The pig brain model is an important translational model due to its similarity to the human brain anatomy and physiology. However, a lack of a priori information required for common functional analysis techniques dictates that new techniques are required to explore the connectivity of the pig brain. Here we present two new, unsupervised forms of analysis to find functional connectivity in healthy and ischemic stroke pigs using sparse deep convolutional neural networks and dynamic time warping with spectral clustering that yield complementary results.
MRI data acquisition: Resting state BOLD fMRI data was collected from two adult male castrated Landrace pigs (1 pig 24 hours post-ischemic stroke induction and 1 healthy pig) using a 3T GE HDx Signa scanner. To minimize signal changes from motion, the pigs were anesthetized throughout the study. The scan consisted of a total of 300 time points with a TE of 3ms, TR of 2000ms, over 21 slices with a resolution of 1.56x1.56mm, and an acquisition matrix of 128x128 voxels. Anatomical scans were also performed. Figure 1 shows two representative slices and voxel time series from both pigs with a clearly observable stroke region.
Data analysis: To study functional connectivity, two methods for discovering functional connectivity were compared: CNN-SA and DTW+SC. The goal of CNN-SA was to train an unsupervised autoencoder to store temporal features related to hemodynamic responses in the weights of the trained model. Figure 2 shows the overall structure of the CNN-SA. The weights in each layer are convolved over the input time-series and outputted functional connectivity maps are a sequence of values that correspond to how strongly the weights correlate to a sliding window section of the time-series. Functional connectivity maps from the first layer for each voxel were mapped back to the anatomical locations to determine if locations in the brain have clusters of similarly high functional connectivity strength. Because CNN-SA is trained to extract common features present in the time-series, these functional connectivity strengths should show functional similarities between regions and potentially expose resting state network (RSN) locations.3 A complementary method involving the use of DTW+SC was also performed to provide another analysis for comparison. Both dynamic time warping and spectral clustering have been separately used as potential unsupervised methods for uncovering RSNs.4,5
1. Gutierrez K, Dicks N, Glanzner WG, Agellon LB, Bordignon V. Efficacy of the porcine species in biomedical research. Front Genet. 2015;6(SEP). doi:10.3389/fgene.2015.00293.
2. Douglas WR. OF PIGS AND MEN AND RESEARCH. Space Life Sci. 1972;3:226-234. doi:10.1007/BF00928167.
3. Goodfellow, Ian, Bengio, Yoshua, Courville A. Deep Learning. MIT Press. http://www.deeplearningbook.org/. Published 2016.
4. Venkataraman A, Van Dijk KRA, Buckner RL, Golland P. Exploring functional connectivity in fMRI via clustering. In: 2009 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing. Vol 33. ; 2009:441-444. doi:10.1038/nbt.3121.ChIP-nexus.
5. Meszlenyi RJ, Hermann P, Buza K, Gal V, Vidnyanszky Z. Resting State FMRI Functional Connectivity Analysis Using Dynamic Time Warping. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2017;11. doi:10.3389/fnins.2017.00075
6. Buckner RL, Andrews-Hanna JR, Schacter DL. The Brain’s Default Network. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1124(1):1-38. doi:10.1196/annals.1440.011.