Kisoo Kim1, Elodie Breton1, Afshin Gangi1,2, and Jonathan Vappou1
1ICube CNRS / University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France, 2Department of Interventional Imaging, Strasbourg university hospital, Strasbourg, France
Synopsis
Interventional MR Elastography (MRE) and
thermometry (PRF) using the Simultaneous Image Refocusing (SIR) technique is
proposed in order to monitor changes in temperature and biomechanical
properties during thermal ablations, in multiple contiguous slices. Compared to
the conventional GRE-MRE sequence, two slices are acquired in each TR, with a
single motion sensitizing gradient and similar fractional motion encoding. Elasticity
maps obtained with SIR-GRE MRE are validated against reference single slice GRE-MRE.
Preliminary experiments show the potential of contiguous multislice acquisition
to monitor the volumetric extent of the heated area obtained with High
Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) in a phantom.
Introduction
Interventional
MR Elastography (MRE) has been developed to monitor changes in biomechanical
properties induced by thermal ablations1. Based on a GRE sequence,
it allows deriving both elasticity and thermometry maps simultaneously in a
single slice1-2 at a typical update rate of 2s. However, real-time
monitoring of thermal ablations requires the acquisition of multiple contiguous
slices in order to spatially cover
the ablation area, while preserving sufficient temporal resolution. This paper
proposes the use of the Simultaneous Image Refocusing (SIR) technique3
for the simultaneous MRE encoding and acquisition of 2 slices in each single
acquisition.Methods
As shown in Fig.
1, the SIR-GRE MRE sequence acquires two sequential echoes in a single TR,
created with two RF pulses in combination with two pre-dephasing readout
gradients. Hence two non-contiguous slices are acquired per TR with a single
motion sensitizing gradient (MSG), each slice having its specific TE3.
It is possible to acquire the echoes for 2 slices with TR = 2 mechanical
periods (Texc), similar to the typical GRE MRE protocol. All experiments
are conducted in a 1.5 T MRI scanner (MAGNETOM Aera, Siemens, Germany). Pneumatic
excitation is used for wave generation within the phantoms. Elastograms are
reconstructed by using a local frequency estimation (LFE)-based algorithm.
Motion is encoded through slice. Proton Resonance Frequency (PRF) shift thermometry is used to
evaluate temperature variations from the MRE dataset1-2.
The first
experiment aims at comparing the proposed SIR-GRE MRE sequence to a regular single
slice GRE MRE sequence. It is performed on a 7% gelatin phantom with a 9% gelatin
cylindrical inclusion. Slices 1 and 2 are axial to the inclusion main axis,
with a slice gap of 7 mm. Relevant imaging parameters common to both sequences
are: mechanical excitation frequency 100 Hz, MSG frequency 122 Hz, 4 phase
offsets for temporal Fourier transform, TR 20 ms, FOV 250 mm x 250 mm, thickness
7 mm, matrix 128 x 128, flip angle
10° and bandwidth 1000 Hz/pixel. For the proposed
SIR-GRE MRE sequence, TE1/TE2 = 10.2/12.6 ms, and the acquisition time for 2
slices is 2560 ms. For the reference GRE-MRE sequence, TE = 10.2ms, and the
acquisition time per slice is 2560 ms, i.e. the acquisition time for 2 slices
is 5120 ms.
The second
experiment is performed in a 7% gelatin phantom containing bovine muscle. HIFU ablation
starts 30s after the SIR-GRE MRE acquisition begins. It lasts 60s at an
acoustic power of 30 W, with the focal spot being positioned at the interface between
tissue and gelatin. Two acquisitions of two slices (slice gap 100% between 2 simultaneously
acquired slices) are interleaved with no space between slices. Slices 1 to 4
cover a volume going from pure gelatin to pure tissue, centered on the
interface between gelatin and tissue. Other imaging parameters are
equal to those used in experiment 1 with the SIR-GRE MRE sequence, except that 3
phase offsets are used for higher update rate.Results
Means and
standard deviations calculated respectively in the inclusion and the background
for both slices in experiment 1 are shown Table 1. Values of shear moduli found
with the SIR-GRE MRE sequence were found to be highly similar to those obtained
with the reference GRE-MRE. Figure 3 illustrates temperature and elasticity
maps on the 4 contiguous slices 100 seconds after the end of heating. Differences
in temperature elevation across the 4 slices are clearly visible, as well as
differences in elasticity due to the fact that these 4 slices are located
around the tissue/gelatin interface. Discussion
Simultaneous MRE/MR thermometry aims at improving the monitoring of thermal therapies by
providing two complementary biomarkers, namely the changes in elasticity and
temperature.
Thermal
ablations are volumetric, hence their monitoring by MRI should be done with
multislice acquisitions. As shown in Fig. 3, temperature estimates, and
therefore thermal dose to a greater extent, differ significantly from one slice
to another. However, acquiring multiple slices means diminishing the temporal
resolution.
In GRE MRE, the
MSG duration limits the minimum TR that can be used. The straightforward
acceleration method is to use strong fractional encoding so that the TR can be
equal to a single mechanical period, instead of two. However, this also implies
lower wave encoding. The SIR-GRE MRE sequence offers an equivalent acceleration
factor for two slices, with similar elasticity values as the reference single
slice GRE sequence. Conclusion
The SIR-GRE MRE
sequence provides stiffness values and temperature shifts simultaneously in
multiple slices, while minimizing the loss in terms of temporal resolution.Acknowledgements
This study was partly funded by French excellence program Labex CAMI
(ANR-11-LABX-0004).References
1. Corbin N, Vappou J, Breton E, et al. Interventional
MR elastography for MRI-guided percutaneous. Magn Reson Med. 2015;75(3):1110-1118.
2. Le Y, Glaser K, Rouviere O, et al. Feasibility of simultaneous temperature
and tissue stiffness detection by MRE. Magn Reson Med. 2006;55:700-705.
3. Feinberg
DA, Reese TG, Wedden VJ. Simultanous echo refocusing in EPI. Magn Reson Med. 2002;48(1):1-5.