77:1049-1057.
4. Warntjes JB, Leinhard OD, West J, Lundberg P. Rapid
magnetic resonance quantification on the brain: Optimization for clinical
usage. Magn Reson Med. 2008 ; 60:320-9.