Lena Vaclavu1, Magdalena Sokolska2, Aart J Nederveen1, and David L Thomas2
1Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2Institute of Neurology/Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College London, London, United Kingdom
Synopsis
Pseudo continuous arterial spin
labelling (pCASL) suffers from reduced labelling efficiency in extreme flow
conditions. In this work we investigated the sensitivity of labelling
efficiency to velocity values measured in vivo to ascertain its variability
over a clinically relevant range of velocities. We measured arterial blood velocity
in the neck at the level of the labelling plane, and obtained simulated
labelling efficiency values, which we found to differ significantly between
high and low velocity populations. Changes in labelling efficiency induced by acetazolamide administration may
have implications for future work using pCASL for cerebrovascular reserve
assessments.
Introduction
While pCASL is the most widely used arterial
spin labelling technique for non-invasive cerebral perfusion imaging, it
generally suffers from lower labelling efficiency than the pulsed variant. This
can be exacerbated by very low or very high velocity blood flow in the arteries
where labeling occurs. Since perfusion imaging is often applied to elderly
subjects with low arterial blood flow, or alternatively patient populations with
high flow (e.g. sickle cell disease), there is a gap in our understanding of
the extent to which the labelling efficiency varies in clinically relevant
situations. In this work, we performed simulations of labelling
efficiency of different pCASL implementations with respect to the velocity of
the intraluminal spins being inverted during a pCASL experiment. We compared the velocities measured in the labelling
plane using phase-contrast MRI (PC-MRI), and compared the corresponding
labelling efficiencies between groups with varying flow conditions: elderly
subjects, adults with sickle cell disease, and paediatric sickle cell disease
patients, who are expected to have the highest velocities. Methods
Imaging: Thirty-two
adults and thirty-five children with sickle cell disease (SCD), eleven healthy
controls, sixty-eight elderly subjects undergoing pCASL studies for research at
our lab were included. Studies were conducted under IRB-approval and images
were acquired on 3.0 Tesla clinical MR systems
(Intera/Ingenia, Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands) with a
15/32-channel head coil and body coil transmission. Phase contrast (PC-)MRI
images were acquired in a single slice positioned 90 mm below the centre of the
pCASL imaging volume, with the following parameters: TR/TE=15/5
ms, FOV 230 x 230 mm, voxel size 0.45
x 0.45 mm, slice thickness 4 mm, flip angle 15°, VENC 80/140 cm/s adjusted for
elderly subjects and SCD respectively, and a total scan duration of 60 seconds.
Simulations: Bloch
equations were solved to test the effect of pCASL labelling parameters used in
the various cohorts that were included, i.e Sequence 1 and 2, for a range of velocities
(curves are provided in Figure 1).
Post-processing: Phase offset correction and phase-unwrapping was performed in cases of velocity aliasing in the PC-MRI data. The internal carotid arteries (ICA) and vertebral arteries (VA) were
segmented on the magnitude images using commercial software Mimics (Materialise,
Leuven, Belgium). Data were masked in MATLAB (MathWorks, Natick, MA, US) using customised scripts. Mean and maximum velocity, flow, and lumen cross-sectional area were
calculated for each vessel indicated by arrows in Figure 2. Labelling
efficiency values for each vessel were chosen based on the maximum measured
velocity (Vmax), assuming laminar flow. A weighted labelling efficiency was
based on the percentage of volumetric flow contributed by each vessel.
Analyses: (Non)-parametric
and paired tests were performed to test group-, region-, and ACZ-induced differences.
P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Phase contrast MRI results are shown in Figure 3 which shows significant
differences in maximum velocity in the internal carotid and vertebral arteries between healthy adult controls, hypertensive elderly, and sickle cell disease groups.
Volumetric flow rate was ~70% of the total flow for the ICA vessels and ~30% of
the total flow in the VA vessels in all cohorts. Weighted labelling efficiency was
significantly higher in all cohorts compared to adult healthy controls, as
shown in 3c. Surprisingly, the
elderly hypertensive cohort with the lowest velocity had higher mean labelling efficiency
than the adult healthy controls, because they had been scanned with Sequence 1,
which had high efficiency at low velocities, compared to Sequence 2 which had low efficiency at low velocities. Labelling efficiency increased significantly after
acetazolamide administration due to increased velocity (Figure 4, p=0.002).Discussion
We found varying labelling efficiency sensitivity to
velocity in four groups, where sickle cell disease and elderly had higher
efficiency than the adult healthy controls. This was because the relationship
between labelling efficiency and velocity was also sequence dependent, meaning
labelling characteristics also played a role in determining if a certain velocity
would result in high or low efficiency. Therefore, estimating and correcting
for the efficiency may improve quantification of CBF from pCASL, because we
have shown that there can be considerable changes in efficiency due to velocity. These
findings have implications for cerebrovascular reserve experiments because velocity increases and, depending on the
sequence used, may either increase, or decrease labelling efficiency. Conclusion
In
conclusion, pCASL labelling efficiency can be estimated and accounted for in
cases where velocity in the labelling
region is expected to be much lower or higher than the optimal range.Future work is directed towards investigation of the effect of a correction for labelling efficiency in CBF quantification for cerebrovascular reserve studies.Acknowledgements
This work
was supported by Dutch foundation “Fonds Nuts Ohra” grant no. 1303-055.
Clinical trials.gov identifier: NCT02824406. DLT is supported by the UCL
Leonard Wolfson Experimental Neurology Centre (PR/ylr/18575).References
S Aslan, F Xu, PL Wang, J Uh, U
Yezhuvath, M van Osch, H Lu. ESTIMATION OF LABELING EFFICIENCY IN
PSEUDO-CONTINUOUS ARTERIAL SPIN LABELING. Magn Reson Med. 2010 Mar; 63(3):
765–771.