Elijah E.W. Van Houten1, Julien Testu2, Florian Dittmann3, Matthew D.J. McGarry4, John B. Weaver4,5, Keith D. Paulsen4,5, and Ingolf Sack3
1Département de génie mécanique, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada, 2SoundBite Medical Solutions Inc., Sherbrooke, QC, Canada, 3Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany, 4Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, United States, 5Department of Radiology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, United States
Synopsis
This abstract presents a non-linear inversion based power-law multi-frequency MR Elastography reconstruction, capable of reconstructing images at resolutions finer than the acquired displacement data. Reconstructed power-law parameters are compared with those obtained by logarithmic regression based on mono-frequency reconstructions of the same data.
INTRODUCTION
The
interest in viscoelastic parameters obtained from MR Elastography has grown
continuously since the development of the method, and preliminary results have
indicated the potential of these damping properties as biomarkers for a number
of targets, including the liver and the brain1. Viscous property
characterization has now begun to seek to identify the parameters describing
the spectral tissue response across a range of frequencies through power-law
(PL) models that can be related to multi-scale effects in both scattering2
and fluid-solid interactions3. This work presents the development of
a multi-frequency reconstruction method based on a power-law model (PL-MF MRE)
for the storage and loss modulus. The PL-MF MRE reconstruction method is
presented via in-vivo data in the human brain and the resulting PL parameters are
compared to values obtained from regression of mon-frequency reconstructions.METHODS
Experiments
were conducted on a 1.5-T Siemens MAGNETOM Sonata using single-shot spin-echo
EPI with trapezoidal flow-compensated MEGs in all three directions4.
The actuator employed was similar to the head rocker system described by Sack
et al5., with the setup detailed by Guo et al6. Full 3D
displacement fields at 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40 and 50 Hz were obtained in
healthy volunteers. Guideline Values:
Guidelines for the PL parameters for the viscoelastic material properties were
established via mono-frequency reconstructions using non-linear inversion (NLI)7.
The resulting distributions for μR and μI were fit to independent PL models, μR = θR·ωαR
and μI = θI·ωαI,
through a logarithmic regression at each voxel8, providing distributions
and volumetric means of θR, αR, θI
and αI, as
well as the RMS error for the regression fit. PL-MF MRE: The same displacement fields
were then provided to a NLI based PL-MF MRE reconstruction algorithm, based on
finite element methods and adjoint-gradient based optimization9 of
the objective function, $$\Phi=\frac{1}{2}\sum_{i=1}^{N_{freq}}\|u_c(\omega_i)-u_m^i\|.^2$$
Total Variation (TV) regularization was applied to counteract decreased
stability of the inversion given the strict application of the PL model. The
results from the PL-MF MRE reconstruction are the real and imaginary shear
modulus PL parameters, θR, αR, θI
and αI,
for the frequency range provided. The distributions and volumetric averages of
these parameters were compared with the guideline values obtained by
logarithmic regression. Super-resolution
MRE: While MRE is technically ‘super-resolution’ by default, due to the
shear wavelength being longer than typical imaging voxel resolutions, it is
possible to reconstruct material properties at resolutions finer than the
imaging resolution, provided sufficient data10. Here, the presence
of 6 measurements (real and imaginary displacements in 3 directions) at each
frequency, versus the 4 parameters to be reconstructed, (θR, αR, θI, αI),
permitted reconstruction at finer resolution than the measured displacement
data. For the finite element implementation used for the PL-MF MRE
reconstruction, the limiting factor for the reconstruction resolution was the
resolution of the Gauss points used to integrate the state equations for the
calculated displacements. For the 2 mm isotropic voxels used here, material
parameter resolutions smaller than 1.2 mm would generate cases where the
resulting material property had no influence on the displacement values, thus
limiting reconstruction resolution unless the measured displacements were
interpolated onto a finer resolution mesh, which was not done in this case. Super-resolution
distributions of θR, αR, θI
and αI
were calculated on 1.2 mm voxels using the same PL-MF MRE method used for 2 mm
voxels.
RESULTS
As
reported in Testu et al8., mono-frequency reconstructed properties were
generally well described by a power-law model, except in the region of the falx
cerebri. The TV stabilized PL-MF MRE reconstruction provided similar PL
parameters to the regression results, with image definition
clearly improved through the incorporation of multiple displacement fields into
the NLI algorithm. Figures 1 and 2 compare the guideline values for the PL parameters and those from the PL-MF MRE reconstruction for the real and imaginary shear modulus, respectively. Figures 3 and 4 show the resulting fit to the mono-frequency real and imaginary shear modulus values, respectively. Finally, Figure 5 shows the super-resolution PL parameters at 1.2 mm, reconstructed via PL-MF MRE. In general, guideline PL parameter values are in good agreement with those obtained by PL-MF MRE, with the largest disagreements coming in regions of high RMS error for the logarithmic regression.
CONCLUSIONS
This preliminary demonstration of a PL-MF MRE method able to
match the PL parameters obtained from regression analysis of mono-frequency
reconstruction results provides an important step toward accurate and
verifiable quantification of the dispersive, multi-scale nature of soft-tissue.Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by NIH Grants R01-EB018230 awarded
by the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging Bioengineering and R01-AA023684
awarded by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. Financial
support of the Bundesministerium fr Bildung und Forschung (BMBF 01GQ1408) is gratefully
acknowledged. EEWVH acknowledges financial support from NSERC (Discovery Grant
#435399-2013) for this work and is a member of the FRQ-S-funded Centre de
recherche du Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke (CR-CHUS).References
1. Klatt D, Hamhaber U, Asbach P, Braun J, Sack I.
Noninvasive assessment of the rheological behavior of human organs using
multifrequency MR elastography: a study of brain and liver viscoelasticity.
Physics in Medicine and Biology. 2007; 52(24): 7281–7294.
2. Sinkus R,
Siegmann K, Xydeas T, et al. MR elastography of breast lesions:
Understanding the solid/liquid duality can improve the specificity of
contrast-enhanced MR mammography. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2007; 58(6):
1135-1144.
3. Parker K. A microchannel flow model for soft
tissue elasticity. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 2014; 59(15): 4443.
4. Dittmann F, Tzschätzsch H, Hirsch S, et al. Tomoelastography
of the abdomen: Tissue mechanical properties of the liver, spleen, kidney, and
pancreas from single MR elastography scans at different hydration states. Magnetic
Resonance in Medicine. 2016; 76(4): 1116-1126.
5. Sack I, Beierbach B, Hamhaber U, et al. Non-invasive
measurement of brain viscoelasticity using magnetic resonance Elastography. NMR
in BioMedicine. 2008; 21(3): 265-271.
6. Guo J, Hirsch S, Fehlner A, et al. Towards an
Elastographic Atlas of Brain Anatomy. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8(8): e71807.
7. McGarry M, Johnson C, Sutton B, et al. Including spatial
information in nonlinear inversion MR elastography using soft prior
regularization. IEEE transactions on medical imaging. 2013; 32(10): 1901-1909.
8. Testu J, McGarry M, Dittmann F, et al. Viscoelastic power
law parameters of in vivo human brain estimated by MR Elastography. Journal of
the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials. 2017; 74: 333-341.
9. Tan L, McGarry M, Van Houten E, et al. Gradient-Based
Optimization for Poroelastic and Viscoelastic MR Elastography. IEEE transactions
on medical imaging. 2017; 36(1): 236-250.
10. Perrins M, Barnhill E, Kennedy P, et al. Super-Resolution
Magnetic Resonance Elastography (SR-MRE) of Exercise Induced Muscle Damage
(EIMD). Proceedings of the 24th Annual Meeting of the ISMRM. 2016; 0752.